Videogame Feedback

Monday, March 24, 2025

An Open Letter to Ash Habib and the Steel City Interactive Team

**Stop Wasting Time — Undisputed Deserves Better**

Posted on [3/24/2025
]
By: A Fed-Up Boxing Gamer Who’s Done Making Excuses

Let’s Get Real.

Ash,

What’s happening with Undisputed is beyond frustrating—it's disgraceful. You’ve had the time. You’ve had the resources. You’ve had the community. Yet the game continues to stumble, stall, and spiral.

From the outside, it looks like your team isn’t just behind schedule—they’re willfully acting like they can’t do what needs to be done, despite the fact that the technology and the know-how absolutely exist.

There’s no longer a sense of urgency. No leadership. And no real commitment to save this game from the hole it’s in.

This Isn’t About Limitations — It’s About Laziness or Sabotage

The excuses don’t fly anymore.

Realistic movement? It can be done.
Punch variety and responsiveness? The tech exists.
AI that fights like real boxers? Absolutely possible.
Dynamic career modes, clean presentation, deep customization? All proven, all achievable.

So why does it feel like you're choosing not to improve the game?
Why does it feel like you're deliberately stalling, stretching out development until everyone loses interest—or worse, gives up entirely?

If this isn't sabotage, then it's dangerously close to gross negligence.

The April Update Could Be the Final Straw

You've been hyping this next update like it’s a game-changer.
It better be.

Because if it’s more of the same:

Vague patch notes
Minimal gameplay progress
Ignored core issues
And a lack of communication

…then it won’t just disappoint—it’ll signal to the community that Undisputed is on life support, and the people in charge are the ones pulling the plug.

Time’s Up for Excuses. Step Up or Step Aside.

This community believed in you. We rooted for you. We’ve shared our ideas, time, feedback, and even defended you when criticism came flying in.

But what have we gotten in return?

Half-baked mechanics
Broken promises
And an unfinished game that somehow keeps regressing

Here’s the truth you need to hear:
You’re sabotaging your own potential.
You’re ignoring the people who want to help you succeed.
And you’re running out of time.

Deliver the Game You Promised—Or Watch Someone Else Do It Better

At this point, it’s not even about being first. It’s about being right.
Someone will make a better boxing game if you keep this up. The demand is there. The blueprint exists. And the patience is running dry.

We don’t want excuses.
We want execution.

So either:

✅ Lead this project with real urgency, transparency, and purpose…
OR
❌ Step aside and make room for people who actually give a damn about boxing, gaming, and keeping their word.

Your Move, Ash. Make It Count.

The April update will tell us everything.
If it’s another letdown, then Undisputed may go down not as a revolution—but as the greatest missed opportunity in sports gaming history.

We’re not here to babysit the development. We’re here to see boxing games finally get what they deserve.

Don’t waste this chance.

An Open Letter to Ash Habib and the Steel City Interactive Team

**Stop Wasting Time — Undisputed Deserves Better**

Posted on [3/24/2025
]
By: A Fed-Up Boxing Gamer Who’s Done Making Excuses

Let’s Get Real.

Ash,

There’s no longer a sense of urgency. No leadership. And no real commitment to save this game from the hole it’s in.

This Isn’t About Limitations — It’s About Laziness or Sabotage

The excuses don’t fly anymore.

Realistic movement? It can be done.
Punch variety and responsiveness? The tech exists.
AI that fights like real boxers? Absolutely possible.
Dynamic career modes, clean presentation, deep customization? All proven, all achievable.

If this isn't sabotage, then it's dangerously close to gross negligence.

The April Update Could Be the Final Straw

You've been hyping this next update like it’s a game-changer.
It better be.

Because if it’s more of the same:

Vague patch notes
Minimal gameplay progress
Ignored core issues
And a lack of communication

…then it won’t just disappoint—it’ll signal to the community that Undisputed is on life support, and the people in charge are the ones pulling the plug.

Time’s Up for Excuses. Step Up or Step Aside.

This community believed in you. We rooted for you. We’ve shared our ideas, time, feedback, and even defended you when criticism came flying in.

But what have we gotten in return?

