Is Undisputed Dead?

 

Is Undisputed Dead?

The anticipation surrounding Undisputed, formerly known as eSports Boxing Club (ESBC), was once at an all-time high. Positioned as the first major boxing simulation game, it promised realism, depth, and an experience that boxing fans had long been craving. However, as time has passed and early access has continued with limited major updates, many are beginning to question: Is Undisputed dead?

---

A Promising Start That Fizzled?

When Undisputed was first announced, it generated massive excitement. Steel City Interactive (SCI) marketed the game as the most authentic boxing simulation ever created, boasting a roster filled with legends, an advanced footwork system, and highly detailed visuals. The initial trailers and gameplay footage fueled expectations that Undisputed could be the boxing game fans had waited decades for.

However, as early access continued, enthusiasm began to wane. Players started noticing issues that contradicted the game’s promise of realism. The punch variety was limited, the mechanics lacked fluidity, and fundamental aspects of boxing—such as proper defensive tools, inside fighting, and strategic AI—felt underdeveloped. Instead of refining its foundation, Undisputed began introducing questionable changes that moved it further from its original vision.

---

Where Did Things Go Wrong?

1. Early Access Fatigue

One of the biggest problems Undisputed faces is its prolonged early access phase. Early access can be beneficial, allowing developers to fine-tune their game based on community feedback. However, when updates slow down and the core gameplay fails to evolve significantly, it can leave players disillusioned. Many in the boxing gaming community have grown impatient, feeling as though SCI is not addressing the key concerns that would make Undisputed a true simulation.

2. Lack of a Clear Vision

Initially, Undisputed was marketed as the most realistic boxing game ever made. However, as development progressed, it became clear that the game was drifting toward a hybrid approach—one that attempted to balance realism with accessibility. This shift alienated hardcore boxing fans, who had supported the game based on its original promise of authenticity. The introduction of mechanics that felt more arcade-like, such as exaggerated stamina drain and limited defensive control, further frustrated players.

3. Inconsistent Gameplay Mechanics

While Undisputed boasts certain impressive mechanics—such as its footwork system and punch variety—its overall gameplay remains inconsistent. The punch impact lacks the weight and variety needed to reflect real boxing. Fighters often react unrealistically to strikes, and knockdowns feel scripted rather than dynamic. Additionally, some fighters have been given unrealistic abilities, with certain boxers moving in ways that do not align with their real-life counterparts.

4. Defensive Options Are Lacking

One of the most glaring issues with Undisputed is its weak defensive system. Boxing is just as much about defense as it is about offense, yet the game severely limits defensive tools. The blocking system is basic, and head movement is often ineffective. There is no real emphasis on different defensive styles, such as the Philly Shell, cross-armed defense, or the peek-a-boo style. Without a nuanced defensive system, fights often become slugfests rather than strategic battles.

5. Limited Inside Fighting Mechanics

Inside fighting is a crucial part of boxing, yet Undisputed has not been able to replicate it properly. Clinching is minimal, body shots lack impact, and there is no true infighting system where fighters can work on the inside effectively. Boxers who excel in close-quarters combat in real life, such as Joe Frazier or Mike Tyson, do not fight as they should in the game. This oversight removes an entire layer of strategy that should exist in a boxing simulation.

6. Career Mode and Offline Depth Are Underdeveloped

One of the biggest disappointments for many players is the lack of offline depth. Career mode, a crucial component for any sports simulation, remains largely underdeveloped. There is no true sense of progression, no deep customization options, and no elements that truly immerse the player in a boxer’s journey. There is no proper amateur system, no Olympic pathway, and no option to turn pro at different stages in a career. Without a compelling single-player experience, Undisputed feels like an incomplete game, especially for those who are not interested in online competition.

7. A Declining Player Base

Perhaps the most telling sign that Undisputed is struggling is its player base. When the game first launched in early access, it attracted a healthy number of players eager to test its mechanics. However, as time went on and updates failed to address major concerns, many players moved on. A game with a shrinking community—especially one reliant on online play—faces an uncertain future.

---

Can Undisputed Be Saved?

Despite its struggles, Undisputed is not necessarily dead—at least, not yet. The game still has potential, but it would require SCI to refocus on the core principles that made it appealing in the first place.

What Undisputed Needs to Do to Survive:

1. Commit to True Simulation – SCI must decide whether Undisputed is a true boxing simulation or an arcade hybrid. If realism is the goal, mechanics must be refined to reflect actual boxing strategy, movement, and physics.
2. Improve Punch Mechanics and Impact – Punches need more variety, better physics, and realistic reactions. The feeling of hitting an opponent should be satisfying, and knockdowns should be more organic.
3. Expand Defensive Options – Right now, defense feels underdeveloped. There should be a variety of blocking styles, more effective counters, and a better inside fighting system.
4. Develop a Real Inside Fighting System – Boxing is not just about fighting from a distance. Infighting, clinching, and mid-range exchanges should be fleshed out to reflect the different styles of real fighters.
5. Revamp Career Mode – If Undisputed wants to keep players engaged, it needs a compelling career mode with deep customization, rankings, stables, promoters, and a true sense of progression.
6. Fix AI and CPU vs. CPU Mechanics – AI should reflect real-life tendencies, and fighters should have unique styles. Watching two CPU fighters should feel like watching a real fight, not just a basic exchange of punches.
7. Listen to Hardcore Fans – The people who championed Undisputed from the beginning were hardcore boxing fans who wanted a true-to-life boxing simulation. Their feedback should shape the game's future, rather than chasing a broader audience at the expense of realism.

