Friday, February 14, 2025

Is The Boxing Videogame Blueprint/Wishlist Site (Realistic/Sim) Blog the Ultimate Blueprint for a Boxing Video Game?

Boxing video games have long struggled to capture the depth, strategy, and realism that make the sport so compelling. While some titles have come close, many fall short in key areas, either leaning too arcade-like or failing to flesh out fundamental aspects of the sport. However, The Boxing Videogame Blueprint/Wishlist Site (Realistic/Sim) blog presents a comprehensive vision that could serve as the ultimate foundation for a boxing simulation game. https://boxinggamewishlist.blogspot.com/

A Deep Dive into the Wishlist Site

The blog is more than just a wishlist—it’s an extensive blueprint that covers every conceivable aspect of a boxing video game, from gameplay mechanics to career mode depth, customization, physics, AI behavior, and beyond. What makes it stand out is its commitment to realism, ensuring that every element of the sport is properly represented in the virtual ring.

Some key areas that the blog meticulously details include:

Weight Classes and Customization
Unlike many boxing games that limit divisions, the wishlist emphasizes the inclusion of all weight classes for men and women, including junior, super, and even bridge weight categories. It also offers the option for players to customize or create weight divisions to reflect different eras in boxing history.
Boxer Styles, Movement, and Mechanics
The site doesn’t just suggest adding different fighting styles—it breaks down the nuances of each, from punch trajectories to footwork, clinching, and defensive postures. Realism is at the forefront, with detailed proposals on how boxers should react to being hit, lose balance from wild swings, and even get tangled in the ropes.
Career Mode & Story Integration
Many boxing games suffer from shallow career modes that lack immersion. The blog presents an expansive career mode concept where players can manage all aspects of a boxer’s journey—training, hiring trainers, signing contracts, dealing with promoters, and building a career narrative that changes based on choices. Additionally, it envisions a dynamic Story Mode where players can take on different roles, such as a boxer, trainer, or promoter, with branching paths that intertwine with other characters.
CPU and AI Realism
One of the biggest flaws in past boxing games is unrealistic AI behavior. The wishlist proposes CPU-controlled boxers that not only fight according to their real-life tendencies but also adapt strategically, making AI-controlled bouts feel like actual boxing matches rather than robotic exchanges.
Customization and Content Depth
From Create-A-Boxer features rivaling WWE 2K’s deep creation suite to allowing players to craft their own nicknames and names with AI commentary support, the wishlist ensures an unprecedented level of personalization. It also suggests adding a vast selection of training mini-games, auto-simulation options, and managerial aspects for a fully fleshed-out experience.

Should Developers Use This Site as a Blueprint?

Absolutely. Game developers looking to create a truly immersive and authentic boxing experience would be wise to take inspiration from this blog. Instead of focusing solely on licensing real-life boxers, the wishlist emphasizes gameplay, mechanics, and realism—elements that are far more important in the long run. The blog’s approach would not only satisfy hardcore boxing fans but also create a game that stands the test of time.

One of the most important takeaways from the wishlist is its refusal to compromise realism for accessibility. It believes that realism itself is fun when executed correctly, and that a deep, strategic boxing game can still be enjoyable for casual players if designed properly.

Conclusion

If a game studio wants to create the definitive boxing simulation, The Boxing Videogame Blueprint/Wishlist Site (Realistic/Sim) is the ideal roadmap. It provides a level of depth and detail unmatched by any existing boxing game, tackling nearly every aspect needed to make a true-to-life boxing experience. Whether it's a major studio or an independent developer, this blog offers the perfect foundation for what could be the greatest boxing game ever made.

The question isn’t whether game companies should use this blueprint—it’s why they haven’t already.

Is The Boxing Videogame Blueprint/Wishlist Site (Realistic/Sim) Blog the Ultimate Blueprint for a Boxing Video Game?

A Deep Dive into the Wishlist Site

Some key areas that the blog meticulously details include:

Weight Classes and Customization
Unlike many boxing games that limit divisions, the wishlist emphasizes the inclusion of all weight classes for men and women, including junior, super, and even bridge weight categories. It also offers the option for players to customize or create weight divisions to reflect different eras in boxing history.
Boxer Styles, Movement, and Mechanics
The site doesn’t just suggest adding different fighting styles—it breaks down the nuances of each, from punch trajectories to footwork, clinching, and defensive postures. Realism is at the forefront, with detailed proposals on how boxers should react to being hit, lose balance from wild swings, and even get tangled in the ropes.
Career Mode & Story Integration
Many boxing games suffer from shallow career modes that lack immersion. The blog presents an expansive career mode concept where players can manage all aspects of a boxer’s journey—training, hiring trainers, signing contracts, dealing with promoters, and building a career narrative that changes based on choices. Additionally, it envisions a dynamic Story Mode where players can take on different roles, such as a boxer, trainer, or promoter, with branching paths that intertwine with other characters.
CPU and AI Realism
One of the biggest flaws in past boxing games is unrealistic AI behavior. The wishlist proposes CPU-controlled boxers that not only fight according to their real-life tendencies but also adapt strategically, making AI-controlled bouts feel like actual boxing matches rather than robotic exchanges.
Customization and Content Depth
From Create-A-Boxer features rivaling WWE 2K’s deep creation suite to allowing players to craft their own nicknames and names with AI commentary support, the wishlist ensures an unprecedented level of personalization. It also suggests adding a vast selection of training mini-games, auto-simulation options, and managerial aspects for a fully fleshed-out experience.

Should Developers Use This Site as a Blueprint?

Conclusion

The question isn’t whether game companies should use this blueprint—it’s why they haven’t already.

Wednesday, February 12, 2025

Ash Habib, Don't Let Boxing Fans Down: Take Control of Undisputed's Direction

For years, boxing fans have yearned for a true-to-life simulation that captures the sweet science in all its complexity. When Undisputed was first announced as ESBC, it was heralded as the game that would finally give the sport its due justice. It was supposed to be a game made by boxing fans for boxing fans, but somewhere along the way, that vision seems to have faded.

Ash Habib, this was your project, your vision, and the reason boxing fans rallied behind you and Steel City Interactive in the first place. But now, many are questioning whether you have relinquished control or allowed others to dilute the essence of what was promised. Have outside influences or members of your team altered your direction? Because what we are seeing now feels like a compromise—a game struggling to maintain its identity rather than the revolutionary boxing sim we were promised. A boxing game for boxing fans by boxing fans.

What Happened to the Vision?