Half-baked mechanics
Broken promises
And an unfinished game that somehow keeps regressing

Here’s the truth you need to hear:
You’re sabotaging your own potential.
You’re ignoring the people who want to help you succeed.
And you’re running out of time.

Deliver the Game You Promised—Or Watch Someone Else Do It Better

We don’t want excuses.
We want execution.

So either:

✅ Lead this project with real urgency, transparency, and purpose…
OR
❌ Step aside and make room for people who actually give a damn about boxing, gaming, and keeping their word.

Your Move, Ash. Make It Count.

The April update will tell us everything.
If it’s another letdown, then Undisputed may go down not as a revolution—but as the greatest missed opportunity in sports gaming history.

We’re not here to babysit the development. We’re here to see boxing games finally get what they deserve.

Don’t waste this chance.

Is Ash Habib’s Development Team Sabotaging “Undisputed”? A Deep Dive into Concerns Surrounding the Game’s Future

Introduction: The boxing game Undisputed, once hailed as the return of realism in a genre long-starved of serious simulation, is now spiraling into what some fans perceive as a frustrating cycle of excuses, procrastination, and mismanagement. With each passing update—or lack thereof—concerns mount that Ash Habib and his development team may be more complicit in the game's stagnation than previously assumed.

1. Technology Exists – So Why the Delay?

There is no shortage of technology or knowledge in 2025 when it comes to developing a high-quality, realistic boxing game. Motion capture, AI behavior trees, data-driven animation systems, dynamic crowd simulation, and adaptive audio commentary are not far-fetched requests. They are foundational components of many sports games released in the last decade.

Yet, Undisputed continues to struggle with basic elements: proper punch animations, fluid footwork, realistic AI tendencies, and responsive damage systems. Fans who’ve followed the sport—and gaming—closely know this is not a matter of feasibility. It’s a matter of will.

“It’s almost as if the team is pretending things can’t be done, when in reality, they’re choosing not to do them.”

2. Intentional Stalling or Misguided Priorities?

Critics have begun to ask: Is this development team intentionally dragging its feet? There seems to be a lack of urgency in fixing glaring gameplay issues, addressing community feedback, or even expanding on already-promised features like Career Mode, Ranked Championships, or the in-depth customization suite.

Worse, updates come sparsely, often with vague language and minimal change logs. Many believe the development roadmap is being rewritten mid-flight, without clear communication. If the team knows how to improve the game but chooses to delay those improvements, that leans into something more sinister: self-sabotage, or perhaps even strategic stalling.

3. The April Update: Nail in the Coffin?

The upcoming April Update has become a looming milestone—either a breakthrough or a backbreaker. After months of dwindling player counts, skeptical community posts, and questionable patches, this update carries more weight than just new features. It may determine the long-term viability of Undisputed.

If the update fails to deliver:

A serious and noticeable gameplay overhaul,
Authentic boxing tendencies for real-life fighters,
A fix to clunky or robotic movement and punch logic,
And communication that shows direction and accountability,

then many believe the game may be beyond saving in the eyes of both hardcore fans and the broader gaming community.

4. No Sense of Urgency, No Sense of Direction

The most damning perception is the absence of urgency. This isn’t just about bugs or delays—it’s about the lack of a visionary push. While the community continues to rally behind the potential of a truly realistic boxing sim, the development team appears content with mediocrity.

There’s no public plan for refining AI, improving movement systems, expanding offline features, or even fixing critical issues that have been highlighted for over a year. To fans, it feels like:

The drive to innovate is gone.
The fight to save the game is not being fought.

5. A Call for Transparency and Action

The community is not without patience—but it demands honesty and commitment. If Ash Habib and the team are overwhelmed, they need to say so. If there's a pivot in direction, communicate it. But the current strategy—silence, minimal effort updates, and the appearance of false limitations—creates an environment of distrust.

Conclusion:

Undisputed still has the bones of a great game. But its future hinges on whether the team behind it chooses to step up or continue to play ignorant while the game withers. With all the tools and tech at their disposal, the only thing holding them back seems to be themselves.

The April Update could either be the rebirth of Undisputed—or the moment boxing fans finally throw in the towel.

Is Ash Habib’s Development Team Sabotaging “Undisputed”? A Deep Dive into Concerns Surrounding the Game’s Future

1. Technology Exists – So Why the Delay?

“It’s almost as if the team is pretending things can’t be done, when in reality, they’re choosing not to do them.”