---

Conclusion: The Future of Undisputed

So, is Undisputed dead? Not entirely. However, it is at a crossroads. If SCI continues on its current path—failing to address core gameplay issues and alienating its original fanbase—then Undisputed may fade into obscurity like other failed boxing games before it.

However, if the developers take the necessary steps to refocus on realism, improve mechanics, and deliver a polished career mode, Undisputed still has a chance to become the definitive boxing simulation fans have been waiting for.

The question now is: Will Steel City Interactive rise to the challenge, or will Undisputed become just another missed opportunity in boxing gaming history?

Is Undisputed Dead?

 

Is Undisputed Dead?

The anticipation surrounding Undisputed, formerly known as eSports Boxing Club (ESBC), was once at an all-time high. Positioned as the first major boxing simulation game, it promised realism, depth, and an experience that boxing fans had long been craving. However, as time has passed and early access has continued with limited major updates, many are beginning to question: Is Undisputed dead?

---

A Promising Start That Fizzled?

When Undisputed was first announced, it generated massive excitement. Steel City Interactive (SCI) marketed the game as the most authentic boxing simulation ever created, boasting a roster filled with legends, an advanced footwork system, and highly detailed visuals. The initial trailers and gameplay footage fueled expectations that Undisputed could be the boxing game fans had waited decades for.

However, as early access continued, enthusiasm began to wane. Players started noticing issues that contradicted the game’s promise of realism. The punch variety was limited, the mechanics lacked fluidity, and fundamental aspects of boxing—such as proper defensive tools, inside fighting, and strategic AI—felt underdeveloped. Instead of refining its foundation, Undisputed began introducing questionable changes that moved it further from its original vision.

---

Where Did Things Go Wrong?

1. Early Access Fatigue

One of the biggest problems Undisputed faces is its prolonged early access phase. Early access can be beneficial, allowing developers to fine-tune their game based on community feedback. However, when updates slow down and the core gameplay fails to evolve significantly, it can leave players disillusioned. Many in the boxing gaming community have grown impatient, feeling as though SCI is not addressing the key concerns that would make Undisputed a true simulation.

2. Lack of a Clear Vision

Initially, Undisputed was marketed as the most realistic boxing game ever made. However, as development progressed, it became clear that the game was drifting toward a hybrid approach—one that attempted to balance realism with accessibility. This shift alienated hardcore boxing fans, who had supported the game based on its original promise of authenticity. The introduction of mechanics that felt more arcade-like, such as exaggerated stamina drain and limited defensive control, further frustrated players.

3. Inconsistent Gameplay Mechanics

While Undisputed boasts certain impressive mechanics—such as its footwork system and punch variety—its overall gameplay remains inconsistent. The punch impact lacks the weight and variety needed to reflect real boxing. Fighters often react unrealistically to strikes, and knockdowns feel scripted rather than dynamic. Additionally, some fighters have been given unrealistic abilities, with certain boxers moving in ways that do not align with their real-life counterparts.

4. Defensive Options Are Lacking

One of the most glaring issues with Undisputed is its weak defensive system. Boxing is just as much about defense as it is about offense, yet the game severely limits defensive tools. The blocking system is basic, and head movement is often ineffective. There is no real emphasis on different defensive styles, such as the Philly Shell, cross-armed defense, or the peek-a-boo style. Without a nuanced defensive system, fights often become slugfests rather than strategic battles.

5. Limited Inside Fighting Mechanics

Inside fighting is a crucial part of boxing, yet Undisputed has not been able to replicate it properly. Clinching is minimal, body shots lack impact, and there is no true infighting system where fighters can work on the inside effectively. Boxers who excel in close-quarters combat in real life, such as Joe Frazier or Mike Tyson, do not fight as they should in the game. This oversight removes an entire layer of strategy that should exist in a boxing simulation.

6. Career Mode and Offline Depth Are Underdeveloped

One of the biggest disappointments for many players is the lack of offline depth. Career mode, a crucial component for any sports simulation, remains largely underdeveloped. There is no true sense of progression, no deep customization options, and no elements that truly immerse the player in a boxer’s journey. There is no proper amateur system, no Olympic pathway, and no option to turn pro at different stages in a career. Without a compelling single-player experience, Undisputed feels like an incomplete game, especially for those who are not interested in online competition.

7. A Declining Player Base

Perhaps the most telling sign that Undisputed is struggling is its player base. When the game first launched in early access, it attracted a healthy number of players eager to test its mechanics. However, as time went on and updates failed to address major concerns, many players moved on. A game with a shrinking community—especially one reliant on online play—faces an uncertain future.

---

Can Undisputed Be Saved?

Despite its struggles, Undisputed is not necessarily dead—at least, not yet. The game still has potential, but it would require SCI to refocus on the core principles that made it appealing in the first place.

