Wednesday, July 23, 2025

When Influence Becomes Control: The Soft Takeover That Hijacked a Boxing Game’s Vision

By [Poe]

Introduction: How Did We Get Here?

In the gaming industry, not all takeovers involve stock trades, boardroom battles, or press releases. Sometimes, the power shift is silent. Subtle. Strategic. And by the time the community realizes what’s happened, the game has transformed into something they never asked for.

That’s exactly what many long-time fans of realistic boxing games feel has happened. What was once pitched as a simulation-first revival of boxing—a love letter to the sweet science—has morphed into a confused identity of esports flash, TikTok-ready chaos, and developer–YouTuber alliances.

One of the key reasons? A soft power takeover—not from a traditional game designer or boxing veteran, but from someone with a background in community management.

What Is a Soft Power Takeover?

A soft power takeover isn’t about force or deception in the traditional sense. It’s when an individual gains control over creative direction, team dynamics, and public messaging without formally being in charge—all through trust, influence, and strategic positioning.

In this particular case, the owner of a promising boxing game startup had no real background in game development. Eager to break into the industry and fill a long-vacant niche, he leaned on someone with senior community experience—a Community Manager or Community Lead from another studio—who presented themselves as a guide.

That trust turned into a blank check.

This community veteran would go on to assume multiple titles:

Director of Global Communications
Gameplay Director
Director of Product
Director of Authenticity

None of which, upon public review, were supported by their historical work résumé.

What Do You Call That?

There are several names for someone who gains such expansive power without credentialed merit:

1. Influence Operator

Someone who thrives on positioning rather than production. They rarely ship features, but they shape the conversations around them.

2. Vision Hijacker

They subtly redirect the purpose of a game under buzzwords like "polish," "accessibility," or "engagement," diluting its soul in the process.

3. Power Proxy

They become the de facto decision-maker—not because they were appointed, but because the owner doesn’t know how to lead without them.

4. Narrative Gatekeeper

They control how the community sees the company, who gets to speak for the devs, and how dissent is treated. They manage fans like a brand, not a conversation.

Sports Gaming Analysis (Beas): A Jarring Delivery, But Possibly Right

Sports Gaming Analysis, also known as Beas, has commented on this dynamic. His delivery can be raw—sometimes sharp enough to offend casual listeners or those unfamiliar with the deeper story—but the core of his critique may not be far off.

Beas has pointed out inconsistencies in communication, marketing pivots, and the disconnect between what fans were promised and what’s being delivered. His tone can catch people off guard, but those who’ve followed the history closely know he’s pointing at something real—the shift in leadership ethos, authenticity, and purpose.

While others focus on surface-level gameplay or patch notes, Beas digs into the political undercurrents—something most fans aren’t trained to spot.

Why This Is So Damaging for Simulation Games

Boxing fans waited over a decade for another Fight Night. They didn’t ask for an arcade slugfest disguised as simulation. When someone with no experience in gameplay design begins controlling:

What realism means
Which animations are kept or removed
How stamina, footwork, and AI are tuned
And how the entire game is marketed and framed to the public...

…it’s not just frustrating. It’s disrespectful to the sport itself.

The boxing community—especially those who value simulation and realism—is not passive. They study tape, understand feints, angles, inside fighting, and rhythm. They want a game that respects boxing’s complexity, not reduces it for clips and casual viewers.

This shift feels like betrayal—not just of gameplay mechanics, but of identity.

When Titles Replace Talent

In corporate culture, we often hear about “title inflation”—people receiving grand titles without the experience or skillset to match.

In this case, the same thing happened. From community management to Gameplay Director? From messaging lead to Director of Product and Authenticity?

It’s not just about being underqualified. It’s about whether such a person should ever have been allowed to reshape the design philosophy of an entire game.

The outcome? A product that satisfies no one:

Simulation fans say it’s not deep enough.
Casuals don’t stick around.
Content creators are left in an awkward dance of half-truths and cheerleading.
Developers with more specialized skillsets are marginalized or overridden.

The Owner’s Role in the Takeover

Let’s not ignore the other half of this equation: the owner. When someone has a dream but no development experience, they’re vulnerable to those who “speak the language” of game dev.

That’s not inherently bad—but it becomes a problem when they entrust their entire vision to someone who wasn’t qualified to evolve it.

Instead of hiring experienced gameplay directors, AI engineers, and boxing historians, the owner allowed a community lead to stretch into every lane—design, marketing, authenticity, and gameplay.

The results speak for themselves.

Final Thoughts: The Warning for Future Sports Games

This is more than just a cautionary tale for one game. It’s a reflection of a growing problem in the indie–AA space: personality-driven influence outranking proven craft.

Community managers, social media strategists, and PR leads play crucial roles. But they should not be running gameplay systems or authenticity departments unless they’ve earned it.

And fans? They must stop mistaking familiarity or visibility for credibility.

To Boxing Fans and Real Sports Gamers:

Demand transparency about who’s in charge of your favorite games.
Question: When someone suddenly becomes the “face” or “voice” of authenticity.
Push back when a game’s vision is changed without your feedback.

Simulation is not boring. It’s beautiful. And it deserves to be led by people who respect the craft—not just the clout.

Let Boxing Fans Have Their Game: A War for the Soul of Undisputed

Let Boxing Fans Have Their Game:

A War for the Soul of Undisputed

When Undisputed was first revealed to the public, it wasn’t marketed as just another arcade fighting game. It was pitched as the definitive boxing simulation—a spiritual successor to Fight Night Champion, a project backed by real boxers and fueled by real fans. That promise hit home. It gave boxing purists hope.

But now? That vision is being chipped away by louder, less invested voices: YouTubers chasing clicks, MMA fans looking for a new toy, and super casual players who balk at anything that requires depth. These groups are not only distorting the expectations around Undisputed—they’re influencing its development path.

This isn’t about gatekeeping. This is about preservation. Boxing fans aren’t trying to hijack your games—we’re asking that you don’t hijack ours.

1. Let Boxing Fans Drive the Direction — Not the Tourists

Let’s be brutally honest: if you're not a fan of the sweet science, you shouldn't be directing its digital future.

Boxers and hardcore fans have never tried to infiltrate UFC, Street Fighter, or WWE communities demanding realism or fundamental changes. But when a boxing sim finally emerges from the shadows after over a decade of drought, suddenly everyone wants to reshape it into something more familiar to them.

Why?
Because they don't want to learn.
They want immediate gratification.

That’s not how boxing works. This is a sport built on discipline, timing, footwork, tactics, and mental warfare. If you want a taste of that world, join us—but don't try to rewrite it because it doesn’t fit your button-mashing comfort zone.

2. The YouTuber Effect: Sugarcoating the Decline

Let’s get specific. YouTubers are not just reacting to Undisputed—they're shaping its public perception. And many of them are doing more harm than good.