When the game was still called ESBC, it had fans excited with promises of deep simulation, authentic movement, and a commitment to realism. The gameplay teasers showed glimpses of greatness, featuring footwork that looked smooth, defensive mechanics that rewarded skill, and a roster filled with legends and modern stars.

But over time, as the game transitioned into Undisputed, concerns grew. Features that once defined its uniqueness were altered or removed. Instead of a hardcore simulation, we’ve seen a shift towards accessibility—one that seems to undermine the realism that boxing fans crave.

Many fans feel that Undisputed has lost its way. The mechanics have changed, the weight and impact of punches feel off, and elements that could have made the game a true simulation—like realistic AI tendencies, clinching dynamics, proper footwork limitations, and distinct fighter identities—seem to have taken a backseat.

The Hardcore Boxing Fanbase Feels Betrayed

The game was supposed to be a beacon for boxing purists, a title that understood the nuances of the sport. But instead, we are seeing something that seems to be catering to a more casual audience, leaving behind the very fans who championed its rise. This isn't about being "hard to play" or "too complex." This is about getting boxing right.

Other sports games, like NBA 2K and EA FC, have simulation elements that let hardcore fans enjoy depth while still offering modes for casual players. Why should Undisputed be any different? There should be a way to balance both, but not at the expense of realism.

Ash, It’s Not Too Late

The trust of the boxing gaming community is still within reach, but action needs to be taken before it’s too late. Ash, take back the reins. Reaffirm your vision and let the community know that you’re still fighting for the game we all believed in. If someone on your team convinced you to shift direction, reconsider that decision. Listen to the fans who have been vocal about what they truly want.

We don’t need compromises or watered-down gameplay. We need Undisputed to be the boxing simulation it was meant to be. The dream is still alive—but only if you take control and bring it back on course.

Ash Habib, Don't Let Boxing Fans Down: Take Control of Undisputed's Direction

What Happened to the Vision?

The Hardcore Boxing Fanbase Feels Betrayed

Ash, It’s Not Too Late

Tuesday, February 11, 2025

Don't Dismiss Ideas Just Because They Seem AI-Generated—They Might Be Great

Don't Dismiss Ideas Just Because They Seem AI-Generated—They Might Be Great

The rise of AI-generated content has sparked debates in many circles, particularly in creative and idea-driven spaces. Some people hesitate to engage with suggestions or proposals if they suspect they were written by AI, assuming that such ideas lack depth, originality, or true understanding. But dismissing ideas solely because they might be AI-generated could mean overlooking some truly valuable insights.

Ideas Matter More Than the Source

At the end of the day, what matters most is the quality of the idea, not who—or what—wrote it. If an idea is strong, innovative, and well thought out, it deserves consideration, regardless of whether it came from a person, an AI, or a combination of both. AI-generated text is simply a tool—one that can help organize thoughts, refine arguments, and present concepts in a clear way.

If we only judge the source rather than the substance, we risk shutting ourselves off from potentially great ideas. There have been countless cases in history where groundbreaking insights came from unexpected places. Just because something was written with AI assistance doesn't automatically make it less valuable.

AI Can Help Shape Creativity, Not Replace It

AI doesn’t create in a vacuum—it processes and restructures existing knowledge, making it a helpful tool for brainstorming. People still play a crucial role in refining, expanding, and implementing those ideas. In many cases, AI can provide a fresh perspective, offering solutions that might not have been considered otherwise.

For example, in game development, sports analysis, business strategies, and even storytelling, AI can contribute ideas that spark further human creativity. Instead of dismissing AI-generated ideas outright, they should be evaluated on their merits—just like any human-generated suggestion.

A Collaborative Future

Rather than seeing AI-generated ideas as something to reject outright, we should embrace them as part of a broader creative process. The real magic happens when human intuition, experience, and critical thinking merge with AI’s ability to analyze vast amounts of information quickly.

If we start evaluating ideas based on their content rather than their origin, we create a more open and productive space for innovation. Whether an idea is written by AI or a person, it should be judged on its practicality, creativity, and potential impact—not on assumptions about how it was generated.

So, the next time you come across a suggestion that seems AI-generated, don't be too quick to dismiss it. It might just be exactly the idea you were looking for.

Don't Dismiss Ideas Just Because They Seem AI-Generated—They Might Be Great

Don't Dismiss Ideas Just Because They Seem AI-Generated—They Might Be Great

Ideas Matter More Than the Source

AI Can Help Shape Creativity, Not Replace It

A Collaborative Future

So, the next time you come across a suggestion that seems AI-generated, don't be too quick to dismiss it. It might just be exactly the idea you were looking for.

Saturday, February 8, 2025

Global Dream Team: The Best Hires to Create the Most Realistic Boxing Video Game

To create the most realistic boxing video game, the best hires should come from various parts of the world, depending on their expertise in different areas of game development, combat sports, and technology. Here’s a deep dive into the ideal global talent pool based on industry strengths:

1. Game Development & Simulation Physics

United Kingdom (UK) & Canada

Why? The UK and Canada have some of the best simulation-based game development studios.
Notable Studios & Talent Pools:
- Codemasters (UK) – Experts in physics-based racing games like F1 and Dirt, which require high-level physics accuracy.
- Criterion Games (UK) – Known for their destruction physics in Burnout and Need for Speed.
- Ubisoft Toronto (Canada) – Specializes in motion capture and physics-based gameplay.
How This Helps: A realistic boxing game needs accurate physics, fluid movement, and punch impact variations, and these studios have deep experience in that.

2. Combat Sports AI & Behavior

Japan & France

Why? Japan and France have long-standing experience in creating AI-driven sports and combat systems.
Notable Contributions:
- SEGA AM2 (Japan) – Created the Virtua Fighter series, known for its realistic fighting AI and physics.
- EKO Software (France) – Developed UFC Throwdown, one of the earliest realistic MMA games with AI-driven combat behavior.
How This Helps: Japan and France could provide AI developers who specialize in opponent tendencies, defensive mechanics, and strategic AI-based decision-making for realistic boxing gameplay.

3. Motion Capture & Fighter Animation

United States (California & New York) & Sweden

Why? The US and Sweden have world-class motion capture studios that work with top-tier fighters and athletes.
Notable Studios & Expertise:
- EA Sports (Vancouver, Canada & Orlando, USA) – EA’s FIFA and UFC games have some of the best mocap in sports.
- Rockstar San Diego (USA) – Created Red Dead Redemption 2, which features hyper-realistic character animations.
- DICE (Sweden) – Known for Battlefield’s hyper-realistic character movement and fluid animations.
How This Helps: High-quality motion capture and animation blending are crucial for realistic punch mechanics, defense movement, and knockdowns in a boxing game.