What Undisputed Needs to Do to Survive:

1. Commit to True Simulation – SCI must decide whether Undisputed is a true boxing simulation or an arcade hybrid. If realism is the goal, mechanics must be refined to reflect actual boxing strategy, movement, and physics.
2. Improve Punch Mechanics and Impact – Punches need more variety, better physics, and realistic reactions. The feeling of hitting an opponent should be satisfying, and knockdowns should be more organic.
3. Expand Defensive Options – Right now, defense feels underdeveloped. There should be a variety of blocking styles, more effective counters, and a better inside fighting system.
4. Develop a Real Inside Fighting System – Boxing is not just about fighting from a distance. Infighting, clinching, and mid-range exchanges should be fleshed out to reflect the different styles of real fighters.
5. Revamp Career Mode – If Undisputed wants to keep players engaged, it needs a compelling career mode with deep customization, rankings, stables, promoters, and a true sense of progression.
6. Fix AI and CPU vs. CPU Mechanics – AI should reflect real-life tendencies, and fighters should have unique styles. Watching two CPU fighters should feel like watching a real fight, not just a basic exchange of punches.
7. Listen to Hardcore Fans – The people who championed Undisputed from the beginning were hardcore boxing fans who wanted a true-to-life boxing simulation. Their feedback should shape the game's future, rather than chasing a broader audience at the expense of realism.

---

Conclusion: The Future of Undisputed

So, is Undisputed dead? Not entirely. However, it is at a crossroads. If SCI continues on its current path—failing to address core gameplay issues and alienating its original fanbase—then Undisputed may fade into obscurity like other failed boxing games before it.

However, if the developers take the necessary steps to refocus on realism, improve mechanics, and deliver a polished career mode, Undisputed still has a chance to become the definitive boxing simulation fans have been waiting for.

The question now is: Will Steel City Interactive rise to the challenge, or will Undisputed become just another missed opportunity in boxing gaming history?

Boxers and Trainers Must Speak Up About the State of Boxing Video Games

 

Boxers and Trainers Must Speak Up About the State of Boxing Video Games

The silence from professional boxers and trainers regarding the development of modern boxing video games is deafening. When a game is being created to represent their sport, their voices should be the loudest in the room. Yet, for reasons unknown, they remain largely absent from the conversation.

A rumor has circulated that Steel City Interactive (SCI), the developers of Undisputed, stopped having boxers actively involved in the studio early in development. This speculation seems to hold some weight, as many of the realistic boxing mechanics that fans initially praised are now either absent or significantly altered. The foundation of what could have been a truly groundbreaking simulation of the sport is slowly shifting toward an arcade-style fighting game instead of an authentic boxing experience.

When Undisputed was first introduced to the public under its early moniker, eSports Boxing Club (ESBC), it was heralded as the next big leap in boxing gaming. The mechanics showcased during the early phases appeared to emphasize realism—footwork, punch trajectories, defensive maneuvers, and the nuanced tactics that make boxing a chess match inside the ring. Fans assumed the game would continue to evolve, refining these mechanics and building upon its solid groundwork. Instead, what has transpired feels like a regression.

The removal or alteration of key mechanics suggests that someone within the studio either lacks an understanding of what boxing truly is or has deliberately pushed the game in a more arcade-friendly direction. The troubling part is that this transition happened after boxers were reportedly no longer being consulted in the development process. Could it be that without their direct input, the game is losing its authenticity? It certainly appears so.

Professional fighters and trainers who play video games should be among the most vocal critics and advocates for the genre. They are the ones who know the intricacies of the sport, who can spot what Undisputed gets right and what it gets wrong. They should be the ones demanding that a boxing game actually reflect boxing. Without their input, there is a risk that Undisputed will continue to move further away from realism and closer to being just another arcade fighter with a boxing skin.

If the rumors about SCI’s development direction are true, it is a major cause for concern. The industry has already suffered from a lack of high-quality boxing titles for years, and the last thing fans need is another misstep. It is crucial for boxers, trainers, and dedicated fans of the sport to raise their voices. If the development team is straying from realism, the boxing community needs to hold them accountable. Otherwise, boxing games may continue to be watered down, leaving fans longing for a true simulation that may never come.

Adding to the frustration is the fact that SCI initially promised innovation and realism, something that drew in hardcore boxing fans eager for a true representation of the sport. However, over time, many of those promises have been eroded or outright abandoned. Features that once looked like game-changers have either been removed or replaced with mechanics that prioritize accessibility over authenticity. This shift raises an important question—was the original vision for Undisputed compromised by external pressures, or was the commitment to realism never as strong as fans were led to believe?

The consequences of a misstep in development are far-reaching. If Undisputed veers too far into arcade territory, it could discourage future developers from attempting a true boxing simulation. Investors and publishers may see the genre as unviable, believing that fans prefer an arcade experience rather than the deep, tactical gameplay that boxing truly requires. This is why it's imperative for fans, boxers, and trainers alike to push back against these changes and demand a game that does justice to the sport.