They claim to be “honest reviewers” but rarely push back against SCI’s failings.
They constantly hype “improvements” while ignoring the absence of foundational boxing features.
And worst of all, they’re helping market a product that’s drifting further from what was promised.

It wasn’t a YouTuber who created the Undisputed trailer that pulled in over a million views. That was SCI’s in-house vision—the very one that inspired so many boxing fans to invest emotionally (and financially) in the game.

Instead of holding the developers accountable to that standard, many creators now help lower it. They market what the hardcore fans never asked for, never needed, and never wanted.

3. Casual Fans: Loud, Entitled, and Misguided

The casual crowd has a louder voice than ever—and they’re drowning out the fans who actually care about the sport.

Let’s break it down:

They want to throw 150 punches per round with no stamina consequences.
They think parries should happen every other second.
They complain when footwork isn’t “instant,” not realizing real fighters use angles, not teleportation.
They whine when realistic mechanics slow the game down—even though that’s literally how boxing works.

And yet, developers are listening to them.

That’s the danger. When the volume of noise outweighs the quality of feedback, games start pivoting away from their core identity. And make no mistake—Undisputed is pivoting.

4. Boxing Is Not MMA — Stop Conflating the Two

We respect MMA fans. We love the athletes. But Undisputed is not a UFC game, and boxing is not just “striking without kicks.”

MMA titles like UFC 4 prioritize flashy moves and dynamic sequences because that’s how mixed martial arts is structured. Boxing, on the other hand, is about rhythm, ring generalship, setup punches, counters, feints, inside work, clinching, and scoring strategy.

What boxing fans want from Undisputed:

Boxer-specific traits and tendencies (Ali doesn’t fight like Marciano)
Referee logic with fouls, breaks, and warnings
Proper clinch mechanics
Damage zones and realistic KOs
Dynamic footwork and cut-off strategies
True stamina, fatigue, and recovery systems
An AI that adapts like a real cornered boxer would

These aren’t luxury features. They’re boxing essentials. But when outside audiences dismiss them as “too much” or “too niche,” the devs take shortcuts to appease those louder, less educated players.

5. Boxing Fans Must Get Louder—And More Organized

This isn’t just a vent session. It’s a rally cry.

If boxing fans want to reclaim Undisputed, we need to be smarter, louder, and more unified than ever. That means:

Commenting with purpose across every dev post and YouTube video
Documenting feature regressions and broken mechanics
Creating our own content that pushes realism and accountability
Amplifying legit voices in the community—those who understand boxing and care about its representation
Calling out sugarcoaters, not with hate, but with facts

And if the devs keep listening to the wrong voices, we amplify ours until they can't ignore us.

6. YouTubers: If You Love the Game, Stop Enabling Its Decline

Some of you built your entire following around Undisputed. That comes with responsibility.

You are not just content creators—you are curators of perception. You can’t keep pretending everything is fine while the core mechanics rot beneath shiny new coats of paint.

Stop calling arcade updates “game changers.”
Stop defending missing systems with “early access” excuses—it’s been years.
Stop marketing gameplay that doesn’t reflect what boxing is.
And stop gatekeeping criticism. Fans aren’t “haters” for demanding the actual sport be respected.

If you want to be part of the solution, use your platform to advocate for depth, not dopamine.

Final Round: Stop Glazing. Start Demanding.

What Undisputed is becoming is not what it was sold to be.

And boxing fans have every right to be angry. We have every right to push back. We have every right to take up space in this conversation—more space than the tourists, casuals, and content creators chasing affiliate links.

This game should have been the NBA 2K of boxing.
A living, breathing boxing ecosystem.
A tribute to the sport.
An educational experience for new fans.
A competitive playground for purists.

Instead, we’re watching it drift into the same forgettable territory as every other “almost” sports game. And we say: no more.

The Core Demands:

- Full sim control options and sliders
- Boxer-specific styles, traits, and behavior
- Functional referee and foul system
- Real stamina and fatigue mechanics
- Clinching and inside-fighting
- Proper scoring and AI corner tactics
- Career depth and presentation
- A community built around boxing—not engagement metrics

Closing Statement:

Let boxing fans have their game.
Let us build the foundation.
Let others learn what boxing is—not overwrite it with what they already know.

This isn’t a matter of “letting everyone have fun.” This is about letting the sport of boxing be respected—digitally, strategically, and culturally.

Why You’re Paying for DLC Boxers — And Why It’s Not a Scam

The Real Transparency is Letting Gamers Know That Their Money Helps Attract and Pay Boxers. It Also Helps SCI Stay in Business!

Why You’re Paying for DLC Boxers — And Why It’s Not a Scam

The Hidden Economy Behind Licensing, Development, and Keeping Boxing Games Alive

1. The Disconnect: What Fans Think vs. What Actually Happens

Many fans feel like they're being nickel-and-dimed when they see legendary boxers or prospects behind a paywall.
They ask:

“Didn’t they already sell over a million copies?”
“Why is my favorite boxer not just in the game?”
“Other sports games don’t make me pay for legends!”

This mindset comes from comparing SCI — an independent developer with limited resources — to multi-billion-dollar giants like EA or 2K. But the behind-the-scenes reality of building a licensed sports game—especially in a niche sport like boxing—is more complex and more financially demanding than most players realize.

2. The Truth About Boxer Licensing: It’s Expensive, It’s Complicated, and It’s Never Permanent

When you license a real-life boxer, you’re not just getting their name.

You’re paying for:

Likeness rights (face, body, style)
Voiceover rights
Motion capture likeness (animation fidelity)
Photo/video reference archives
Union fees and legal representation
Estate permissions for deceased boxers
Royalties, either upfront or ongoing

And here’s the kicker: each boxer is a separate legal deal. There is no central organization like FIFPro or NBPA managing licenses. There’s no global “boxers union” granting access to the whole sport. SCI (or any studio) has to individually negotiate with each boxer or their estate.

Many top boxers, legends, and even prospects will say no unless there’s:

A large upfront fee
Or a guaranteed share of DLC sales revenue

So when you see Mike Tyson, Roy Jones Jr., or Floyd Mayweather not in a game? It’s not always because the devs didn’t try. Sometimes the price tag was too high, or the boxer wanted royalties tied to sales.

That’s where DLC comes in.

3. Why DLC Exists: The Only Way to Add More Boxers After Launch

Let’s kill a myth: DLC isn’t just about greed — it’s about sustainability.

Without DLC, many of these boxers wouldn’t be in the game at all.

Here's how DLC helps:

Incentivizes boxers to sign late (they get their own content drop)
Generates revenue to pay new licensing fees
Keeps funding ongoing mocap, dev time, and QA
Allows small studios to scale gradually without collapsing under up-front licensing debt

SCI can go to a boxer and say:

“We can’t give you $250K upfront, but we’ll give you a cut of the DLC sales if fans are willing to buy.”