2. Intentional Stalling or Misguided Priorities?

3. The April Update: Nail in the Coffin?

If the update fails to deliver:

A serious and noticeable gameplay overhaul,
Authentic boxing tendencies for real-life fighters,
A fix to clunky or robotic movement and punch logic,
And communication that shows direction and accountability,

then many believe the game may be beyond saving in the eyes of both hardcore fans and the broader gaming community.

4. No Sense of Urgency, No Sense of Direction

There’s no public plan for refining AI, improving movement systems, expanding offline features, or even fixing critical issues that have been highlighted for over a year. To fans, it feels like:

The drive to innovate is gone.
The fight to save the game is not being fought.

5. A Call for Transparency and Action

Conclusion:

The April Update could either be the rebirth of Undisputed—or the moment boxing fans finally throw in the towel.

Steel City Interactive Comfortable Just Existing

🔍 1. Signs of Development Procrastination or Mismanagement

• Lack of urgency or visible progress:

Despite a strong early foundation (ESBC era), development has slowed to a crawl.
Features that should be core to a sim boxing game (dynamic punch reactions, AI realism, proper blocking systems, etc.) are either half-baked or missing.

• Roadmap inconsistency:

Promises from earlier dev logs or community updates have either been scrapped or “delayed indefinitely.”
No clear direction communicated on whether this is going to lean more sim or arcade—or worse, a limbo of both.

🧠 2. Ignoring Available Technology and Know-How

• Tech is here—developers just have to use it:

Movement capture through video analysis, procedural animation systems, dynamic AI patterns—all proven tech in 2025.
Even indie sports titles are implementing advanced AI learning or animation blending. Undisputed still relies on animations that feel disconnected and rigid.

• Community has provided blueprints:

Tons of fans, including yourself, have laid out deep, structured ideas for career modes, punch systems, AI tendencies, creation suites, and more.
Instead of engaging this feedback seriously, the devs seem to be focused on surface-level updates like cosmetic DLC.

🧨 3. The April Update Could Be a Tipping Point

• Community expectations are high:

If this update doesn’t address core gameplay and AI problems, it could confirm that the dev team has either lost the plot or is just trying to stretch the game for minimal gain.
There's almost a final chance vibe about this update. Either it proves that Undisputed can course-correct—or it becomes the moment fans turn away for good.

❓4. Possible Reasons Behind the Delays or Stagnation

• Intentional prolonging for monetization?

Some feel they’re drawing this out to maximize early access income without truly committing to polishing or finishing the game.

• Team lacks simulation-focused leadership?

There may be no one on the dev team who truly understands the sport or sim gaming. They’re possibly making decisions based on metrics, not immersion or realism.

• Poor internal direction:

A lot of choices feel like they’re made in isolation, not as part of a cohesive gameplay vision. That often leads to patchwork systems that don’t mesh together (e.g., unrealistic punch spam vs. stamina mechanics that barely matter).

🛠️ What Needs to Happen to Save It

• Transparent dev plan:

Give the community a real roadmap and explain what tech they will or won’t use—and why.

• Hardcore sim focus:

Double down on realism, and lean into your most loyal community segment who have stuck around since the ESBC days.

• Bring in experts or fans like Poeticdrink2u:

Let those who understand the sport help guide mechanics and direction—not after the fact, but at the design level.

• Show urgency with results, not talk:

Drop an April Update that finally tackles core gameplay—not just new boxers or ring announcer audio.

🧠It feels like the soul of the game is being neglected. With the right leadership, tech, and community involvement, Undisputed could have been the Fight Night successor people have begged for. But if the April Update flops, it might signal that the devs either can’t—or worse, won’t—save it.

Steel City Interactive Comfortable Just Existing

🔍 1. Signs of Development Procrastination or Mismanagement

• Lack of urgency or visible progress:

Despite a strong early foundation (ESBC era), development has slowed to a crawl.
Features that should be core to a sim boxing game (dynamic punch reactions, AI realism, proper blocking systems, etc.) are either half-baked or missing.