Another troubling aspect of this shift is the exclusion of passionate boxing fans from discussions and online communities. Many dedicated fans who voiced concerns about realism being sacrificed have been pushed out of groups and forums where these discussions take place. This has created an echo chamber that favors a more casual, arcade-style experience while silencing those who want an authentic boxing game. Instead of embracing constructive criticism, it seems like certain spaces have actively worked to suppress it, making it even more difficult for realism to remain a priority in development.

If the developers still care about realism, they need to bring boxers and trainers back into the conversation. They need to listen to those who understand the sport at its deepest levels. Otherwise, Undisputed risks becoming yet another cautionary tale of what happens when developers lose sight of their original vision. The time to speak up is now before it's too late.

Boxers and Trainers Must Speak Up About the State of Boxing Video Games

 

Boxers and Trainers Must Speak Up About the State of Boxing Video Games

The silence from professional boxers and trainers regarding the development of modern boxing video games is deafening. When a game is being created to represent their sport, their voices should be the loudest in the room. Yet, for reasons unknown, they remain largely absent from the conversation.

A rumor has circulated that Steel City Interactive (SCI), the developers of Undisputed, stopped having boxers actively involved in the studio early in development. This speculation seems to hold some weight, as many of the realistic boxing mechanics that fans initially praised are now either absent or significantly altered. The foundation of what could have been a truly groundbreaking simulation of the sport is slowly shifting toward an arcade-style fighting game instead of an authentic boxing experience.

When Undisputed was first introduced to the public under its early moniker, eSports Boxing Club (ESBC), it was heralded as the next big leap in boxing gaming. The mechanics showcased during the early phases appeared to emphasize realism—footwork, punch trajectories, defensive maneuvers, and the nuanced tactics that make boxing a chess match inside the ring. Fans assumed the game would continue to evolve, refining these mechanics and building upon its solid groundwork. Instead, what has transpired feels like a regression.

The removal or alteration of key mechanics suggests that someone within the studio either lacks an understanding of what boxing truly is or has deliberately pushed the game in a more arcade-friendly direction. The troubling part is that this transition happened after boxers were reportedly no longer being consulted in the development process. Could it be that without their direct input, the game is losing its authenticity? It certainly appears so.

Professional fighters and trainers who play video games should be among the most vocal critics and advocates for the genre. They are the ones who know the intricacies of the sport, who can spot what Undisputed gets right and what it gets wrong. They should be the ones demanding that a boxing game actually reflect boxing. Without their input, there is a risk that Undisputed will continue to move further away from realism and closer to being just another arcade fighter with a boxing skin.

If the rumors about SCI’s development direction are true, it is a major cause for concern. The industry has already suffered from a lack of high-quality boxing titles for years, and the last thing fans need is another misstep. It is crucial for boxers, trainers, and dedicated fans of the sport to raise their voices. If the development team is straying from realism, the boxing community needs to hold them accountable. Otherwise, boxing games may continue to be watered down, leaving fans longing for a true simulation that may never come.

Adding to the frustration is the fact that SCI initially promised innovation and realism, something that drew in hardcore boxing fans eager for a true representation of the sport. However, over time, many of those promises have been eroded or outright abandoned. Features that once looked like game-changers have either been removed or replaced with mechanics that prioritize accessibility over authenticity. This shift raises an important question—was the original vision for Undisputed compromised by external pressures, or was the commitment to realism never as strong as fans were led to believe?

The consequences of a misstep in development are far-reaching. If Undisputed veers too far into arcade territory, it could discourage future developers from attempting a true boxing simulation. Investors and publishers may see the genre as unviable, believing that fans prefer an arcade experience rather than the deep, tactical gameplay that boxing truly requires. This is why it's imperative for fans, boxers, and trainers alike to push back against these changes and demand a game that does justice to the sport.

Another troubling aspect of this shift is the exclusion of passionate boxing fans from discussions and online communities. Many dedicated fans who voiced concerns about realism being sacrificed have been pushed out of groups and forums where these discussions take place. This has created an echo chamber that favors a more casual, arcade-style experience while silencing those who want an authentic boxing game. Instead of embracing constructive criticism, it seems like certain spaces have actively worked to suppress it, making it even more difficult for realism to remain a priority in development.

If the developers still care about realism, they need to bring boxers and trainers back into the conversation. They need to listen to those who understand the sport at its deepest levels. Otherwise, Undisputed risks becoming yet another cautionary tale of what happens when developers lose sight of their original vision. The time to speak up is now before it's too late.

SCI Can Learn from NBA 2K’s Success by Hiring Hardcore Boxing Fans and Industry Experts

 

SCI Can Learn from NBA 2K’s Success by Hiring Hardcore Boxing Fans and Industry Experts

Steel City Interactive (SCI), the developers behind Undisputed, are facing growing scrutiny from boxing fans regarding the state of their game. Many are questioning whether the company has made the right hiring choices, as the game continues to struggle with mechanics, realism, and core gameplay elements that should reflect the sport of boxing. Fans are pointing to the success of NBA 2K as a model for how a boxing game should be built—by hiring individuals deeply connected to the sport, including hardcore fans, former boxers, trainers, and industry professionals.

