Wednesday, August 20, 2025

Hiring authority & authenticity

 

Hiring authority & authenticity

The short answer

  • Accountable (final say): Studio Head/GM and/or Executive Producer (EP) — own budget, headcount, and the quality bar.

  • Responsible (makes the hire): Department Directors/Leads (Tech, Design, Animation, Art, Audio, QA). They define roles, run loops, pick finalists.

  • Enablement: Recruiting/Talent Acquisition runs the funnel; Finance/HR/Legal handle approvals and compliance.

  • Authenticity co-owner: Director of Product Authenticity (DPA) is a required voice for realism-touching roles and holds a veto on authenticity grounds for those hires.


Accountability ladder (who signs what)

  1. Dept Lead (Hiring Manager): Problem statement → role definition → evaluation rubric.

  2. EP/Studio Head: Approves headcount/level/comp band.

  3. Recruiting: Opens req, sources, screens logistics.

  4. Interview Loop: Panel runs; HM consolidates signal.

  5. Decision: HM selects; DPA co-signs (or vetoes) realism-critical roles.

  6. Offer: EP/Studio Head signs; Recruiting delivers.

  7. Onboarding: Producer sequences; DPA owns authenticity gates for first 90 days.


RACI with the Director of Product Authenticity (merged)

Step Dept Lead (HM) EP/Studio Head Recruiting Producer/Dev Dir DPA
Headcount planning R A C C C
Job description & authenticity rubric R C C C R
Work-sample design (boxing realism) C I C C R
Sourcing & screening C I R I I
Interviews/assessments R I C I R
Final selection (realism-critical roles*) R A C I A (authenticity veto)
Final selection (non-critical) R A C I C
Offer & compensation C A R I I
Onboarding plan & authenticity gates C I I R A

*Realism-critical roles: Gameplay/AI Engineer, Combat/Systems Designer, Animation Lead/Tech Anim, Fight Tech, Camera/Presentation, Audio/Commentary Lead, QA Leadership for gameplay realism.


Where the DPA plugs into the funnel

  • Role definition: Co-authors the authenticity competencies (boxing IQ, realism heuristics, film-study literacy).

  • Rubric & work sample: Specifies tasks that reveal judgment on footwork, timing windows, clinch/ref logic, hit-zone mapping, stamina/recovery, vulnerability and judging models.

  • Interview panel: Mandatory interviewer for realism-touching roles; runs scenario and footage-annotation exercises.

  • Decision: Co-signs the hire; holds a veto if authenticity criteria aren’t met.

  • Onboarding: Owns the authenticity checklist and exit criteria for 30/60/90 days.


Boxing-specific hiring standards (applies across Design/Engineering/Animation/QA)

  • Boxing literacy: Stance, range control, defensive responsibility, ring craft, judging criteria.

  • Mechanics realism: Footwork locomotion/IK, stamina & recovery curves, vulnerability windows, referee & clinch systems, damage zones/hit reactions.

  • Evidence-based tuning: Uses telemetry + film breakdown to justify changes; distinguishes spectacle vs sport.

  • Content authenticity: Likenesses, era/style accuracy, commentary correctness, presentation/camera that reads like real broadcasts.

  • QA realism bar: QA leads must validate authenticity (not just stability).


Sample interview loop (merged)

  1. Recruiter screen (30m): Motivation, constraints, compensation.

  2. Hiring Manager deep dive (60m): Portfolio; deconstruct a complex combat/system.

  3. DPA “Sparring Review” (45–60m): Candidate annotates a real bout clip → maps to engine states (zones, timings, transitions) and defends choices.

  4. Technical exercise (90m live or take-home):

    • Eng: implement a footwork state machine with timing windows & stamina hooks.

    • Design: prototype a clinch/ref break system with vulnerability tradeoffs.

    • Animation/TechAnim: retarget punch set with contact alignment + recovery timings.

  5. Cross-discipline panel (45m): Cameras/Audio/Presentation and QA realism scenarios.

  6. Debrief & decision: HM proposes; DPA co-signs (veto power if realism fails); EP signs offer.


Practical add-ons you can adopt today

  • Authenticity Gate: No offer for realism-critical roles without DPA sign-off.

  • Advisory bench: Coaches/cutmen/historians as consulted interviewers, curated by the DPA.

  • Work-sample library: Re-usable tasks covering footwork, clinch/ref, hit-zones, judging, commentary eventing.

  • 90-day acceptance criteria:

    • 30d: Baseline film-study pack; implement 1 realism ticket end-to-end.

    • 60d: Ship a tuning change backed by telemetry + film evidence.

    • 90d: Lead a mini-feature review through the DPA checklist.

If you want, I can turn this into a one-page template (role brief, rubric, loop, work-samples, 90-day gates) you can drop into every realism-touching req.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Why Some Developers and Gamers Use the Release Date as the Only Measurement, and Why It’s Wrong

Why Some Developers and Gamers Use the Release Date as the Only Measurement, and Why It’s Wrong Most people judge a game by its release d...