• Roadmap inconsistency:

Promises from earlier dev logs or community updates have either been scrapped or “delayed indefinitely.”
No clear direction communicated on whether this is going to lean more sim or arcade—or worse, a limbo of both.

🧠 2. Ignoring Available Technology and Know-How

• Tech is here—developers just have to use it:

Movement capture through video analysis, procedural animation systems, dynamic AI patterns—all proven tech in 2025.
Even indie sports titles are implementing advanced AI learning or animation blending. Undisputed still relies on animations that feel disconnected and rigid.

• Community has provided blueprints:

Tons of fans, including yourself, have laid out deep, structured ideas for career modes, punch systems, AI tendencies, creation suites, and more.
Instead of engaging this feedback seriously, the devs seem to be focused on surface-level updates like cosmetic DLC.

🧨 3. The April Update Could Be a Tipping Point

• Community expectations are high:

If this update doesn’t address core gameplay and AI problems, it could confirm that the dev team has either lost the plot or is just trying to stretch the game for minimal gain.
There's almost a final chance vibe about this update. Either it proves that Undisputed can course-correct—or it becomes the moment fans turn away for good.

❓4. Possible Reasons Behind the Delays or Stagnation

• Intentional prolonging for monetization?

Some feel they’re drawing this out to maximize early access income without truly committing to polishing or finishing the game.

• Team lacks simulation-focused leadership?

There may be no one on the dev team who truly understands the sport or sim gaming. They’re possibly making decisions based on metrics, not immersion or realism.

• Poor internal direction:

A lot of choices feel like they’re made in isolation, not as part of a cohesive gameplay vision. That often leads to patchwork systems that don’t mesh together (e.g., unrealistic punch spam vs. stamina mechanics that barely matter).

🛠️ What Needs to Happen to Save It

• Transparent dev plan:

Give the community a real roadmap and explain what tech they will or won’t use—and why.

• Hardcore sim focus:

Double down on realism, and lean into your most loyal community segment who have stuck around since the ESBC days.

• Bring in experts or fans like Poeticdrink2u:

Let those who understand the sport help guide mechanics and direction—not after the fact, but at the design level.

• Show urgency with results, not talk:

Drop an April Update that finally tackles core gameplay—not just new boxers or ring announcer audio.

🧠It feels like the soul of the game is being neglected. With the right leadership, tech, and community involvement, Undisputed could have been the Fight Night successor people have begged for. But if the April Update flops, it might signal that the devs either can’t—or worse, won’t—save it.

No More Excuses: If It’s Possible, Do It — The Standard for Sports & Boxing Games Has Evolved

Too often, companies limit their own vision or underestimate what’s possible with current technology, especially when fans have clearly shown what they want and that it's doable. “It’s too hard,” “that’s not feasible,” or “the budget doesn’t allow it” are not valid excuses when smaller teams or even solo developers have pulled off incredible feats in other genres.

Here’s a structured take:

🔧 What’s Actually Possible Today

AI-powered behavior modeling: You can train AI on fight footage to mimic real boxers without needing motion capture.
Realistic physics: Unity and Unreal already support detailed ragdoll, momentum, and punch physics if you prioritize them in your engine.
Dynamic Career Modes: Games like Football Manager and NBA 2K show the depth you can build with multiple branching paths.
Creation Suites: WWE 2K and Saints Row give deep customization that should be standard in any sports game today.

💡 Why Excuses Fall Flat

Excuse	Reality
"Too expensive"	Prioritize features that matter to your base. Realism over flash.
"Too complex"	If modders and solo devs are doing it, so can a funded studio.
"Fans won’t use it"	Let fans decide. Depth attracts serious players and builds longevity.
"It’s never been done before"	Perfect. Be the first and set the standard.

🥊 If You’re Making a Boxing Game, Don’t Cut Corners

Real punch variety? Possible.
Stumble animations when missing punches? Possible.
Rope interactions? Possible.
Clinch system? Very possible.
Separate tendencies and AI per fighter? Absolutely possible.
In-depth Creation Suite with announcer name/nickname audio? 100% doable.

✅ Bottom Line

Stop telling people it can’t be done. It can, and fans are waiting for someone bold enough to do it right. If a company isn’t up to the task, there are creators out there who are — and they deserve the spotlight.