The NBA 2K Blueprint for Success

One of the key reasons NBA 2K has remained the premier basketball simulation for years is its commitment to realism. Visual Concepts, the developer of NBA 2K, has consistently hired former NBA players, analysts, and basketball enthusiasts who understand the nuances of the sport. They bring expertise that helps shape gameplay mechanics, player tendencies, and game modes in ways that feel authentic to fans. By integrating these experts into the development process, NBA 2K ensures that the gameplay reflects the actual sport, making it an engaging and rewarding experience for players.

SCI’s Hiring Choices Raise Concerns

In contrast, SCI’s hiring decisions have left many boxing fans perplexed. While some hires may have industry experience, it’s unclear if they possess a true passion for or deep knowledge of boxing. The result? A game that feels disconnected from the sport it’s trying to simulate. Undisputed has received criticism for unrealistic movement, awkward punch mechanics, and gameplay that often ignores fundamental boxing strategies. Fans are now questioning whether these issues stem from a lack of true boxing minds in the development process.

Why Hiring Hardcore Boxing Fans and Industry Experts Matters

1. Understanding of the Sport – Hardcore boxing fans and industry experts know what makes boxing unique. They understand the importance of feints, defensive maneuvers, stamina management, and realistic punch trajectories. This knowledge is crucial for developing an authentic boxing simulation.

2. Player Tendencies and Styles – Just as NBA 2K replicates the playing styles of real basketball players, a boxing game should ensure that real-life fighters have accurate tendencies and behaviors. Hiring trainers, boxers, and analysts would help SCI capture these details.

3. Game Balance and Mechanics – Having people who truly know boxing can prevent developers from implementing arcade-style mechanics that alienate fans of the sport. A sim-based boxing game requires deep understanding, not just generic fight animations.

4. Community Trust and Engagement – When fans see that developers respect and understand the sport, they are more likely to support the game long-term. Having well-known and respected figures from the boxing world involved in development can build credibility and trust.

The Current State of Undisputed

The criticism of Undisputed largely stems from the gameplay not meeting expectations for a realistic boxing simulation. Issues such as unnatural footwork, repetitive animations, questionable stamina management, and unbalanced mechanics are frustrating players. These flaws suggest that the team behind the game lacks a deep understanding of boxing fundamentals.

While SCI has attempted to engage with the community and take feedback, their response time and execution have been inconsistent. Many believe that hiring more knowledgeable individuals would help bridge the gap between what fans expect and what SCI is currently delivering.

What SCI Should Do Moving Forward

• Hire Hardcore Boxing Fans – Passionate fans who understand the sport will advocate for the details that make boxing unique.

• Bring in Boxing Experts – Trainers, former fighters, and analysts can provide valuable insights on mechanics and realism.

• Study Successful Sports Games – Following NBA 2K’s approach of using real-world expertise can elevate Undisputed to the next level.

• Listen to the Community – The fans have been vocal about what they want, and SCI needs to acknowledge and implement their feedback properly.

Conclusion

SCI has an opportunity to create the definitive boxing simulation, but that will only happen if they take the right approach. By following in the footsteps of NBA 2K and hiring individuals who live and breathe boxing, they can refine Undisputed into the game that boxing fans have been waiting for. The blueprint for success is there—SCI just needs to follow it.

SCI Can Learn from NBA 2K’s Success by Hiring Hardcore Boxing Fans and Industry Experts

 

SCI Can Learn from NBA 2K’s Success by Hiring Hardcore Boxing Fans and Industry Experts

Steel City Interactive (SCI), the developers behind Undisputed, are facing growing scrutiny from boxing fans regarding the state of their game. Many are questioning whether the company has made the right hiring choices, as the game continues to struggle with mechanics, realism, and core gameplay elements that should reflect the sport of boxing. Fans are pointing to the success of NBA 2K as a model for how a boxing game should be built—by hiring individuals deeply connected to the sport, including hardcore fans, former boxers, trainers, and industry professionals.

The NBA 2K Blueprint for Success

One of the key reasons NBA 2K has remained the premier basketball simulation for years is its commitment to realism. Visual Concepts, the developer of NBA 2K, has consistently hired former NBA players, analysts, and basketball enthusiasts who understand the nuances of the sport. They bring expertise that helps shape gameplay mechanics, player tendencies, and game modes in ways that feel authentic to fans. By integrating these experts into the development process, NBA 2K ensures that the gameplay reflects the actual sport, making it an engaging and rewarding experience for players.

SCI’s Hiring Choices Raise Concerns

In contrast, SCI’s hiring decisions have left many boxing fans perplexed. While some hires may have industry experience, it’s unclear if they possess a true passion for or deep knowledge of boxing. The result? A game that feels disconnected from the sport it’s trying to simulate. Undisputed has received criticism for unrealistic movement, awkward punch mechanics, and gameplay that often ignores fundamental boxing strategies. Fans are now questioning whether these issues stem from a lack of true boxing minds in the development process.

Why Hiring Hardcore Boxing Fans and Industry Experts Matters

1. Understanding of the Sport – Hardcore boxing fans and industry experts know what makes boxing unique. They understand the importance of feints, defensive maneuvers, stamina management, and realistic punch trajectories. This knowledge is crucial for developing an authentic boxing simulation.

2. Player Tendencies and Styles – Just as NBA 2K replicates the playing styles of real basketball players, a boxing game should ensure that real-life fighters have accurate tendencies and behaviors. Hiring trainers, boxers, and analysts would help SCI capture these details.