That deal doesn’t exist without DLC.

4. SCI’s Real Costs — And Why 1 Million Sales Doesn’t Mean “They’re Rich Now”

Let’s break down what happens after SCI sells 1 million copies of Undisputed at *$50-60 average.

Hypothetical Revenue:

$50-60 x 1,000,000 = $50-60 million gross revenue (The game is often on sale, with prices sometimes dropping to $35.99 or lower. )

But from that, subtract:

Steam/Epic/Sony/Microsoft fees (~30%) → $15M gone
Publisher cut (if involved) → up to $10M gone
Taxes, accounting, payment processors → another $2–5M
Team salaries (50–100+ staff over 5+ years) → $15–20M+
Motion capture, animation, QA, dev tools, build systems → Millions
Boxer licensing fees for 100+ boxers → easily $3–5M+
Rent, equipment, marketing, press tours, booth space → $1–3M

Actual clean profit? Maybe $1–3 million at best.

And that’s after 5–6 years of work. Now imagine trying to fund post-launch updates, pay new boxers, and start work on a sequel or major update.

The revenue from DLC keeps the studio afloat while also growing the game.

5. Why Comparing SCI to EA or 2K Is a False Equivalency

When fans say:

“Fight Night never made me pay for Tyson!”
“UFC gives me hundreds of fighters out the gate!”

They’re comparing a garage-built racecar to an F1 team.

EA Sports UFC 5 likely had a budget in the range of $70–120 million.
SCI might have spent $8–15 million total on Undisputed. Yet it offers:

Far better boxer animations
A growing roster of over 100 boxers
Realistic, sim-style gameplay not found in arcade titles
Constant updates, AI adjustments, and planned new modes

The playing field isn’t level. EA can afford to bundle everything. SCI can’t.

6. Without DLC, Realistic Boxing Games Die Again

Fight Night is gone because EA decided the ROI wasn’t high enough for a niche sport like boxing.
Don King Prizefighter disappeared after one release.
Round4Round Boxing vanished before it launched.

If Undisputed can’t find a financially sustainable model, it could be the last boxing sim for another 10 years.

DLC is what keeps the realistic sim experience alive. It:

Fuels new boxer signings
Keeps the animation pipeline running
Pays for AI, career mode improvements, and servers
Shows investors that this genre has legs

Would you rather pay $5–10 for a boxer now… or see boxing disappear again until 2035?

7. How SCI Could Improve Communication

While the business reality is harsh, SCI could do better by:

Being more transparent about licensing costs
Bundling more value into DLCs (venues, gear, events)
Offering season passes for better fan budgeting
Explaining where the money goes in dev blogs
Including legacy boxer packages with career content

Many fans would be far more supportive if they saw exactly what their DLC money unlocked — and how it kept the game alive.

Final Thoughts: You’re Funding the Return of Sim Boxing

Let’s not romanticize the past or blame the wrong things.

DLC is not the problem. It’s the bridge between what fans want and what’s realistically possible. Without it, you lose:

Legendary boxers
Authentic representation
Career mode depth
AI improvements
Long-term developer support

So the next time you see a boxer behind a DLC label, don’t ask:

“Why are they charging me for this?”

Ask:

“Would this boxer even be possible without it?”

Boxing games don’t survive on nostalgia. They survive on support. DLC is part of that support.

Tuesday, July 22, 2025

The Hypnosis of Lowered Expectations: How Casual Fans and Developers Are Undermining the Vision of Realistic Boxing Games

The Hypnosis of Lowered Expectations: How Casual Fans and Developers Are Undermining the Vision of Realistic Boxing Games

Introduction: The Trance We're Being Sold

When Undisputed was first announced, it promised a revolution—a resurrection of boxing video games with a focus on realism, detail, and authenticity. For many of us, that pitch was a long-awaited answer to the void left behind by Fight Night Champion. We envisioned adaptive AI, dynamic damage, strategic pacing, and nuanced boxer styles. We imagined a game that respected boxing as both sport and science.

But somewhere along the way, things changed.

The message shifted from "We're building the most authentic boxing game ever" to "You’re asking for too much."
From "This is for real boxing fans" to "The casual audience needs something simpler."
From "We’re listening to your feedback" to "You guys are being negative."

And now? We're told to settle for the bare minimum, dressed up with marketing polish and patches.

This is not a coincidence. It’s a pattern. And whether intentional or not, it’s working like a form of hypnosis—a psychological manipulation of expectations—pushed by casual players and reinforced by hesitant developers who are afraid to commit to what the game was supposed to be.

Part 1: The Casual Fan Gaslight Loop

There’s a recurring cycle that’s being allowed to dominate the discourse:

Sim-focused fans ask for realistic features—footwork mechanics, real corner interaction, referee involvement, punch accuracy systems, fighting on the inside, and so on.
Casual players respond:

“That’s too much.”
“Nobody wants that.”
“It’s just a game.”
“You’re overthinking it.”
Developers quietly echo that thinking, choosing the path of least resistance—easier animations, faster pacing, one-size-fits-all mechanics.
Hardcore fans push back, asking what happened to the promised features.
They get labeled toxic, demanding, or impossible to please, while the casual crowd paints themselves as “the true community.”

And thus begins the hypnosis—a rewriting of what this game was supposed to be, until people forget that we were promised a sim, not a spam-fest.

Part 2: The Friendship Trojan Horse – Casual Fans Who Strategically Befriend You

This tactic deserves its own spotlight.

Some casual fans don’t just push their anti-sim opinions publicly—they strategically befriend sim-focused community members. They come off respectful, playful, non-confrontational at first. They talk about how they “respect all perspectives” or say they “used to want a sim too.”

But over time, their true goal becomes clear:

To change your mindset, not to understand it.
To nudge you gently into compromise until you start parroting their language:

“Maybe that is too hardcore.”
“I guess people do just want knockouts.”
“Perhaps we can meet halfway.”

These are not real conversations. These are subtle campaigns to wear you down, to make you feel isolated in your expectations, and to convince you that you’re the one being unreasonable.

It's psychological warfare wrapped in "friendly discussion."

They know the developers are listening, and they want to shift the Overton window of acceptable feedback. If they can get the loudest sim voices to soften, the rest will crumble. That’s how feature demands get watered down and rebranded as “complaining.”

Part 3: “Too Realistic” – The Coward’s Excuse

Let’s put this to rest:

“Too realistic” is code for “We don’t want to do the work.”

No one complains that NBA 2K includes stamina, playcalling, and franchise mechanics.
No one cries that FIFA has manager mode, scouting systems, and team chemistry.
And yet, when sim fans ask for footwork control, corner advice, or accurate punch tracking, we get told it’s too much.

Boxing is technical. It’s strategic. It’s punishing.
And it deserves a game that honors that depth.

Part 4: Developers Trapped by Fear (or Complacency)

We know many of the devs at Undisputed started with passion and purpose. But passion without courage fades into compromise.

