---

Ratings Belong in Boxing Games, And Tiers Prove a Shift Toward Arcade Thinking

When Ash Habib brought up a tier system during the Content Creator event, it revealed far more than a design choice. It exposed a mindset. A direction. A willingness to drift away from authentic boxing simulation and toward an arcade framework that simplifies the sport rather than representing it.

The attempt to justify tiers by claiming ratings are “too subjective” or “too difficult” completely collapses under scrutiny. Ratings absolutely belong in a boxing videogame, and the sport already has decades of proof that they can be done accurately. The tier idea is not innovative. It is not balanced. It is a shortcut created when a developer does not build the system's real boxing requirements.

---

Why a Tier System Does Not Belong in a Boxing Videogame

A tier system replaces the complexity of the sport with:

• Simplified character brackets

• Artificial power groupings

• Fixed meta hierarchies

• Predetermined competitive outcomes

This structure makes sense in arcade fighters where characters have exaggerated abilities, magical attacks, and intentionally unrealistic move sets. It does not make sense in a sport built on measurable attributes, proven tendencies, and observable skill sets.

Boxing is not a tiered sport.
Boxers are not ranked by S-tier and B-tier characteristics.
Styles, skills, conditioning, and ring IQ determine outcomes, not arbitrary labels.

A tier system strips individuality and removes the authenticity fans are paying for.

---

If Tiers Are Proposed, It Means the Studio Lacks Real Systems

A tier system is the fallback option when a boxing game has no:

• Deep rating model

• Tendency system

• Skill-based footwork profiles

• Punch rhythm logic

• Defensive variation

• Stamina and energy pacing that differentiates boxers

• AI capable of expressing real-world styles

In other words, tiers appear when the foundation for a simulation is missing.

Rather than build real boxing logic, some developers categorize fighters into “strong,” “medium,” or “weak,” hoping players accept it as balance. But when your game is based on a real sport with decades of data, that approach is unacceptable.

---

Ratings Are Not Subjective, Experts Already Do This With High Accuracy

The claim that ratings are “too subjective” or “too hard to get right” is debunked instantly by the games and analysts who already nail it.

Leather Tactical Boxing

Accurate attributes and logic-driven outcomes based on measurable boxing behavior.

Title Bout Championship Boxing

The undisputed king of boxing analytics. Play thousands of matches and the outcomes align almost perfectly with real-world boxing expectations.

These games prove something important:
Realistic ratings and tendencies require expertise, not excuses.

The sport has plentiful sources of accurate evaluation:

• Trainers

• Historians

• Former boxers

• Analysts

• Broadcasters

• Judges

• Cutmen

These professionals can evaluate attributes like:

• Punch accuracy and technique

• Footwork quality

• Ring IQ

• Defensive responsibility

• Speed and timing

• Endurance and recovery

• Power profiles

• Punching rhythm patterns

Boxing is full of measurable traits. It is one of the easiest sports to analyze because everything is recorded, televised, archived, and broken down by experts every week.

There is no legitimate reason a AAA or AA studio cannot implement a modern rating system that reflects reality.

---

Ratings Produce Realistic Outcomes, Tiers Destroy Them

Ratings allow:

• Styles to clash naturally

• Strengths and weaknesses matter

• Real upsets based on tactical execution

• Strategic differences across divisions

• Realistic pacing and punch selection

• True boxer identity and personality

A tier system flattens all of that into a generic template.

Tiers encourage:

• Meta picks

• Predictable matchups

• Reduced individuality

• Less strategy

• More arcade pacing

• Removal of nuanced styles

This direction signals a shift away from the original ESBC vision that attracted the community, the realistic/sim boxing experience that fans were promised.

---

The Truth: Tiers Are Added When Developers Fear Complexity

A studio reaches for a tier system when it cannot:

• Fix footwork

• Balance stamina

• Differentiate styles

• Build real counter mechanics

• Tune punch timing and speed accurately

• Implement realistic defensive logic

• Maintain consistent physics systems

Tiers are a shield for incomplete mechanics.
Ratings expose weak mechanics by showing who should dominate and who should struggle.

Tiers hide.
Ratings reveal.

---

Esports Does Not Require Simplification, It Requires Depth

If Ash believes arcade structures are necessary for Esports viability, he is being misled.

The biggest competitive titles thrive because of:

• Depth

• Skill mastery

• Complexity behind the scenes

• Systems that reward intelligence and creativity

NBA2K, EA FC, UFC, and most major sports Esports titles all rely on:

• Detailed ratings

• Tendencies

• Signature behaviors

• Individual attributes

Not tiers.

Esports succeeds when the game rewards high-level understanding.
Boxing, more than almost any sport, fits that model perfectly, if developers embrace depth instead of shortcuts.

---

The Real Reason Studios Avoid Ratings: Accountability

A real rating system exposes whether the game:

• Handles footwork correctly

• Represents defense authentically

• Allows counterpunch timing to matter

• Maintains consistent stamina modeling

• Let's styles influence outcomes naturally

If the systems are weak, ratings show it.

Tiers, on the other hand, mask those weaknesses by flattening everything under artificial categories. This removes the pressure to build a complete simulation.

---

Fans Should Reject the Tier Direction Completely

The boxing community is not asking for anything extreme. They want:

• Authenticity

• Respect for the sport

• Accurate boxer representation

• Mechanics that reward real boxing strategy

Ratings deliver that.
Tiers erase it.

Leather Tactical Boxing and Title Bout Championship Boxing prove that data-driven authenticity produces believable outcomes. With today’s technology, pipelines, and analytics tools, there is no excuse.

A tier system in Undisputed is a step backward.
A rating system is the standard that every boxing game should meet.

---

Final Word

If a developer proposes tiers in a boxing game, they are either:

• Moving toward arcade gameplay,

• Avoiding the work required to build real systems, or

• Being advised by people who do not understand the sport.

The boxing community deserves a realistic/sim experience that respects the sport. The data exists. The experts exist. The blueprint exists.

There is no excuse.