Want help calling out more “can’t do” excuses in a list? Or maybe a bre

No More Excuses: If It’s Possible, Do It — The Standard for Sports & Boxing Games Has Evolved

Here’s a structured take:

🔧 What’s Actually Possible Today

AI-powered behavior modeling: You can train AI on fight footage to mimic real boxers without needing motion capture.
Realistic physics: Unity and Unreal already support detailed ragdoll, momentum, and punch physics if you prioritize them in your engine.
Dynamic Career Modes: Games like Football Manager and NBA 2K show the depth you can build with multiple branching paths.
Creation Suites: WWE 2K and Saints Row give deep customization that should be standard in any sports game today.

💡 Why Excuses Fall Flat

Excuse	Reality
"Too expensive"	Prioritize features that matter to your base. Realism over flash.
"Too complex"	If modders and solo devs are doing it, so can a funded studio.
"Fans won’t use it"	Let fans decide. Depth attracts serious players and builds longevity.
"It’s never been done before"	Perfect. Be the first and set the standard.

🥊 If You’re Making a Boxing Game, Don’t Cut Corners

Real punch variety? Possible.
Stumble animations when missing punches? Possible.
Rope interactions? Possible.
Clinch system? Very possible.
Separate tendencies and AI per fighter? Absolutely possible.
In-depth Creation Suite with announcer name/nickname audio? 100% doable.

✅ Bottom Line

Want help calling out more “can’t do” excuses in a list? Or maybe a bre

Sunday, March 23, 2025

Accepting Mediocrity: The Rift Between 'Undisputed' Loyalists and Real Boxing Fans

"Accepting Mediocrity: The Rift Between 'Undisputed' Loyalists and Real Boxing Fans"

A Growing Divide in the Boxing Game Community

The boxing gaming community is currently witnessing a growing divide. On one side are loyalists who have chosen to accept Undisputed “for what it is,” despite its shortcomings. On the other are boxing fans who continue to advocate for a true-to-life, realistic boxing simulation—one that respects and represents the sport of boxing in all its depth and complexity.

This clash of expectations is not just about taste. It’s about standards, vision, and accountability. And the friction is getting worse as those who demand realism are being met with hostility, not by developers, but by fellow players content with mediocrity.

The Problem With “Accept It for What It Is”

The phrase “accept it for what it is” has become a rallying cry among some supporters of Undisputed. But what does that even mean when applied to a game that marketed itself as the return of boxing to the video game world?

It’s a cop-out—plain and simple.

It’s the equivalent of watching a fighter shadowbox for 12 rounds and saying, “Well, at least he showed up.” It disregards the expectations set by Undisputed’s original trailers, early promises, and community engagement. More importantly, it undermines the long-standing desire among boxing fans for a simulation game that genuinely represents the sweet science.

Undisputed was supposed to be that game—or at least a step in that direction. So when it fails to deliver even the fundamental realism fans have been asking for, the backlash isn’t entitlement—it’s accountability.

Players Defending SCI Are Not Helping the Sport or the Genre

Steel City Interactive (SCI), the developers behind Undisputed, are not new to criticism. But the issue isn’t just about their decisions—it’s about the culture forming around their choices. Too many players have decided to defend SCI rather than push them to improve. These defenders see criticism as complaining, and constructive feedback as personal attacks.

This behavior has created a dangerous precedent:

When real boxing fans speak out about unrealistic animations, robotic movement, weak A.I., and lack of fundamental boxing mechanics, they’re met with “stop whining.”
When players ask for simulation elements that capture the heart of the sport—such as stamina dynamics, inside fighting, clinching, infighting, foot positioning, and punch variety—they’re told, “This isn’t Fight Night” or “Just enjoy what we have.”

But the truth is simple: if Undisputed is to truly honor boxing, it must be held to a higher standard. And the community should support that goal—not shame those fighting for it.

No More Excuses for SCI

SCI’s repeated responses and updates have often dodged the real issues. Promises get recycled. Concepts that were once highlighted as “core features” get sidelined or stripped down. Every new update seems to focus on cosmetics, minor tweaks, or damage control, instead of fixing the core gameplay flaws that prevent Undisputed from being a true boxing sim.

Let’s be clear: It’s been years.