They may fear that going full sim will alienate a casual base. They may worry about YouTubers calling the game “slow” or “too complex.” And so, they take the safe road:

Simplify stamina.
Drop inside fighting.
Water down clinching.
Make every boxer feel nearly identical.

In doing so, they’re not protecting the game—they’re starving it of the very identity that made people care.

Worse, they allow the loudest casual voices to define the direction, while silencing the ones who kept the boxing game dream alive for over a decade.

Part 5: The Casual Fan Is Not the Blueprint

Casual fans matter. But they cannot define a sim.

You cannot build authenticity on the opinions of people who don’t know what real boxing looks like beyond highlight reels.

They don’t want styles. They want explosions.
They don’t want rhythm. They want chaos.
They don’t want thinking. They want swinging.

That’s fine—for an arcade mode.

But you don’t erase the simulation to please people who never asked for one in the first place.

Part 6: You Were Promised More—Don’t Be Gaslit

Undisputed was supposed to change things. It wasn’t marketed as a toe-to-toe slugfest. It was pitched as the most realistic boxing game ever created.

It promised:

Distinct boxer styles
Clean and dirty tactics
Tactical movement and feints
Adaptive AI
Real damage systems
Clinch control
Intelligent referees
Real judging criteria

Now we’re told those are “maybe” features. “Eventually.” “If they make sense.”

No. These were core promises, not wishlist extras.

Conclusion: Break the Trance. Don’t Settle. Don’t Let Them Friend You Into Silence.

Casuals will say you’re too serious.
Developers will say it’s not feasible right now.
Friendly voices will say, “We can all just enjoy what we have.”

But you remember the pitch.
You know what this was supposed to be.
And you’re not crazy for wanting it.

You’re not too demanding.
You’re not toxic.
You’re not unrealistic.

You are the reason boxing games still have a pulse.

Don’t let false friendships, developer excuses, or mass hypnosis rewrite the standard. Don’t let the vision get hijacked by people who didn’t care until the game hit Steam.

If we let this slide, then realism dies here.
If we push back, we build something that lasts.

#RealBoxingGame
#UndisputedTruth
#NoMoreGaslight
#BoxingSimLoyalist
#StopTheTrance

Monday, July 21, 2025

Undisputed Boxing Game: What’s Been Delivered, Delayed, and Removed from the Original Roadmap (2020–2025)

FEATURES CURRENTLY IMPLEMENTED (as of July 2025)

Category	Feature	Status
Gameplay	Ranked Online Mode	✅ Fully live, active matchmaking, seasonal updates
	Stamina & damage systems	✅ Functional, though community feedback still cites balance concerns
	Signature movement styles (e.g. Ali shuffle, Tyson peek-a-boo)	✅ Implemented per boxer
	Real boxer roster (legends + current)	✅ Active, but some signed boxers unreleased
	Full punch control (feints, pivots, angles)	✅ Deep controls available
	Training System (Career Preview Mode)	✅ Text-sim style training camp system with choices affecting stats
	Ring announcer intros	✅ Present, though presentation depth is limited
	Basic practice mode	✅ Implemented

FEATURES THAT ARE DELAYED OR PARTIALLY IMPLEMENTED

These features were previously announced or teased by SCI but have either not launched yet, are partially implemented, or are awaiting polish in full release:

Feature	Status & Notes
Career Mode	⏳ Still in development. Will include fight scheduling, training, sponsorships, rankings, etc. No hands-on gameplay loop yet — current training is text-based and stat-driven
AI Boxer Behaviors & Tendencies	⏳ Not yet adaptive — AI logic does not reflect real-life styles or ring IQ in full
Referees in the Ring	❌ Removed — seen in early trailers, now absent from all versions
Clinching Mechanic	❌ Missing — originally teased with animations, not present in gameplay
Foul System (low blows, rabbit punches, illegal shots)	❌ No implementation yet — no warnings, no point deductions
Full Damage Model (cuts, swelling-based TKOs)	⏳ Present, but simplified — swelling and cuts exist, but stoppages are rare or scripted
Ring Walkouts & National Anthems	❌ Removed — no walk-ins, despite original vision trailers
Commentary System	❌ Absent — no live commentary system exists yet
Dynamic Cornermen Cutscenes	❌ Missing — corner sequences are static or skipped
Women’s Career Mode Path	⏳ Roster exists, but no career system for women yet
Training Minigames	❌ Not interactive like Fight Night — current training is text-based with menu choices and passive stat boosts
Stat Sliders & Gameplay Tuning Tools	❌ No in-game gameplay or AI sliders released to public
Boxer Behavior Traits	⏳ System exists behind the scenes, but not editable or exposed to players yet

FEATURES CONFIRMED AS REMOVED OR SCRAPPED

These were once listed on official roadmaps, dev interviews, or trailers, but have since been removed from all public-facing material or directly addressed as dropped.

Feature	Original Status	Current Verdict
Referee Mechanics (warnings, positioning)	Seen in early trailers	❌ Scrapped
Inside Fighting / Clinch Breaks	Discussed in early interviews	❌ Cut
Community Boxer Sharing (upload/download)	Initially pitched like WWE/2K	❌ Confirmed "no-go" by moderators
Narrative/Story Mode	Once teased as part of Career	❌ No longer referenced
Era-based broadcast filters / old-school overlays	Shown in early media	❌ Discarded
Walkout Cinematics	Appeared in reveal trailers	❌ Quietly removed
Full creation suite with sculpting, gear layers, tattoos	Once promised	❌ Downgraded — limited presets only
Spectator Mode	Mentioned in community discussions	❌ Not implemented
Dynamic corner advice with audio/video cutscenes	Once part of the realism promise	❌ Missing entirely

CLARITY ON THE TRAINING SYSTEM

The current training implementation in Undisputed is a text-sim model, similar to classic sports management games:

You choose between training types (sparring, roadwork, bag drills, rest).
These choices impact boxer attributes (power, stamina, recovery, etc.).
No interactive minigames like Fight Night’s heavy bag, speed bag, or reaction drills.
It’s menu-driven, designed to simulate camp strategy, not control it physically.

COMMUNITY AND MOD CONFIRMATIONS

Feature	Source or Note
Community Creation Sharing	Moderator "Mink King" confirmed it's “more than likely a no-go.”
Clinch & Referee	Removed from dev logs and no longer discussed
Sliders, AI Tools	Still requested by fans, no official update
Career Mode Release	Only mentioned as “coming later” with no release timeline

FINAL SUMMARY

Area	Summary Verdict
Online Features	✅ Functional, with Ranked and Casual matchmaking live
Career Mode	⏳ Delayed, currently in prototype via text-based training
Realism Features	❌ Referee, clinch, fouls, walkouts all removed
AI & Behavior Systems	⏳ Promised depth missing — no visible tendencies or traits
Customization	⚠️ Creation suite heavily downgraded, no sharing
Presentation & Commentary	❌ No dynamic commentary, ring intros are basic

The Blatant Disrespect from SCI Toward the Boxing Creation Suite Community

The Blatant Disrespect from SCI Toward the Boxing Creation Suite Community

A Broken Promise to the Lifeblood of Sports Games

When Steel City Interactive (SCI) first promised a boxing simulation game that would be the "NBA 2K of boxing," fans envisioned more than just a ring, punches, and licensed boxers. They envisioned a fully realized creation suite—a space where creativity could thrive, the history of boxing could be revived, and the community could breathe life into the game beyond the official roster.