4. Realistic Boxer Models & Graphics

South Korea & Germany

Why? These countries lead in hyper-realistic character modeling and rendering.
Notable Contributions:
- South Korea (Nexon & NCSoft) – Specializes in ultra-detailed character models (e.g., Black Desert Online).
- Crytek (Germany) – Created CryEngine, one of the most visually stunning game engines (Crysis series).
How This Helps: South Korea and Germany could provide photorealistic boxer models, skin textures, lighting, and sweat simulation.

5. Realistic Sound Design (Punches, Crowds, Commentary)

United States & Australia

Why? US and Australian sound designers have experience with real-world sports commentary, crowd dynamics, and punch impact sounds.
Notable Studios & Expertise:
- Skywalker Sound (USA) – Worked on major movies and games, specializing in realistic sound effects.
- Firelight Technologies (Australia) – Developed FMOD, a leading sound engine used in games.
How This Helps: The right team from these countries could create authentic punch impact sounds, realistic breathing, and immersive arena atmosphere.

6. Realistic Fighting Strategy & Boxer Tendencies

Cuba, Mexico, United States, UK, & Ukraine

Why? These countries have a deep understanding of different boxing styles and training methods.
Boxing Influence:
- Cuba – Mastery of technical, defensive, and Olympic-style boxing.
- Mexico – Aggressive, body-punching, come-forward styles.
- United States – Balanced styles across all weight classes.
- UK – Strong heavyweight and technical fighters.
- Ukraine – Advanced footwork (e.g., Lomachenko, Usyk).
How This Helps: Hiring real boxing trainers, cutmen, and analysts from these regions would ensure authentic boxer tendencies and training mechanics.

7. Online Multiplayer & Netcode

South Korea & United States

Why? South Korea leads in online multiplayer stability, and the US has major online gaming infrastructure.
Notable Contributions:
- South Korea (Bluehole, Nexon, NCSoft) – Experts in high-speed, low-lag online gaming.
- United States (Activision, Riot Games, Epic Games) – Specializes in large-scale online netcode.
How This Helps: A great online multiplayer experience requires low-latency netcode and smooth matchmaking.

Conclusion

To create the most realistic boxing video game, a company should pull talent from:

UK & Canada – Simulation physics, gameplay mechanics.
Japan & France – AI behavior, combat strategy.
United States & Sweden – Motion capture, realistic animations.
South Korea & Germany – Visual fidelity, character rendering.
United States & Australia – Sound design and arena atmosphere.
Cuba, Mexico, UK, Ukraine, USA – Boxing strategy, real-life tendencies.
South Korea & USA – Multiplayer netcode for online play.

By combining these global talents, a true-to-life boxing simulation could be achieved, setting a new standard for realism in boxing video games.

Global Dream Team: The Best Hires to Create the Most Realistic Boxing Video Game

1. Game Development & Simulation Physics

United Kingdom (UK) & Canada

Why? The UK and Canada have some of the best simulation-based game development studios.
Notable Studios & Talent Pools:
- Codemasters (UK) – Experts in physics-based racing games like F1 and Dirt, which require high-level physics accuracy.
- Criterion Games (UK) – Known for their destruction physics in Burnout and Need for Speed.
- Ubisoft Toronto (Canada) – Specializes in motion capture and physics-based gameplay.
How This Helps: A realistic boxing game needs accurate physics, fluid movement, and punch impact variations, and these studios have deep experience in that.

2. Combat Sports AI & Behavior

Japan & France

Why? Japan and France have long-standing experience in creating AI-driven sports and combat systems.
Notable Contributions:
- SEGA AM2 (Japan) – Created the Virtua Fighter series, known for its realistic fighting AI and physics.
- EKO Software (France) – Developed UFC Throwdown, one of the earliest realistic MMA games with AI-driven combat behavior.
How This Helps: Japan and France could provide AI developers who specialize in opponent tendencies, defensive mechanics, and strategic AI-based decision-making for realistic boxing gameplay.

3. Motion Capture & Fighter Animation

United States (California & New York) & Sweden

Why? The US and Sweden have world-class motion capture studios that work with top-tier fighters and athletes.
Notable Studios & Expertise:
- EA Sports (Vancouver, Canada & Orlando, USA) – EA’s FIFA and UFC games have some of the best mocap in sports.
- Rockstar San Diego (USA) – Created Red Dead Redemption 2, which features hyper-realistic character animations.
- DICE (Sweden) – Known for Battlefield’s hyper-realistic character movement and fluid animations.
How This Helps: High-quality motion capture and animation blending are crucial for realistic punch mechanics, defense movement, and knockdowns in a boxing game.

4. Realistic Boxer Models & Graphics

South Korea & Germany

Why? These countries lead in hyper-realistic character modeling and rendering.
Notable Contributions:
- South Korea (Nexon & NCSoft) – Specializes in ultra-detailed character models (e.g., Black Desert Online).
- Crytek (Germany) – Created CryEngine, one of the most visually stunning game engines (Crysis series).
How This Helps: South Korea and Germany could provide photorealistic boxer models, skin textures, lighting, and sweat simulation.

5. Realistic Sound Design (Punches, Crowds, Commentary)

United States & Australia

Why? US and Australian sound designers have experience with real-world sports commentary, crowd dynamics, and punch impact sounds.
Notable Studios & Expertise:
- Skywalker Sound (USA) – Worked on major movies and games, specializing in realistic sound effects.
- Firelight Technologies (Australia) – Developed FMOD, a leading sound engine used in games.
How This Helps: The right team from these countries could create authentic punch impact sounds, realistic breathing, and immersive arena atmosphere.

6. Realistic Fighting Strategy & Boxer Tendencies

Cuba, Mexico, United States, UK, & Ukraine

Why? These countries have a deep understanding of different boxing styles and training methods.
Boxing Influence:
- Cuba – Mastery of technical, defensive, and Olympic-style boxing.
- Mexico – Aggressive, body-punching, come-forward styles.
- United States – Balanced styles across all weight classes.
- UK – Strong heavyweight and technical fighters.
- Ukraine – Advanced footwork (e.g., Lomachenko, Usyk).
How This Helps: Hiring real boxing trainers, cutmen, and analysts from these regions would ensure authentic boxer tendencies and training mechanics.