We still don’t have realistic clinch mechanics.
We still don’t have diverse punch trajectories.
We still don’t have proper boxer tendencies, ring IQ, or footwork control.
We still don’t have a physics system that respects height, reach, weight, or stamina in a meaningful way.

Excuses like “it’s still in development,” “it’s only early access,” or “they’re a small team” are no longer valid shields. Players paid money for this game. Some pre-ordered, many promoted, and almost all hoped for something special. If a developer accepts money, they must accept accountability.

Final Thoughts: Stop Policing the Standards

The real enemy of progress isn’t the critic—it’s complacency. The fans asking for realism, depth, and representation are not trying to tear down the game—they’re trying to build it up.

The players who defend Undisputed unconditionally may think they’re showing loyalty, but they’re really just making it easier for SCI to keep ignoring what made the boxing genre great in the first place: authenticity.

Let fans speak. Let them demand. Let them envision a better boxing game. Because if Undisputed isn’t going to give them what they’ve waited over a decade for, someone else eventually will.

Accepting Mediocrity: The Rift Between 'Undisputed' Loyalists and Real Boxing Fans

"Accepting Mediocrity: The Rift Between 'Undisputed' Loyalists and Real Boxing Fans"

A Growing Divide in the Boxing Game Community

The Problem With “Accept It for What It Is”

It’s a cop-out—plain and simple.

Players Defending SCI Are Not Helping the Sport or the Genre

This behavior has created a dangerous precedent:

When real boxing fans speak out about unrealistic animations, robotic movement, weak A.I., and lack of fundamental boxing mechanics, they’re met with “stop whining.”
When players ask for simulation elements that capture the heart of the sport—such as stamina dynamics, inside fighting, clinching, infighting, foot positioning, and punch variety—they’re told, “This isn’t Fight Night” or “Just enjoy what we have.”

But the truth is simple: if Undisputed is to truly honor boxing, it must be held to a higher standard. And the community should support that goal—not shame those fighting for it.

No More Excuses for SCI

Let’s be clear: It’s been years.

We still don’t have realistic clinch mechanics.
We still don’t have diverse punch trajectories.
We still don’t have proper boxer tendencies, ring IQ, or footwork control.
We still don’t have a physics system that respects height, reach, weight, or stamina in a meaningful way.

Final Thoughts: Stop Policing the Standards

The real enemy of progress isn’t the critic—it’s complacency. The fans asking for realism, depth, and representation are not trying to tear down the game—they’re trying to build it up.

Let fans speak. Let them demand. Let them envision a better boxing game. Because if Undisputed isn’t going to give them what they’ve waited over a decade for, someone else eventually will.

Defense of the Broken

1. The Game Is Fundamentally Broken in Key Areas

Core mechanics like punch tracking, movement, and hit detection are inconsistent or outright bugged. That’s not a skill issue—it’s a systemic issue.
Unbalanced styles and poor AI mean that even CPU vs. CPU fights don't reflect anything close to real boxing. This breaks immersion for sim fans.

2. The “Get Good” Mentality Is Misplaced

Saying "you don’t know how to play" implies the game is deep and functional. But the problem isn’t lack of understanding—it’s that many mechanics either don’t work as intended or don't make sense within the context of boxing.
Criticism ≠ ignorance. A hardcore sim fan pointing out flaws is trying to help make the game better, not tear it down.

3. Some Fans Are Mistaking Loyalty for Quality

There’s a segment of the community that’s emotionally invested in Undisputed's success, which is understandable—many of us wanted it to be that game.
But defending poor execution only encourages mediocrity. If we don’t hold developers accountable, we’re saying it’s okay to sell us an unfinished or arcade-shifting product.

4. Honest Feedback is Being Dismissed

Many fans who ask for realistic improvements are treated like they’re “too demanding” or “stuck in the past,” when in reality, they’re the reason a game like this had potential in the first place.
It’s not toxic to want a boxing game to actually feel like boxing.

Final Thought

It’s not about hating on the game. It’s about wanting better—for boxing, for gamers, and for the future of sports simulations. If anything, Undisputed deserved more care, and fans deserve a product that respects their intelligence and passion.

If you want, I can help you craft a post or breakdown to express this viewpoint in a structured way to the community. Let me know.