But what happened instead? Silence. Backpedaling. Excuses. And now, the community creation mode—the same feature that was once listed on the roadmap—has seemingly been scrapped or indefinitely shelved. The message? "It would take away from the main objective right now." In other words: Your voice doesn't matter anymore.

Why the Creation Suite Matters More Than SCI Understands

1. It's the Foundation of Longevity

NBA 2K, WWE 2K, and even old games like Fight Night Round 3 thrive years after release because of user-generated content.
When official support fades, the creation community sustains interest and relevance.
A creation suite can provide thousands of boxers from all eras, including fantasy matchups and local legends—no extra licensing required.

2. It Empowers the Fans

The boxing community is passionate, knowledgeable, and driven. They don’t just want to play the game—they want to enhance it.
Community creators recreate iconic trunks, venues, commentary styles, classic stances, and even full fictional leagues.
SCI’s refusal to support this sends a clear signal: "We want your money, not your ideas."

3. It Makes Up for Licensing Gaps

SCI can’t and won’t sign every legend or active fighter. But a good creation suite bridges that gap.
Fans could create a fully fleshed-out roster of real-life boxers SCI doesn’t have rights to.
It helps avoid repetitiveness and deepens the game’s ecosystem with endless matchups.

The Community Was Sold a Dream, Then Ghosted

SCI heavily implied early on that customization and creation would be part of the future of Undisputed. Content creators hyped it up. Fans waited patiently. The roadmap even referenced customization features. And yet, when fans now ask, they’re told it’s “too much work.”

That’s unacceptable for a game in development since at least 2019. Especially when indie developers and modders can build full creation suites with far fewer resources. SCI has investors. They have a publishing partner. They’ve sold over a million copies. They are no longer a scrappy, resource-starved team—they’re just making choices.

And one of those choices was disrespecting the very community that made their game viral in the first place.

What SCI Should Have Done (and Still Can Do)

Be Transparent

If the creation suite is delayed, say it. If it’s canceled, say it. Don’t gaslight the community with vague statements.

Open It Up to Modders

Allow community access and PC modding tools like 2K and Bethesda do. Let the community carry the torch.

Hire Dedicated Creators

Bring in UI/UX designers and community managers who specialize in content creation tools.
There's a laid-off talent pool in the industry—hire them.

Launch It in Phases

Release a basic version first (trunks, gloves, tattoos), then layer in stances, entrances, venues, etc.
Iterative development is better than complete abandonment.

Final Thoughts: This Isn’t Just About a Feature—It’s About Respect

The boxing creation suite community isn’t just asking for fun tools. They're demanding the right to keep boxing's rich history alive, to immortalize legends SCI didn’t license, and to create the stories the game developers won’t.

SCI has turned its back on that dream. But it’s not too late to course correct. The blueprint exists. The community is still here. And the message is loud and clear:

If you won't give us the tools, we'll give our money and time to someone who will.

Sunday, July 20, 2025

Why Isn’t Turki Alalshikh Involved with the Undisputed Boxing Game?

Why Isn’t Turki Alalshikh Involved with the Undisputed Boxing Game?

An In-Depth Look at Missed Opportunities, Investment Potential, and Fan Frustration

Introduction

Turki Alalshikh is a major figure in the boxing world, not just as a fan but as a power broker. As the Chairman of the Saudi General Entertainment Authority, he’s reshaped modern boxing with mega-events, crossover fights, and historic purses. So naturally, many boxing fans are asking:
“Why isn’t Turki involved with the Undisputed boxing game?”

Given his passion for boxing, access to top talent, and nearly unlimited financial resources, his absence from the game’s development or promotion raises serious questions. Could his involvement have transformed Undisputed into the definitive boxing sim?

1. Funding Power Could Have Transformed the Project

Turki’s financial influence is undeniable:

He bankrolls massive events like Fury vs. Ngannou and Joshua vs. Usyk.
He funds entertainment and esports initiatives that aim to elevate global perception of Saudi Arabia.

If he had invested in Undisputed:

The game could’ve hired elite-level developers, AI engineers, and animation studios.
Full motion capture of legends (even retired ones) could’ve been done via estate rights and AI reconstruction tools.
Historic arenas, walkouts, and real fight commentary could’ve been implemented at launch, not promised as future updates.

2. Why Was Turki Not Brought In? Or Did He Decline?

There are two possible scenarios here:

A. Steel City Interactive (SCI) never approached him.

If true, that reflects a lack of ambition or vision. Turki has a track record of funding culturally important projects. Not presenting a pitch to him may have been a strategic failure by SCI — especially when they were marketing the game as the “NBA 2K of Boxing.”

B. Turki was approached but didn’t like the direction.

This is more likely, especially if:

He saw the game leaning toward arcade mechanics.
He noticed the absence of key features (clinching, referees, true AI tendencies).
He perceived the game as not representing boxing authentically — something he fiercely defends in the real sport.

If SCI pitched a game that didn’t live up to the sport's depth and legacy, Turki may have pulled back. He wouldn’t put his name or funding behind something that feels like a "fighting game with boxing gloves" instead of a boxing simulation.

3. The Missing Link: No Boxers, Trainers, or Historians in Key Roles

Turki surrounds himself with boxers, historians, and coaches for his events. Fans noticed that:

Undisputed lacked boxing insiders in development.
Features promised early on (like deep strategy, ring IQ, corner dynamics) have been delayed or downgraded.

Had Turki gotten involved, he likely would have demanded:

Real trainers are involved in punch logic and style-building.
Historians to curate authentic boxer tendencies and presentation.
An in-house boxing council, ensuring the game was a love letter to the sport, not a flashy fighter fest.

4. Ali’s Exclusivity Deal Likely Didn’t Matter to Turki

Some speculate that Turki didn’t get involved because SCI has exclusive rights to Muhammad Ali until 2037. But fans forget — Turki doesn’t need Ali to make a historic boxing game. He has access to:

Tyson Fury, Anthony Joshua, Canelo, Usyk, and younger stars like Jared Anderson.
Legendary trainers, commentators, and venues across eras.
His own events, with high production value and cinematic walkouts.

He could’ve created an entirely new game — or backed another studio — without Ali and still built a more authentic boxing experience than Undisputed currently offers.