7. Online Multiplayer & Netcode

South Korea & United States

Why? South Korea leads in online multiplayer stability, and the US has major online gaming infrastructure.
Notable Contributions:
- South Korea (Bluehole, Nexon, NCSoft) – Experts in high-speed, low-lag online gaming.
- United States (Activision, Riot Games, Epic Games) – Specializes in large-scale online netcode.
How This Helps: A great online multiplayer experience requires low-latency netcode and smooth matchmaking.

Conclusion

To create the most realistic boxing video game, a company should pull talent from:

UK & Canada – Simulation physics, gameplay mechanics.
Japan & France – AI behavior, combat strategy.
United States & Sweden – Motion capture, realistic animations.
South Korea & Germany – Visual fidelity, character rendering.
United States & Australia – Sound design and arena atmosphere.
Cuba, Mexico, UK, Ukraine, USA – Boxing strategy, real-life tendencies.
South Korea & USA – Multiplayer netcode for online play.

By combining these global talents, a true-to-life boxing simulation could be achieved, setting a new standard for realism in boxing video games.

Deep Dive: Which Region Would Make the Best Overall Boxing Video Game? (USA vs. England vs. Japan/Asia)

Creating the best realistic boxing video game requires expertise in sports simulation, animation technology, AI behavior, game physics, content depth, and career mode immersion. Each region—USA, England, and Japan/Asia—has strengths and weaknesses that impact their ability to develop the best possible boxing game.

Key Factors for a Realistic Boxing Video Game

Boxing Knowledge & Passion – Does the region have a deep understanding of boxing's technical aspects?
Realistic Gameplay Mechanics – Can the region deliver true-to-life movement, punches, and ring physics?
AI and Boxer Tendencies – Can the region create an AI system where real boxers fight like themselves?
Career Mode & Single-Player Depth – Will the career mode be immersive, with rankings, gyms, promoters, and deep progression?
Online & Competitive Scene – Does the region understand multiplayer balance and ranked matchmaking?
Budget & Licensing Power – Can the region afford real boxers, historic legends, belts, and top-tier production?
Longevity & Mod Support – Will the game have updates, modding support, and replay value?
Monetization Approach – Will the region focus on pure gameplay or microtransactions & casual appeal?

Now, let’s analyze which region would create the best boxing video game.

1. USA – The Blockbuster Approach (Big Budget, But Casual-Focused)

Pros

🏆 The Best Sports Game Developers Are in the U.S.

The USA is home to EA Sports, 2K Sports, and Visual Concepts, studios with decades of experience in sports game development.
EA made the Fight Night series, one of the most technically impressive boxing franchises. While flawed, it was the last major physics-based boxing game.
2K revolutionized career modes with NBA 2K and could bring that depth into a boxing game.

🎥 Top-Tier Presentation, Commentary & Broadcast-Style Graphics

The USA understands how to make sports games look and feel like real broadcasts.
NBA 2K and Madden have some of the best commentary and presentation packages in sports gaming.
A U.S.-made boxing game would likely have high production value, dynamic intros, and realistic broadcast overlays.

💰 Biggest Budget & Marketing Power

American companies have deep pockets for licensing boxers, arenas, and historic fight moments.
They can afford Hollywood-level motion capture, photorealistic graphics, and next-gen physics engines.

🤖 AI & Boxing Tendencies Are Possible With a Good Team

If a dedicated team works on it, AI could be deep, with real boxers fighting like themselves.
A U.S. company could use machine learning and AI-driven tendencies to replicate real boxing styles.

Cons

🎮 Prioritizes Mass Market Appeal Over Hardcore Realism

U.S. studios have a history of making sports games arcadey for casual players.
EA’s UFC series started as a sim, but later became a casual slugfest with unrealistic mechanics.
EA and 2K could make a great-looking boxing game but ruin the depth by simplifying mechanics.

🤑 Heavy Microtransactions & Pay-to-Win Mechanics

Expect loot boxes, Ultimate Team, and aggressive DLC if EA or 2K makes it.
They would likely lock key fighters, historic fights, and customization options behind paywalls.

❌ Limited Offline Depth

If EA or 2K makes it, expect a shallow career mode focused on cutscenes instead of an open-ended experience.
They could neglect offline single-player fans, which is crucial for a boxing game.

2. England – Passion for Boxing, But Lacks AAA Experience

Pros

🥊 Deep Passion for Boxing Culture & Legacy

The UK has a long history with boxing and understands the sport’s technical aspects better than U.S. developers.
If a British company made a boxing game, it would likely focus on realism, weight classes, and ring tactics.
British developers respect the sport’s history, so they would properly implement past legends and classic fights.

🏆 Would Focus on True Simulation Gameplay

Unlike the U.S., which leans arcade, UK developers would prioritize sim mechanics.
The initial Undisputed (formerly ESBC) had good ideas about footwork, defensive styles, and fighter tendencies before shifting focus.
A UK studio would make a game where positioning, angles, and movement actually matter.

🎮 Career Mode & Single-Player Depth Would Be Strong

UK developers would likely create a deep career mode with multiple paths, including amateur, Olympic, and pro routes.
Expect detailed ranking systems, promoter negotiations, and financial management.

Cons

❌ Lack of AAA-Level Development Experience

The UK doesn’t have a strong track record in developing AAA sports simulation games.
Undisputed struggled because the developers lacked experience balancing mechanics and AI.

💰 Lower Budget & Licensing Struggles

UK developers wouldn’t have the money to license top boxers and secure major promotions.
This could lead to roster limitations and generic fighters filling divisions.

🌐 Online Play & AI Behavior Could Be Weak

UK developers haven’t mastered server stability for multiplayer games.
AI might be underdeveloped, leading to repetitive or unnatural boxing strategies.

3. Japan/Asia – The Technical Innovators (Best Mechanics & Realism)

Pros

🔬 Best Motion Capture & Animation Technology

Japan has elite motion capture and animation studios, meaning a Japanese boxing game would have smooth, fluid movement.
Developers like Konami, FromSoftware, and Sega excel in realistic physics and AI-driven combat.

🤖 Advanced AI & Boxer Tendencies

Japanese studios specialize in hardcore AI behavior (e.g., Gran Turismo, Dark Souls).
A Japanese boxing game would have AI that adapts and mimics real-world boxing styles.

🎮 Wouldn’t Dumb Down Mechanics for Casual Players

Unlike the U.S., which prioritizes accessibility, Japan embraces deep mechanics.
A Japanese game would likely feature stamina-based gameplay, realistic footwork, and intricate punch mechanics.

🔄 Commitment to Long-Term Gameplay Depth

Japan tends to make games with long replay value, deep customization, and detailed physics systems.

