Wednesday, September 24, 2025

“From Chess to Checkers: How Undisputed Abandoned Its Promise to Boxing Fans”









“From Chess to Checkers: How Undisputed Abandoned Its Promise to Boxing Fans”


A Broken Promise

When ESBC (now Undisputed) was first announced, boxing fans were told this was our game. A realistic, strategic boxing simulation—the kind of project fans had been dreaming about since EA abandoned Fight Night. Ash Habib himself once said he wanted ESBC to be like chess, not checkers—a thinking person’s fight game where strategy mattered more than button-mashing.

But somewhere along the way, the vision shifted. Today, Habib has made it clear: Undisputed is being built for casual fans. The hardcore boxing community, the very group that sustained interest in the sport’s gaming presence for decades, is being told to accept this new direction with no options, no modes, and no respect.

This isn’t balance. This isn’t compromise. This is dismissal.


The Casual Pivot: An Excuse Disguised as Balance

The word “balance” has become a shield. Every time a fan points out unrealistic gameplay or asks for authentic features, the response is: “We have to balance the game.”

But balance has been used as an excuse, not a design principle. Instead of adding depth with multiple modes—simulation, hybrid, arcade—SCI has chosen to build the game solely for casual accessibility. And let’s be honest: hybrid always leans arcadey. It becomes a diluted experience where realism is sacrificed for faster knockouts and spammable gameplay loops.

The result? A boxing game that sells itself as authentic but plays like another generic fighting title with gloves.


Why Hardcore Fans Are the Lifeblood

Casual fans may boost early sales, but hardcore fans sustain games. They are the ones who:

  • Buy every edition year after year.

  • Keep communities alive with leagues, mods, and discussions.

  • Push developers to innovate rather than stagnate.

  • Carry the knowledge, history, and authenticity of the sport into the virtual space.

Look at other sports titles:

  • NBA 2K didn’t survive two decades on casuals alone—it thrived because hardcore fans demanded realism, demanded tendencies, demanded deep creation tools.

  • EA UFC leaned heavily arcade in its first entries, but it’s the sim-leaning players who kept forums buzzing, who tested the limits, and who demanded more depth.

  • Even Fight Night Champion, often remembered fondly, only had staying power because hardcore players kept it alive long after EA abandoned boxing.

Casual players come and go. Hardcore fans are the bedrock. Without them, a sports game doesn’t have legs.


“It’s Just a Game”: The Most Dangerous Dismissal

Whenever hardcore fans protest, someone inevitably throws out the phrase: “It’s just a game.”

But boxing fans know better. This isn’t just about pixels and polygons—it’s about the representation of a sport with over a century of cultural weight. It’s about accuracy, respect, and immersion.

Would you tell an NBA 2K player that basketball realism doesn’t matter? Would you tell FIFA fans it’s fine if the rules are changed because “it’s just a game”? Of course not. So why should boxing fans be treated differently?

Please don’t come with “it’s just a game.” Boxing deserves better, and so do we.


The Stakes: More Than One Title

This isn’t just about Undisputed—it’s about the future of boxing in gaming. If SCI sets the precedent that casual-first, arcade-leaning design is the standard, every future developer will follow suit. Authenticity will be seen as a risk rather than a requirement.

The sport’s gaming legacy is already fragile. We’ve gone more than a decade without a major simulation boxing title. If this moment is wasted, the window may close for another generation.

And make no mistake: when a company takes the trust of boxing fans and then tells them their voices don’t matter, it’s not balance. It’s betrayal.


A Call to Action: Protest the Disrespect

Hardcore fans can’t stay silent. We need to act now:

  • Raise your voices. Speak on forums, social media, YouTube, and podcasts. Let SCI know the hardcore community will not be silenced.

  • Protest the disrespect. Make it clear that without an authentic simulation mode, we will not stand behind this direction.

  • Show our strength. Hardcore fans are not a “small minority.” We are the reason boxing in gaming still exists at all.


Conclusion: Hardcore Fans Matter

Boxing is the sweet science. It is strategy, patience, and timing. It deserves a videogame that reflects that, not a watered-down arcade experiment dressed up as authenticity.

Don’t let them blatantly disrespect the sport. Hybrid or not, if developers refuse to give options for simulation, it will always lean arcadey. And when that happens, it’s the loyal, hardcore fans who suffer most.

The message is simple:
Hardcore fans matter. Without us, there is no Undisputed.



No comments:

Post a Comment

“Boxing Fans Don’t Know What They Want”? The Biggest Deception in Sports Gaming

  “Boxing Fans Don’t Know What They Want”? – The Biggest Deception in Sports Gaming Introduction: A Dangerous Narrative In the world of b...