3. Game Balance and Mechanics – Having people who truly know boxing can prevent developers from implementing arcade-style mechanics that alienate fans of the sport. A sim-based boxing game requires deep understanding, not just generic fight animations.

4. Community Trust and Engagement – When fans see that developers respect and understand the sport, they are more likely to support the game long-term. Having well-known and respected figures from the boxing world involved in development can build credibility and trust.

The Current State of Undisputed

The criticism of Undisputed largely stems from the gameplay not meeting expectations for a realistic boxing simulation. Issues such as unnatural footwork, repetitive animations, questionable stamina management, and unbalanced mechanics are frustrating players. These flaws suggest that the team behind the game lacks a deep understanding of boxing fundamentals.

While SCI has attempted to engage with the community and take feedback, their response time and execution have been inconsistent. Many believe that hiring more knowledgeable individuals would help bridge the gap between what fans expect and what SCI is currently delivering.

What SCI Should Do Moving Forward

• Hire Hardcore Boxing Fans – Passionate fans who understand the sport will advocate for the details that make boxing unique.

• Bring in Boxing Experts – Trainers, former fighters, and analysts can provide valuable insights on mechanics and realism.

• Study Successful Sports Games – Following NBA 2K’s approach of using real-world expertise can elevate Undisputed to the next level.

• Listen to the Community – The fans have been vocal about what they want, and SCI needs to acknowledge and implement their feedback properly.

Conclusion

SCI has an opportunity to create the definitive boxing simulation, but that will only happen if they take the right approach. By following in the footsteps of NBA 2K and hiring individuals who live and breathe boxing, they can refine Undisputed into the game that boxing fans have been waiting for. The blueprint for success is there—SCI just needs to follow it.

Creating a realistic boxing video game requires...

 

Creating a realistic boxing video game requires a well-structured development team with expertise in multiple disciplines to ensure authenticity in gameplay, visuals, AI, and presentation. Here’s how a company should structure its development team:

1. Leadership & Production Team

• Game Director – Oversees the vision and execution of the game, ensuring it aligns with realism and authenticity.
• Executive Producer – Manages timelines, budget, and resources while ensuring smooth communication across teams.
• Project Managers – Handle scheduling, task assignments, and team coordination.

2. Game Design Team

• Lead Game Designer – Ensures the game mechanics, controls, and overall gameplay align with realistic boxing.
• Gameplay Designers – Focus on mechanics such as movement, punch variations, clinching, blocking, counters, and AI.
• AI Designers – Develop a system that makes boxers fight according to their real-life tendencies or specific styles.
• Camera & Presentation Designers – Work on realistic broadcast-style angles, replays, ring walks, and presentation features.
• UI/UX Designers – Ensure an intuitive and immersive experience for menus, HUD, and fight statistics.

3. Animation & Motion Team

• Animation Director – Oversees movement and punch animations for fluidity and realism.
• Animators – Create lifelike movements for punches, footwork, defensive maneuvers, knockdowns, and reactions.
• Motion Capture Specialists – Capture realistic movements, but should also incorporate AI-driven physics-based animation (optional for realism).
• Procedural Animation Engineers – Develop real-time physics-driven movements for better transitions and organic reactions.

4. Art & Visual Team

• Art Director – Ensures the visual fidelity of character models, arenas, lighting, and textures.
• Character Artists – Create highly detailed boxer models with realistic textures, skin tones, and facial animations.
• Environmental Artists – Design arenas, gyms, locker rooms, and other backgrounds.
• Lighting & VFX Artists – Enhance realism with proper lighting, sweat effects, blood physics, and impact visuals.

5. Audio Team

• Audio Director – Oversees sound design for immersion.
• Sound Engineers – Develop realistic punch sounds, breathing, crowd reactions, and environmental audio.
• Commentary & Voice Designers – Record and integrate realistic, dynamic commentary and boxer grunts/reactions.
• Ring Announcers & Referees Audio Team – Record authentic referee commands and ring announcer introductions.

6. Engineering & AI Development Team

• Lead Engineer – Oversees technical implementation and game engine optimization.
• Gameplay Programmers – Code the boxing mechanics, movement, hit detection, physics, and stamina systems.
• AI Programmers – Develop intelligent, adaptable AI that mimics real boxing strategies and tendencies.
• Physics Programmers – Work on ragdoll effects, punch impact physics, foot planting, and rope interactions.
• Online & Networking Engineers – Ensure smooth online matchmaking, lag reduction, and ranked/unranked modes.

7. Boxing Consultants & Research Team

• Boxing Trainers & Experts – Advise on realistic movement, strategies, and tendencies.
• Professional Boxers – Provide feedback on feel, mechanics, and realism.
• Cutmen & Referees – Ensure authentic representation of in-game stoppages, cuts, and referee interventions.
• Statisticians & Historians – Ensure accurate rankings, records, and fighter attributes.

8. Quality Assurance (QA) & Playtesting

• QA Testers – Identify and report bugs, glitches, and inconsistencies.
• Playtesters – Evaluate realism and authenticity in gameplay mechanics.
• Balance & Tuning Team – Ensure that different boxer styles, strengths, and weaknesses are properly balanced.