Cons

🌎 Might Struggle With International Appeal

A Japanese-developed boxing game might focus too much on Japanese boxers, limiting its global audience.
They might neglect Western boxing legends and major promotions.

🌐 Weak Online Infrastructure

Japan’s focus is single-player depth, so multiplayer could be an afterthought.

🎤 Weak Licensing & Commentary

Japan might not invest in top-tier commentary and real-world boxing licensing.

Final Verdict: Who Would Make the Best Boxing Game?

1️⃣ If you want the best simulation, mechanics, and realism: JAPAN 🇯🇵
2️⃣ If you want the deepest career mode & single-player experience: ENGLAND 🇬🇧
3️⃣ If you want the biggest production, online play, and marketing: USA 🇺🇸

Best Case Scenario?

Japan handles gameplay mechanics.
England handles career mode & ranking systems.
USA provides budget, motion capture, and licensing.

If one region had to make it? Japan wins for realism, England wins for depth, USA wins for sales—but none of them alone would be perfect.

continue

The Ultimate Boxing Video Game: Combining Strengths From All Three Regions

Since no single country can make a perfect boxing video game alone, the best solution is to combine the strengths of the USA, England, and Japan/Asia. Here’s how each region could contribute to the ultimate realistic boxing video game.

🏆 The Ideal Boxing Game Development Breakdown

🇯🇵 Japan/Asia – Handling Gameplay Mechanics & AI

Japanese developers would be responsible for:

Boxer Movement & Footwork Realism – Japan excels at precise movement mechanics (Gran Turismo, Dark Souls dodging system, Fight Night Round 3’s impact punches).
Realistic Stamina & Damage System – Stamina and fatigue should be deep, forcing boxers to pace themselves, like in real fights.
Adaptive AI & Boxer Tendencies – AI should reflect real-world boxing strategies, making boxers fight like themselves.
Punch & Defense Variety – Japan would ensure multiple punch animations, arcs, and trajectories, as well as realistic blocking styles.

Why Japan?
Japanese developers excel at hardcore mechanics, AI realism, and deep physics-based combat systems.

🇬🇧 England – Handling Career Mode, Gyms, and Ranking Systems

British developers would focus on:

Deep Career Mode – A long, structured career mode, including amateur, Olympic, and professional paths.
Realistic Progression System – No forced narratives—boxers should rise through rankings based on performance.
Promoters, Negotiations, and Contracts – Fighters should be able to switch promoters, manage contracts, and choose riskier or safer fights.
Training Camps & Realistic Gym Management – Boxing gyms should be a major factor, allowing players to choose trainers with different specialties.

Why England?
British developers respect boxing history and would take career mode seriously, unlike EA, which would make it gimmicky.

🇺🇸 USA – Handling Licensing, Commentary, Online Multiplayer, and Presentation

American developers would contribute:

Realistic Broadcast Presentation – Similar to NBA 2K and Madden, complete with pre-fight breakdowns, between-round analysis, and highlights.
Dynamic Commentary System – A deep commentary team with live fight analysis, similar to UFC 3’s Joe Rogan breakdowns.
Licensing & Boxer Roster – The U.S. has the money to secure top boxing legends, real promotions, and multiple belt organizations (WBC, WBA, IBF, WBO).
Online Play & Esports Infrastructure – USA-based companies know how to build matchmaking systems, leaderboards, and online ranked modes.

Why USA?
American companies have the biggest budgets for marketing, licensing, and online infrastructure.

🔗 How These Parts Fit Together

1️⃣ Core Gameplay (Japan)

Uses real-world physics, with detailed footwork, punch reactions, and AI-driven fighting tendencies.
Features realistic stamina, recovery, and fatigue management.
AI boxers fight uniquely—counterpunchers behave differently than brawlers.

2️⃣ Career Mode & Offline Depth (England)

Includes ranking systems, promoters, and financial management.
Adds realistic training camps, gym partnerships, and sparring mechanics.
Fighters start as amateurs and can move up weight classes, unify belts, and decline with age.

3️⃣ Presentation & Online Play (USA)

Features TV-style graphics, licensed arenas, and realistic broadcast overlays.
Real-life belts & promotions (WBC, IBF, WBO, WBA, The Ring, Lineal, Undisputed).
A balanced online competitive mode with dedicated servers.

🚀 Advanced Features That Would Set This Game Apart

If the game took the best from each region, it could introduce next-level innovations for a realistic boxing simulation.

💡 1. Advanced Movement System

✅ Weight Shifting & Momentum:

Some boxers have heavier footwork (Canelo), while others glide (Ali, Lomachenko).
Shifting weight before throwing a punch affects speed and power.

✅ Proper Inside & Outside Fighting Mechanics:

In-fighters like Chavez or Duran should cut off the ring naturally.
Outside fighters like Mayweather and Usyk should use lateral movement properly.

✅ Clinch System with Realistic Breaks & Tactics:

Clinching should be a strategic option (like Tyson Fury smothering opponents).
Referees should intervene based on tendencies (some let fighters work, others break early).

💡 2. Realistic Punch System

✅ Dozens of Unique Punch Variations

No single "jab" animation—fighters should throw different jabs based on style (pawing, snapping, pushing jabs).
Looping overhands, compact hooks, short vs. long uppercuts, and shovel hooks should exist.

✅ Punch Impact & Deflection System

Punches should land differently based on angles, distance, and accuracy.
A missed punch should cause balance loss or overcommitment.

✅ Counterpunching Should Be Risk/Reward

Counters shouldn’t be automatic—timing and foot positioning should determine success.
Perfectly-timed counters should cause major reactions, but spamming should be punished.

💡 3. Best AI & Boxer Tendencies Ever Created

✅ Boxers Should Fight Like Their Real-Life Counterparts

Canelo should be a pressure fighter who makes small defensive movements.
Mayweather should use the shoulder roll and counter at specific windows.
Tyson should weave inside, cut angles, and throw explosive hooks.

✅ Fighters Should Change Styles Based on Damage & Stamina

A pressure fighter should become more desperate when losing.
A speed-based fighter should slow down as fatigue sets in.

✅ Adaptive AI That Adjusts Mid-Fight

If a player keeps spamming jabs, AI should adjust by parrying more or countering over the top.
If a boxer is hurt, their trainer should advise clinching or staying on the outside.

💡 4. Broadcast-Style Career Mode

✅ Dynamic Fight Commentary & Analysis

Analysts should react to recent fights, rivalries, and upsets.
Commentators should have pre-fight predictions, mid-fight adjustments, and post-fight analysis.