5. Fans Are Losing Faith in SCI — Turki’s Absence Fuels That

SCI sold the dream of a sim boxing game, only to deliver an early-access product that leans heavily on arcade. As updates trickle in slowly and features feel stripped down, fans wonder:

"Would this have happened if Turki were involved?"

Many believe his:

High standards,
No-nonsense approach to quality,
And deep love for boxing
would’ve forced SCI to stay aligned with realism and fan expectations.

🔚 Conclusion: A Missed Alliance That Could Still Happen?

Turki Alalshikh’s absence from Undisputed feels like a missed opportunity. Whether it was SCI’s failure to approach him properly or his own decision to avoid a game that lacked authentic boxing DNA, the result is the same:

Fans are left wondering what could’ve been.

But all hope isn’t lost. If SCI course-corrects, shows real commitment to sim realism, and puts boxing first, perhaps Turki could be convinced to invest, support, or even spearhead a new game project.

One thing is clear:
Boxing games need visionaries who care about the sport.
And Turki Alalshikh is exactly that.

If the Giants Stepped in the Ring: What a Boxing Game Would Look Like From the Top 10 Gaming Powerhouses

1. 2K Sports / Visual Concepts – The True Simulation Standard

Philosophy:

Visual Concepts has dominated the sports simulation scene with NBA 2K, known for its realism, career storytelling, custom sliders, and deep player customization. If they built a boxing game, expect a simulation-first design ethos.

Mechanics:

Dynamic Stamina & Movement System: Footwork and fatigue dynamically change punch output, slipping ability, and reaction times. Based on 2K’s stamina/turbo bars and attribute decay system.
Tendency System: Just like how each NBA player behaves according to real-life habits, boxers would have offensive/defensive styles, engagement rhythms, and punch preferences.
Ring Generalship AI: AI boxers would cut off the ring, trap you, or pivot away depending on their IQ and style settings (e.g., slickster, swarmer, stalker).

Features:

MyBoxer Career Mode: Player rises from amateur to champion with:
- Voice-acted cutscenes, rivalries, sparring, endorsements.
- Branching path choices: accept shady promoter or stay loyal to the gym?
- Legacy System: create a family of boxers or gym lineage.
The Gym (Online World Hub): Think The City in NBA 2K, but boxing-themed. Training, sparring, online tournaments, and gear shops.
Creation Suite: One of the most robust. Face scan, tattoos, signature punches, ring attire, coaches, and gym customization.
Fight IQ Slider Set: AI customization sliders for tendencies, risk tolerance, and adaptability.

Weakness:

Heavy microtransaction push, particularly in Career/Online.
Potentially bloated UI and feature creep without meaningful gameplay changes.

2. EA Sports (EA Vancouver) – The Blockbuster Hybrid

Philosophy:

EA Sports is known for polished, accessible titles that combine slick presentation with arcade-leaning gameplay and monetization layers (e.g., UFC 5, FIFA/FC, Madden).

Mechanics:

Animation Priority System: Borrowing from Fight Night Champion and UFC, striking would be smooth, but it prioritizes visual fidelity over true input precision.
Knockout Physics Engine: Rag-doll knockouts return, but would likely lack real balance or weight-shifting mechanics unless built from scratch.
Flash KO Window: Based on momentum, not punch accuracy or setup — risky for realism.

Features:

Legacy Mode Reboot: Includes an ESPN-style career documentary, training minigames, and classic boxers.
Ultimate Team Boxing: Loot-box model with boxer cards and attribute boosts.
Live Events Mode: Tie-ins with real boxing events for fantasy matchups.
Presentation: Best-in-class. Real licensed arenas, broadcast packages, commentary duos, and fighter intros.

Weakness:

Gameplay is likely to be style over substance without an internal push for simulation.
Pay-to-win mechanics are baked into online content.
Focus groups over fighter input.

3. Sony San Diego (MLB The Show) – The Stat-Driven Sleeper Pick

Philosophy:

A perfectionist studio that champions statistical realism, user agency, and legacy preservation. MLB The Show is a model of balance between old-school authenticity and modern engagement.

Mechanics:

Sim-First Ring Control: AI uses angles, cuts distance with weight shifts, and pressures with purpose. Tied to boxers’ ratings, rhythm, and ring control stats.
Stamina, Body Work & Recovery System: Body punches reduce stamina, but also affect round-to-round recovery (like arm fatigue in pitching).
Training Load Management: Overtrain, and your boxer enters overtrained status, similar to fatigue tracking in MLB The Show’s franchise mode.

Features:

Boxing Universe Mode: Manages multiple careers at once. Fighters age, decline, retire, and new talent emerges. Heavy emphasis on sim-style longevity.
Road to Glory: Player career with scouting, amateur tournaments, gym invites.
Authentic Roster Creation Tools: Boxer creator tools rivaling WWE 2K and NBA 2K.

Weakness:

Not as flashy in marketing or cutscenes. Their games are loved more for what they do than how they look.
May not be given the budget by Sony unless there’s major demand.

4. Ubisoft – The Boxing RPG Hybrid

Philosophy:

Ubisoft’s games revolve around open-world progression, modular upgrades, and player narrative immersion. Think Assassin’s Creed or The Crew 2, but boxing-focused.

Mechanics:

XP-Based Boxer Progression: You level up punch speed, combos, reflexes, and traits like “Late Round Warrior” or “Glass Chin.”
Dialogue Trees & Choices: Pick rivalries, business paths, and trainers that shape your career.
Gear-Based Attribute Buffs: Gloves, wraps, and boots that influence gameplay.

Features:

Open World Boxing RPG: Travel to gyms around the world (Brooklyn, Tokyo, Cuba, Manchester), accept side missions, underground fights, or licensed promotions.
Faction Alignment: Join different management factions (WBC-type vs independent fighters union) that affect matchmaking and training access.
Narrative Over Sim Depth: You fight for story impact, not sim stats.

Weakness:

Not for sim purists. Focused more on RPG elements than boxing accuracy.
Ubi’s “bloat” design may result in undercooked mechanics or shallow AI.

5. Rockstar Games – Boxing as Crime, Drama, and Survival

Philosophy:

Narrative depth, slow-paced realism, world immersion. A Rockstar boxing game wouldn’t just be about boxing — it would be about the life of a boxer.

Mechanics:

Realistic Pace: Every jab matters. Every clinch counts. Footwork is heavy, and breath is audible.
Emotional Systems: You fight angry, scared, and focused. AI reads tendencies.
Damage Carries Over: Scar tissue builds. Eye swelling worsens. Surgeries needed between fights.

Features:

Story-Driven Career: Set in the 1950s or 1980s. Rags-to-riches tale where you deal with mob-run gyms, corrupt promoters, and fame vs loyalty.
Open World: Explore gyms, sparring, and social clubs. Take shady side gigs to fund training.
Press Conferences, Scandals, Legacy: Your choices off-screen affect title shots, fanbase, and fight difficulty.