9. Marketing & Community Engagement

• Marketing Director – Plans the promotion strategy.
• Social Media & Community Managers – Engage with fans and take feedback.
• Content Creators & Influencers – Partner with boxing gaming enthusiasts for outreach.

By structuring the development team this way, the company can ensure that the game is an authentic representation of boxing while being polished, balanced, and immersive.

Creating a realistic boxing video game requires...

 

Creating a realistic boxing video game requires a well-structured development team with expertise in multiple disciplines to ensure authenticity in gameplay, visuals, AI, and presentation. Here’s how a company should structure its development team:

1. Leadership & Production Team

• Game Director – Oversees the vision and execution of the game, ensuring it aligns with realism and authenticity.
• Executive Producer – Manages timelines, budget, and resources while ensuring smooth communication across teams.
• Project Managers – Handle scheduling, task assignments, and team coordination.

2. Game Design Team

• Lead Game Designer – Ensures the game mechanics, controls, and overall gameplay align with realistic boxing.
• Gameplay Designers – Focus on mechanics such as movement, punch variations, clinching, blocking, counters, and AI.
• AI Designers – Develop a system that makes boxers fight according to their real-life tendencies or specific styles.
• Camera & Presentation Designers – Work on realistic broadcast-style angles, replays, ring walks, and presentation features.
• UI/UX Designers – Ensure an intuitive and immersive experience for menus, HUD, and fight statistics.

3. Animation & Motion Team

• Animation Director – Oversees movement and punch animations for fluidity and realism.
• Animators – Create lifelike movements for punches, footwork, defensive maneuvers, knockdowns, and reactions.
• Motion Capture Specialists – Capture realistic movements, but should also incorporate AI-driven physics-based animation (optional for realism).
• Procedural Animation Engineers – Develop real-time physics-driven movements for better transitions and organic reactions.

4. Art & Visual Team

• Art Director – Ensures the visual fidelity of character models, arenas, lighting, and textures.
• Character Artists – Create highly detailed boxer models with realistic textures, skin tones, and facial animations.
• Environmental Artists – Design arenas, gyms, locker rooms, and other backgrounds.
• Lighting & VFX Artists – Enhance realism with proper lighting, sweat effects, blood physics, and impact visuals.

5. Audio Team

• Audio Director – Oversees sound design for immersion.
• Sound Engineers – Develop realistic punch sounds, breathing, crowd reactions, and environmental audio.
• Commentary & Voice Designers – Record and integrate realistic, dynamic commentary and boxer grunts/reactions.
• Ring Announcers & Referees Audio Team – Record authentic referee commands and ring announcer introductions.

6. Engineering & AI Development Team

• Lead Engineer – Oversees technical implementation and game engine optimization.
• Gameplay Programmers – Code the boxing mechanics, movement, hit detection, physics, and stamina systems.
• AI Programmers – Develop intelligent, adaptable AI that mimics real boxing strategies and tendencies.
• Physics Programmers – Work on ragdoll effects, punch impact physics, foot planting, and rope interactions.
• Online & Networking Engineers – Ensure smooth online matchmaking, lag reduction, and ranked/unranked modes.

7. Boxing Consultants & Research Team

• Boxing Trainers & Experts – Advise on realistic movement, strategies, and tendencies.
• Professional Boxers – Provide feedback on feel, mechanics, and realism.
• Cutmen & Referees – Ensure authentic representation of in-game stoppages, cuts, and referee interventions.
• Statisticians & Historians – Ensure accurate rankings, records, and fighter attributes.

8. Quality Assurance (QA) & Playtesting

• QA Testers – Identify and report bugs, glitches, and inconsistencies.
• Playtesters – Evaluate realism and authenticity in gameplay mechanics.
• Balance & Tuning Team – Ensure that different boxer styles, strengths, and weaknesses are properly balanced.

9. Marketing & Community Engagement

• Marketing Director – Plans the promotion strategy.
• Social Media & Community Managers – Engage with fans and take feedback.
• Content Creators & Influencers – Partner with boxing gaming enthusiasts for outreach.

By structuring the development team this way, the company can ensure that the game is an authentic representation of boxing while being polished, balanced, and immersive.

 

The Sad Attempt to Silence a Passionate Boxing Video Game Advocate

The boxing video game community has long been starved for a truly immersive and realistic experience. With no major simulation boxing game released in over a decade, fans have been left clinging to hopes and promises, often disappointed by underwhelming attempts. But within this void, a few voices have risen to champion the cause of a deep, realistic, and simulation-driven boxing experience. One such voice—arguably the most relentless and passionate—has been under attack simply for pushing the industry to do better.

A Voice for the Boxing Gaming Community

Poeticdrink2u (Poe) has been one of the loudest, most consistent advocates for a true-to-life boxing video game, demanding that developers respect the sport and its intricacies. His push for realism isn’t just about making a game look good but ensuring that it feels like the sport—where every punch, every feint, and every defensive maneuver matters. He envisions a game where tendencies, styles, movement, and reactions reflect real-life boxing, rather than a watered-down arcade experience disguised as a simulation.