✅ Fighter Careers Should Have Highs & Lows

Fighters should have peak years, injuries, and natural declines.
If a boxer suffers a bad KO, their durability should be affected long-term.
Retirement & Comeback Options – Some boxers should decline early (Fernando Vargas), while others should age gracefully (Bernard Hopkins).

🎯 Final Decision: Who Would Make the Best Boxing Game?

Category	Best Region
Realistic Gameplay & AI	🇯🇵 Japan
Career Mode & Offline Depth	🇬🇧 England
Online Play & Marketing	🇺🇸 USA
Licensing & Presentation	🇺🇸 USA
Motion Capture & Animations	🇯🇵 Japan

🏆 Overall Winner: A Combination of Japan (Gameplay), England (Career Mode), and the USA (Budget & Licensing).

Japan would handle physics, movement, and AI, making sure the game plays like real boxing.
England would handle career mode, depth, and training, making the game immersive.
The USA would provide the budget, marketing, and licensing to ensure a large roster and online stability.

Since no one region can create the perfect boxing game alone, a collaboration would be the ultimate solution. If a company combined these strengths, it would be the greatest boxing simulation ever made.

Deep Dive: Which Region Would Make the Best Overall Boxing Video Game? (USA vs. England vs. Japan/Asia)

Key Factors for a Realistic Boxing Video Game

Boxing Knowledge & Passion – Does the region have a deep understanding of boxing's technical aspects?
Realistic Gameplay Mechanics – Can the region deliver true-to-life movement, punches, and ring physics?
AI and Boxer Tendencies – Can the region create an AI system where real boxers fight like themselves?
Career Mode & Single-Player Depth – Will the career mode be immersive, with rankings, gyms, promoters, and deep progression?
Online & Competitive Scene – Does the region understand multiplayer balance and ranked matchmaking?
Budget & Licensing Power – Can the region afford real boxers, historic legends, belts, and top-tier production?
Longevity & Mod Support – Will the game have updates, modding support, and replay value?
Monetization Approach – Will the region focus on pure gameplay or microtransactions & casual appeal?

Now, let’s analyze which region would create the best boxing video game.

1. USA – The Blockbuster Approach (Big Budget, But Casual-Focused)

Pros

🏆 The Best Sports Game Developers Are in the U.S.

The USA is home to EA Sports, 2K Sports, and Visual Concepts, studios with decades of experience in sports game development.
EA made the Fight Night series, one of the most technically impressive boxing franchises. While flawed, it was the last major physics-based boxing game.
2K revolutionized career modes with NBA 2K and could bring that depth into a boxing game.

🎥 Top-Tier Presentation, Commentary & Broadcast-Style Graphics

The USA understands how to make sports games look and feel like real broadcasts.
NBA 2K and Madden have some of the best commentary and presentation packages in sports gaming.
A U.S.-made boxing game would likely have high production value, dynamic intros, and realistic broadcast overlays.

💰 Biggest Budget & Marketing Power

American companies have deep pockets for licensing boxers, arenas, and historic fight moments.
They can afford Hollywood-level motion capture, photorealistic graphics, and next-gen physics engines.

🤖 AI & Boxing Tendencies Are Possible With a Good Team

If a dedicated team works on it, AI could be deep, with real boxers fighting like themselves.
A U.S. company could use machine learning and AI-driven tendencies to replicate real boxing styles.

Cons

🎮 Prioritizes Mass Market Appeal Over Hardcore Realism

U.S. studios have a history of making sports games arcadey for casual players.
EA’s UFC series started as a sim, but later became a casual slugfest with unrealistic mechanics.
EA and 2K could make a great-looking boxing game but ruin the depth by simplifying mechanics.

🤑 Heavy Microtransactions & Pay-to-Win Mechanics

Expect loot boxes, Ultimate Team, and aggressive DLC if EA or 2K makes it.
They would likely lock key fighters, historic fights, and customization options behind paywalls.

❌ Limited Offline Depth

If EA or 2K makes it, expect a shallow career mode focused on cutscenes instead of an open-ended experience.
They could neglect offline single-player fans, which is crucial for a boxing game.

2. England – Passion for Boxing, But Lacks AAA Experience

Pros

🥊 Deep Passion for Boxing Culture & Legacy

The UK has a long history with boxing and understands the sport’s technical aspects better than U.S. developers.
If a British company made a boxing game, it would likely focus on realism, weight classes, and ring tactics.
British developers respect the sport’s history, so they would properly implement past legends and classic fights.

🏆 Would Focus on True Simulation Gameplay

Unlike the U.S., which leans arcade, UK developers would prioritize sim mechanics.
The initial Undisputed (formerly ESBC) had good ideas about footwork, defensive styles, and fighter tendencies before shifting focus.
A UK studio would make a game where positioning, angles, and movement actually matter.

🎮 Career Mode & Single-Player Depth Would Be Strong

UK developers would likely create a deep career mode with multiple paths, including amateur, Olympic, and pro routes.
Expect detailed ranking systems, promoter negotiations, and financial management.

Cons

❌ Lack of AAA-Level Development Experience

The UK doesn’t have a strong track record in developing AAA sports simulation games.
Undisputed struggled because the developers lacked experience balancing mechanics and AI.

💰 Lower Budget & Licensing Struggles

UK developers wouldn’t have the money to license top boxers and secure major promotions.
This could lead to roster limitations and generic fighters filling divisions.

🌐 Online Play & AI Behavior Could Be Weak

UK developers haven’t mastered server stability for multiplayer games.
AI might be underdeveloped, leading to repetitive or unnatural boxing strategies.

3. Japan/Asia – The Technical Innovators (Best Mechanics & Realism)

Pros

🔬 Best Motion Capture & Animation Technology

Japan has elite motion capture and animation studios, meaning a Japanese boxing game would have smooth, fluid movement.
Developers like Konami, FromSoftware, and Sega excel in realistic physics and AI-driven combat.

🤖 Advanced AI & Boxer Tendencies

Japanese studios specialize in hardcore AI behavior (e.g., Gran Turismo, Dark Souls).
A Japanese boxing game would have AI that adapts and mimics real-world boxing styles.

🎮 Wouldn’t Dumb Down Mechanics for Casual Players

Unlike the U.S., which prioritizes accessibility, Japan embraces deep mechanics.
A Japanese game would likely feature stamina-based gameplay, realistic footwork, and intricate punch mechanics.

🔄 Commitment to Long-Term Gameplay Depth

Japan tends to make games with long replay value, deep customization, and detailed physics systems.