Weakness:

Combat may feel slow or too grounded for some fans.
Would likely not be released annually or even on a regular cycle. High cost and long dev time.

6. CD Projekt Red – The Boxing RPG Epic

Philosophy:

Ambitious RPGs that explore moral grey zones, customization, and choice-based storytelling. Think Cyberpunk 2077 with a boxing twist.

Mechanics:

Dialogue-Tied Rivalries: Start psychological wars with other boxers. Sabotage or uplift.
Perk Trees: Power punches, defensive counters, ring generalship.
Trait Consequences: “Chinny” or “Arrogant” can lock or unlock career branches.

Features:

World Map System: Visit trainers and promoters with specific philosophies. (e.g., Mexican school, Philly gym).
Cybernetic or Post-War Setting: This could involve boxing in a post-collapse world, with bare-knuckle tournaments or futuristic fight circuits.
Deep Lore: Flashbacks to childhood, legacy gym management, and ancestral champions.

Weakness:

Not simulation-focused unless directed by boxing consultants.
Likely to go beyond realism unless clearly scoped.

7. Capcom – Arcade King with Combo Precision

Philosophy:

Responsive controls, combo strings, and fighting game logic. Could deliver a competitive arcade boxing experience that rewards fast reflexes and pattern memorization.

Mechanics:

Meter System: Build super punches, clinch escapes, or dodges.
Parry Windows: Perfect input for slow-motion counterattack.
Frame Advantage & Hit Stun: Fighting game logic adapted to boxing.

Features:

Fictional Roster: Iconic characters with over-the-top specials.
Local Multiplayer & Esports: Fast fights, ranked ladders, pro controller support.
Cartoon or Cell-Shaded Style: Anime-style visuals like Power Stone or Street Fighter Alpha.

Weakness:

No realism or sim appeal. Completely stylized.

8. Bandai Namco – Anime Meets the Ring

Philosophy:

Strong in blending anime storytelling and kinetic fight systems (e.g., Dragon Ball FighterZ, Tekken, Hajime no Ippo games).

Mechanics:

Cinematic Super Moves: Body shot finishers, slow-motion dodges.
Spirit Gauge: Momentum-based system that influences power punches.
Stance Swapping: Some boxers switch dynamically with flair.

Features:

Hajime no Ippo Licensed Game: Could integrate full manga storyline, boss battles, iconic techniques.
Training Arc Mechanics: Mini-games to learn special techniques like Liver Blow or Dempsey Roll.
Story Campaign: Would rival an anime season in drama and presentation.

Weakness:

More for anime fans and stylized fans than true boxing purists.

Final Summary Table

Studio	Likely Style	Best Strength	Biggest Risk
2K Sports	Realistic Sim	Tendency depth, MyCareer	Monetization
EA Sports	Sim/Arcade Hybrid	Visuals, presentation	Pay-to-win, shallow sim
Sony San Diego	Stat-based Sim	Longevity, stat realism	Less cinematic
Ubisoft	RPG Hybrid	Open world, story	Lacks sim authenticity
Rockstar	Gritty Narrative	Immersive world, slow sim	Not for casuals
CD Projekt	RPG Sandbox	Perks, lore, customization	Not a sim
Capcom	Fighting Game	Tight input, competitive	Unrealistic
Bandai Namco	Anime Hybrid	Presentation, flair	Not sim-focused

Undisputed Could Still Be the Game Fans Were Promised—If Steel City Interactive Uses Today’s Technology and Hires the Right People

Boxing fans didn’t ask for the impossible — they asked for a boxing simulation that accurately represents the sport, its greats, its mechanics, and its strategy. Steel City Interactive (SCI) promised realism. They marketed Undisputed as the NBA 2K of boxing, using buzzwords like “sim” and “authenticity” to attract the hardcore fanbase.

And now? Many of those features remain absent, delayed, or outright ignored. But here’s the truth:

Every major feature boxing fans want is absolutely possible with today’s technology. The only thing standing in the way is poor leadership, the wrong development team, and misaligned priorities.

I. Technology in 2025 Can Easily Support Fan Expectations

Fan Feature	Technologically Feasible?	Engine/Tools to Use
Tendencies & AI Styles	✅ Yes	Unity ML-Agents Toolkit / Unreal Behavior Trees & Blackboards
Clinching, Inside Fighting, Referee Logic	✅ Yes	Unreal Engine 5 Motion Warping, Full Body IK (e.g., DragonIK), Root Motion
Ring Generalship / Footwork Battles	✅ Yes	UE5 AnimGraph + NavMesh zones + Custom Footwork Controllers
Chained Body Punches	✅ Yes	Blend Trees, Animation Montages, Timeline or Sequencer (Unity Timeline or UE5 Sequencer)
Realistic Knockdowns / Get-Ups	✅ Yes	Chaos Physics + Input Timing Systems (UE5), Procedural Pose Matching
Commentary & Crowd Layers	✅ Yes	FMOD / Wwise (Audio Middleware), Trigger Layering
Legacy Boxer Capture (Retired/Deceased)	✅ Yes	DeepMotion, Dynamixyz, FaceWare, RADiCAL Motion AI, Reallusion Headshot, MetaHuman Animator
Creation Suite with Mod Support	✅ Yes	Unity Editor Scripting / UE5 Editor Utility Widgets, Save-Load JSON, Steam Workshop APIs
Dynamic Career Ecosystem	✅ Yes	ScriptableObjects (Unity), DataTables (UE5), Simulation Layers, Time-based Event Systems

II. Reviving or Capturing Historic & Deceased Boxers (Ali, Louis, etc.)

Even if a boxer is no longer alive or can’t perform for mocap, SCI can still capture their style and likeness realistically using modern tools:

Performance & Motion Tech:

DeepMotion – AI-powered markerless motion capture from video footage.
RADiCAL Motion – Converts 2D/3D video into motion data usable in Unity/UE5.
MetaHuman Animator (Epic Games) – Animates facial and body data from reference footage or still photos.
FaceWare / Dynamixyz – Facial capture systems from legacy footage.
Reallusion Headshot & Character Creator – Used to generate authentic 3D head models from historic images.

By analyzing old fight footage or high-quality images, SCI could recreate legendary fighters down to their mannerisms, stance shifts, and signature techniques, just like 2K did with Michael Jordan and Kobe Bryant.

III. It’s Not the Tools — It’s the Team

The missing ingredient isn't technology — it's talent and intent.