Cons

🌎 Might Struggle With International Appeal

A Japanese-developed boxing game might focus too much on Japanese boxers, limiting its global audience.
They might neglect Western boxing legends and major promotions.

🌐 Weak Online Infrastructure

Japan’s focus is single-player depth, so multiplayer could be an afterthought.

🎤 Weak Licensing & Commentary

Japan might not invest in top-tier commentary and real-world boxing licensing.

Final Verdict: Who Would Make the Best Boxing Game?

Best Case Scenario?

Japan handles gameplay mechanics.
England handles career mode & ranking systems.
USA provides budget, motion capture, and licensing.

If one region had to make it? Japan wins for realism, England wins for depth, USA wins for sales—but none of them alone would be perfect.

continue

The Ultimate Boxing Video Game: Combining Strengths From All Three Regions

🏆 The Ideal Boxing Game Development Breakdown

🇯🇵 Japan/Asia – Handling Gameplay Mechanics & AI

Japanese developers would be responsible for:

Boxer Movement & Footwork Realism – Japan excels at precise movement mechanics (Gran Turismo, Dark Souls dodging system, Fight Night Round 3’s impact punches).
Realistic Stamina & Damage System – Stamina and fatigue should be deep, forcing boxers to pace themselves, like in real fights.
Adaptive AI & Boxer Tendencies – AI should reflect real-world boxing strategies, making boxers fight like themselves.
Punch & Defense Variety – Japan would ensure multiple punch animations, arcs, and trajectories, as well as realistic blocking styles.

Why Japan?
Japanese developers excel at hardcore mechanics, AI realism, and deep physics-based combat systems.

🇬🇧 England – Handling Career Mode, Gyms, and Ranking Systems

British developers would focus on:

Deep Career Mode – A long, structured career mode, including amateur, Olympic, and professional paths.
Realistic Progression System – No forced narratives—boxers should rise through rankings based on performance.
Promoters, Negotiations, and Contracts – Fighters should be able to switch promoters, manage contracts, and choose riskier or safer fights.
Training Camps & Realistic Gym Management – Boxing gyms should be a major factor, allowing players to choose trainers with different specialties.

Why England?
British developers respect boxing history and would take career mode seriously, unlike EA, which would make it gimmicky.

🇺🇸 USA – Handling Licensing, Commentary, Online Multiplayer, and Presentation

American developers would contribute:

Realistic Broadcast Presentation – Similar to NBA 2K and Madden, complete with pre-fight breakdowns, between-round analysis, and highlights.
Dynamic Commentary System – A deep commentary team with live fight analysis, similar to UFC 3’s Joe Rogan breakdowns.
Licensing & Boxer Roster – The U.S. has the money to secure top boxing legends, real promotions, and multiple belt organizations (WBC, WBA, IBF, WBO).
Online Play & Esports Infrastructure – USA-based companies know how to build matchmaking systems, leaderboards, and online ranked modes.

Why USA?
American companies have the biggest budgets for marketing, licensing, and online infrastructure.

🔗 How These Parts Fit Together

1️⃣ Core Gameplay (Japan)

Uses real-world physics, with detailed footwork, punch reactions, and AI-driven fighting tendencies.
Features realistic stamina, recovery, and fatigue management.
AI boxers fight uniquely—counterpunchers behave differently than brawlers.

2️⃣ Career Mode & Offline Depth (England)

Includes ranking systems, promoters, and financial management.
Adds realistic training camps, gym partnerships, and sparring mechanics.
Fighters start as amateurs and can move up weight classes, unify belts, and decline with age.

3️⃣ Presentation & Online Play (USA)

Features TV-style graphics, licensed arenas, and realistic broadcast overlays.
Real-life belts & promotions (WBC, IBF, WBO, WBA, The Ring, Lineal, Undisputed).
A balanced online competitive mode with dedicated servers.

🚀 Advanced Features That Would Set This Game Apart

If the game took the best from each region, it could introduce next-level innovations for a realistic boxing simulation.

💡 1. Advanced Movement System

✅ Weight Shifting & Momentum:

Some boxers have heavier footwork (Canelo), while others glide (Ali, Lomachenko).
Shifting weight before throwing a punch affects speed and power.

✅ Proper Inside & Outside Fighting Mechanics:

In-fighters like Chavez or Duran should cut off the ring naturally.
Outside fighters like Mayweather and Usyk should use lateral movement properly.

✅ Clinch System with Realistic Breaks & Tactics:

Clinching should be a strategic option (like Tyson Fury smothering opponents).
Referees should intervene based on tendencies (some let fighters work, others break early).

💡 2. Realistic Punch System

✅ Dozens of Unique Punch Variations

No single "jab" animation—fighters should throw different jabs based on style (pawing, snapping, pushing jabs).
Looping overhands, compact hooks, short vs. long uppercuts, and shovel hooks should exist.

✅ Punch Impact & Deflection System

Punches should land differently based on angles, distance, and accuracy.
A missed punch should cause balance loss or overcommitment.

✅ Counterpunching Should Be Risk/Reward

Counters shouldn’t be automatic—timing and foot positioning should determine success.
Perfectly-timed counters should cause major reactions, but spamming should be punished.

💡 3. Best AI & Boxer Tendencies Ever Created

✅ Boxers Should Fight Like Their Real-Life Counterparts

Canelo should be a pressure fighter who makes small defensive movements.
Mayweather should use the shoulder roll and counter at specific windows.
Tyson should weave inside, cut angles, and throw explosive hooks.

✅ Fighters Should Change Styles Based on Damage & Stamina

A pressure fighter should become more desperate when losing.
A speed-based fighter should slow down as fatigue sets in.

✅ Adaptive AI That Adjusts Mid-Fight

If a player keeps spamming jabs, AI should adjust by parrying more or countering over the top.
If a boxer is hurt, their trainer should advise clinching or staying on the outside.

💡 4. Broadcast-Style Career Mode

✅ Dynamic Fight Commentary & Analysis

Analysts should react to recent fights, rivalries, and upsets.
Commentators should have pre-fight predictions, mid-fight adjustments, and post-fight analysis.

✅ Fighter Careers Should Have Highs & Lows

Fighters should have peak years, injuries, and natural declines.
If a boxer suffers a bad KO, their durability should be affected long-term.
Retirement & Comeback Options – Some boxers should decline early (Fernando Vargas), while others should age gracefully (Bernard Hopkins).

🎯 Final Decision: Who Would Make the Best Boxing Game?