SCI Needs to Hire:

Role	Why It’s Critical
Boxing Historians & Trainers	To guide animations, AI logic, trait definitions, and realism
AI Engineers (ML/Behavior Trees)	For adaptive boxing styles, ring IQ, simulation logic
Combat Animators	To build fluid and reactive transitions between punches, blocks, and clinches
Gameplay Designers with Sports Sim Backgrounds	To implement sliders, ratings, modifiers, fatigue curves, and career logic
Audio Designers with Middleware Experience	To layer chants, commentary, and coach cues
Tools Programmers	For UI systems like Creation Suite, Trait Sliders, or Tendency Editors

SCI’s hiring history shows too many former EA arcade-focused developers and too few 2K-style sim designers. That imbalance shows in the product.

IV. What SCI Could Build Today (No Excuses)

System	Description
Tendency-Based AI System	Boxers fight like themselves using sliders (pressure, countering, feints, ring control) — powered by Unity ML-Agents or Unreal EQS/Blackboards
Dynamic Career Ecosystem	Over 100 boxers per division, with rankings, fatigue, damage carryover, gym choices, retirement, comeback arcs
Boxer Trait Editor	Sliders + dropdowns defining traits like “Dazzling Jab,” “Glass Body,” “Dangerous When Hurt”
Legacy Capture System	Scan real fight footage and reconstruct dead boxers with AI-assisted animation tools
Creation Suite + Mod Sharing	Templates for body types, stances, voice, ring walks, corner teams, and ability to download/share on console and PC
Real-Time Commentary Engine	Commentary shifts depending on momentum, fatigue, corner instructions, or taunts

V. What Other Games Already Do (SCI Should Learn From)

NBA 2K: Signature tendencies, player builder, deep career paths.
UFC 5: Real-time physics knockdowns, damage tracking, and style-based AI.
WWE 2K: Creation Suite, full character logic sliders, modding support.
Football Manager: Simulates thousands of fighters/staff across decades with evolving world states.

There’s no justifiable reason Undisputed can’t do the same, especially when it sold itself as “for the hardcore boxing fan.”

The Technology Exists. The Time is Now.

“Don’t let developers tell you it’s not possible. Everything fans want — from deep AI, legacy boxer preservation, clinching, creation tools, dynamic rankings, to realistic physics — is entirely doable in 2025. They just have to care enough to build it.”

If SCI refuses to:

Hire the right developers
Consult real boxers/trainers
Invest in tools already used across the industry
Build the vision that fans bought into...

Then they’re not a visionary sim company — they’re another pretender using the sport of boxing to sell a half-finished arcade fighter.

Acquiring Boxers from All Eras Shouldn’t Be a Challenge for Major Game Studios

Introduction: Boxing’s Rich History Is a Goldmine—Not a Barrier

When people say that licensing issues make it too difficult to build a great boxing game, they’re either misinformed or missing the bigger picture. The reality is that acquiring a diverse roster of boxers—past and present—shouldn’t be a major obstacle for a well-funded game company. Boxing is one of the richest sports in history in terms of talent, global reach, and iconic personalities. A publisher like 2K, EA, or even an ambitious newcomer with proper funding has the means and flexibility to secure a compelling lineup across all weight classes and eras.

1. Boxing Has a Massive Talent Pool Across Every Era

From the bare-knuckle pioneers to modern pay-per-view stars, the sport of boxing is loaded with recognizable and marketable names. No single fighter, promotion, or time period dominates the landscape. This means a developer could cherry-pick talent from:

Golden Era Legends: Joe Louis, Rocky Marciano, Sugar Ray Robinson, Archie Moore
Modern Icons: Mike Tyson, Oscar De La Hoya, Lennox Lewis, Roy Jones Jr., Floyd Mayweather
Today’s Stars: Canelo Álvarez, Tyson Fury, Naoya Inoue, Terence Crawford, Errol Spence Jr.
International Champions: Manny Pacquiao, Oleksandr Usyk, Vasyl Lomachenko, Julio César Chávez
Fan Favorites & Cult Heroes: Arturo Gatti, Prince Naseem Hamed, Fernando Vargas, Ricky Hatton

This variety means a game can be crafted around a well-balanced ecosystem, not a single name.

2. Most Boxers Aren’t Tied to Long-Term Exclusivity Deals

Contrary to belief, the majority of professional boxers, including many legends, are not locked into permanent licensing agreements. Even those that are often have estates or promotional companies that are willing to negotiate. Licensing individual boxers may take effort, but it’s not beyond the scope of a major publisher’s resources, especially when you consider that:

Promotions (Top Rank, PBC, Golden Boy, etc.) often control multiple fighters and can open doors quickly.
Many past boxers’ likeness rights are managed by families or estate managers who are open to commercial opportunities.
Current boxers are increasingly interested in cross-media exposure and long-term branding.

A studio with industry clout and funding can easily initiate and complete these agreements.

3. Major Publishers Have a Proven Track Record With Licensing

2K and EA have already shown their ability to secure massive rosters in other sports genres:

NBA 2K features historical rosters, All-Time teams, and likenesses going back decades.
WWE 2K includes hundreds of characters spanning multiple eras, promotions, and even fictional or posthumous portrayals.
Madden NFL and FIFA negotiate with leagues, unions, and retired player associations—far more complex ecosystems than boxing.

Boxing, while fragmented, is not as legally complex as global team sports. It’s about direct licensing or working with a few promotional partners, not an international governing body.

4. A Star Roster Is About Curation, Not Just Popularity

A great boxing game doesn’t need every boxer to be a global household name. It needs:

A curated selection of stylistically diverse fighters
Matchups that span eras and weight divisions
Boxers with unique looks, stories, and fighting styles

From slick counterpunchers to brawlers, from heavyweights to flyweights, a carefully chosen roster can reflect the full personality of the sport. Games like Fight Night Round 3 and Victorious Boxers proved that even with limited licensing, compelling rosters can still create incredible player experiences.

5. Community Tools Can Fill the Gaps

Even without every boxer under contract, modern creation suites allow for a thriving community to:

Recreate legends using custom tools and sliders
Build out full rosters of fictional or tribute fighters
Share and download edits across platforms

If a developer supports modding or user creations, the roster can grow beyond what’s officially licensed. It’s what kept games like WWE 2K and NBA 2K alive long after release.

6. Steel City Interactive Can’t Corner the Market

Steel City Interactive, despite selling over a million copies of Undisputed, is still a relatively small studio. They don’t have the resources to sign every legend, every modern star, or every rising prospect. If a company like 2K decided to enter the space, it could easily out-license SCI by offering:

Better royalties and visibility
Cross-promotional opportunities
A higher-quality platform and fanbase reach

The market is open. The history is deep. The time is right.

Conclusion: The Roster Is Out There—You Just Have to Build It

Acquiring a robust boxing roster isn’t an impossible dream—it’s just a matter of commitment. The sport’s legacy is long, its stars are plenty, and its fanbase is hungry for something real. Developers shouldn’t be scared off by licensing myths or the illusion that one name can gatekeep the genre.

If a company truly respects the sport and is willing to invest, the roster will come, era by era, star by star.