Category	Best Region
Realistic Gameplay & AI	🇯🇵 Japan
Career Mode & Offline Depth	🇬🇧 England
Online Play & Marketing	🇺🇸 USA
Licensing & Presentation	🇺🇸 USA
Motion Capture & Animations	🇯🇵 Japan

🏆 Overall Winner: A Combination of Japan (Gameplay), England (Career Mode), and the USA (Budget & Licensing).

Japan would handle physics, movement, and AI, making sure the game plays like real boxing.
England would handle career mode, depth, and training, making the game immersive.
The USA would provide the budget, marketing, and licensing to ensure a large roster and online stability.

The Hard Questions SCI & Ash Habib Must Answer: Is Undisputed Still a True Boxing Sim or Just Empty Promises?

It seems like many fans of Undisputed—especially those who were excited about the early ESBC version—are growing frustrated with the way SCI and Ash Habib are handling communication, changes in direction, and the lack of transparency. If we cut through all the PR talk, deflections, and excuses, the real questions fans want answered are:

1. Why did the gameplay change so drastically from the ESBC version?

The ESBC version had momentum, foot planting, and better physics. Many believe Undisputed moved toward an arcadey feel rather than refining what made ESBC great.
Why were mechanics like realistic footwork, punches having weight, and natural movement altered?

2. Who is actually making the gameplay decisions?

Is it Ash Habib, the dev team, or external influences (investors, casual gaming consultants, esports push, etc.)?
Did external parties push SCI to make the game more casual instead of realistic?

3. Why does Ash Habib constantly promise one thing and deliver another?

He’s said they’re making the most realistic boxing game, but the gameplay doesn’t align with that statement.
Is SCI intentionally misleading fans with selective wording, or is there a disconnect between vision and execution?

4. What happened to foot planting and realistic movement?

Boxers now slide around, and loose footwork is universally accessible, which isn't realistic.
Why did they remove the grounded, momentum-based movement system that was in early ESBC?

5. Why does every update feel like it takes one step forward and two steps back?

Fans have noticed that each update either breaks something else or nerfs realistic aspects.
Why does SCI keep overhauling mechanics instead of refining them?

**6. Why is Undisputed so restrictive compared to past boxing games?**

Why can’t players adjust realism settings or create more boxers?
Why is offline gameplay so limited when it should allow full control?

7. Are they truly listening to the right feedback?

They claim they listen to feedback, but many fans feel like they’re ignoring sim-focused players and hardcore boxing fans.
Are they prioritizing feedback from casual players and influencers over actual boxing enthusiasts?

8. Why is clinching, inside fighting, and bodywork still not properly implemented?

Inside fighting is still weak, and clinching (a major part of real boxing) is barely present.
Why do they avoid discussing true inside-fighting mechanics?

9. Why do punch animations still look robotic and lack fluidity?

Many animations look forced, stiff, and lack proper weight transfer.
Why haven’t they focused on adding more punch variety, angles, and natural mechanics?

10. Is Ash Habib deflecting or shifting blame?

Some fans believe he is now avoiding accountability by making vague statements.
Instead of answering direct questions, why does he keep talking about “improving over time” without real specifics?

11. Are they even capable of making the game they originally promised?

Does SCI have the resources and expertise to execute a true sim boxing game, or have they been in over their heads?
If not, will they admit it instead of leading fans on with false hope?

Has Ash Habib Started Deflecting?

Yes, it seems like he is. When asked about major concerns, his responses often follow a pattern:

Vague Promises – “We’re working on improvements.”
Deflection to Future Updates – “We have big plans coming soon.”
Reframing Criticism – “It’s a process, and we’re listening to feedback.”
Shifting Blame – “Game development takes time, and we can’t please everyone.”

This is a classic deflection strategy. Instead of directly answering why certain features were changed or removed, he pushes the focus onto future updates, making fans wait while avoiding real accountability.

The Core of the Issue: Is SCI Still Making a Realistic Boxing Game?

One of the biggest problems fans have is that Undisputed started as a realistic boxing simulation and has since shifted toward a hybrid arcade approach.

Early ESBC had better foot planting, realistic weight behind punches, and momentum-based movement.
Now, footwork is floaty, boxers slide around, and mechanics feel more “gamey” than realistic.
Defensive movement is too universal instead of being tied to styles or skill levels.
Punching doesn’t have enough variety in angles, weight transfer, or natural reactions.

Ash Habib keeps saying Undisputed is aiming for realism, yet the gameplay updates contradict this. The disconnect between words and actions is why many fans feel misled.

The Unanswered Questions That Can’t Be Ignored

1. Why Did SCI Water Down the Simulation Elements?

Did they realize that true realism is too hard to develop?
Did investors push for a more casual game?
Did they scrap the original plan but don’t want to admit it?

2. Why Are They So Afraid of Transparency?

If they still believe in the original vision, why not show a roadmap?
Why not directly address concerns instead of generic PR answers?

3. Did SCI Ever Have a Real Plan for Career Mode & Offline Depth?

Career mode details have been vague.
Offline modes are extremely limited (no sliders, no deep customization).
Are they intentionally stalling career mode to avoid backlash if it’s shallow?

4. Why Are Animations & Physics Still Unpolished After So Many Updates?

Why do punches still look robotic?
Why does inside fighting still lack depth?
Why do some punch reactions look awkward and unnatural?

5. Will SCI Ever Let Fans Customize Their Experience?

Why can’t players tweak realism settings?
Why aren’t there more creation slots for boxers?
Why is offline play restricted instead of fully open?

Is SCI Actually Listening, or Just Pretending?

They say they listen to feedback, but the gameplay keeps moving in the wrong direction.
The most passionate boxing sim fans feel ignored.
Instead of refining a good base, they keep overhauling mechanics in ways that don’t improve realism.

If they were truly listening, they’d bring back the ESBC movement, foot planting, and more realistic punch variety. Instead, they seem focused on an esports-friendly, casual hybrid—which directly contradicts their original promise.

What’s Next?

Ash Habib and SCI need to stop dodging and start answering real questions.
They need to be honest about their direction—is Undisputed still a sim, or is it shifting toward a different audience?
If they are serious about realism, they need to fix movement, foot planting, and punch variety immediately.
Fans need to keep pressuring them to give real answers instead of accepting vague promises.

Right now, SCI seems afraid to admit that Undisputed isn’t what they originally pitched. The longer they deflect, the more fans will lose trust—and once that happens, it’s almost impossible to recover.

So the real question is: Will Ash Habib finally be honest, or will he keep running in circles?