While some in the gaming industry focus on marketability and accessibility, Poe has never wavered from his stance that a boxing game should cater first and foremost to boxing fans—those who appreciate the sport's depth and nuance. This unwavering passion has made him a target for those who would rather silence criticism than improve the product.

The Movement to Shut Him Down

Instead of engaging in meaningful dialogue, some have resorted to dismissing or outright silencing his voice. The reasons are telling:

• He Challenges the Status Quo – Poe’s detailed breakdowns of what makes a boxing game truly immersive expose the shortcuts and compromises that developers often make. Some people don’t want to hear that the “simulation” they are promoting is missing critical elements.
• He Refuses to Be Complacent – While many settle for what’s given, Poe keeps pushing. He doesn’t believe in excuses like “it’s too hard to develop” or “casuals won’t understand.” His argument is simple: if the technology exists, why not use it?
• He Won’t Let Companies Rebrand Mediocrity as Realism – In the gaming industry, companies often slap a “simulation” label on a product that barely scratches the surface of authenticity. Poe has called this out repeatedly, making it harder for these companies to sell their games on empty promises.

Because of this, his voice is being drowned out by a movement that would rather see a compromised, mass-market-friendly game than a deep, fully realized boxing simulation. Some dismiss him as "too demanding" or "never satisfied," but the reality is that he represents an entire community that is tired of being ignored.

The Importance of Unwavering Advocacy

If history has taught us anything, it’s that real progress comes from those unwilling to accept mediocrity. The greatest sports games—titles like NFL 2K5, Fight Night Champion, and NBA 2K in its prime—were built by developers who pushed boundaries, not by those who played it safe.

The attempt to silence a voice like Poe’s is an attempt to silence the very essence of what makes gaming communities great: passionate players who demand excellence. His critiques aren’t meant to tear down games but to build something better. The developers who listen—who take the challenge seriously—will be the ones who create a game that stands the test of time.

The Real Fight: Passion vs. Complacency

At its core, this is a battle between passion and complacency. Should the boxing video game community settle for yet another half-baked attempt, or should they rally behind those who are fighting for something greater? If a game is truly good, it should be able to withstand scrutiny. If it can’t, maybe it’s not as great as some claim.

The movement to silence Poe is a sad reflection of an industry that too often prioritizes quick sales over lasting quality. But boxing fans and gamers alike should remember: it’s the voices that demand more that ultimately bring about real change.

And that’s why Poe should never be silenced.

 

The Sad Attempt to Silence a Passionate Boxing Video Game Advocate

The boxing video game community has long been starved for a truly immersive and realistic experience. With no major simulation boxing game released in over a decade, fans have been left clinging to hopes and promises, often disappointed by underwhelming attempts. But within this void, a few voices have risen to champion the cause of a deep, realistic, and simulation-driven boxing experience. One such voice—arguably the most relentless and passionate—has been under attack simply for pushing the industry to do better.

A Voice for the Boxing Gaming Community

Poeticdrink2u (Poe) has been one of the loudest, most consistent advocates for a true-to-life boxing video game, demanding that developers respect the sport and its intricacies. His push for realism isn’t just about making a game look good but ensuring that it feels like the sport—where every punch, every feint, and every defensive maneuver matters. He envisions a game where tendencies, styles, movement, and reactions reflect real-life boxing, rather than a watered-down arcade experience disguised as a simulation.

While some in the gaming industry focus on marketability and accessibility, Poe has never wavered from his stance that a boxing game should cater first and foremost to boxing fans—those who appreciate the sport's depth and nuance. This unwavering passion has made him a target for those who would rather silence criticism than improve the product.

The Movement to Shut Him Down

Instead of engaging in meaningful dialogue, some have resorted to dismissing or outright silencing his voice. The reasons are telling:

• He Challenges the Status Quo – Poe’s detailed breakdowns of what makes a boxing game truly immersive expose the shortcuts and compromises that developers often make. Some people don’t want to hear that the “simulation” they are promoting is missing critical elements.
• He Refuses to Be Complacent – While many settle for what’s given, Poe keeps pushing. He doesn’t believe in excuses like “it’s too hard to develop” or “casuals won’t understand.” His argument is simple: if the technology exists, why not use it?
• He Won’t Let Companies Rebrand Mediocrity as Realism – In the gaming industry, companies often slap a “simulation” label on a product that barely scratches the surface of authenticity. Poe has called this out repeatedly, making it harder for these companies to sell their games on empty promises.

Because of this, his voice is being drowned out by a movement that would rather see a compromised, mass-market-friendly game than a deep, fully realized boxing simulation. Some dismiss him as "too demanding" or "never satisfied," but the reality is that he represents an entire community that is tired of being ignored.

The Importance of Unwavering Advocacy

If history has taught us anything, it’s that real progress comes from those unwilling to accept mediocrity. The greatest sports games—titles like NFL 2K5, Fight Night Champion, and NBA 2K in its prime—were built by developers who pushed boundaries, not by those who played it safe.

The attempt to silence a voice like Poe’s is an attempt to silence the very essence of what makes gaming communities great: passionate players who demand excellence. His critiques aren’t meant to tear down games but to build something better. The developers who listen—who take the challenge seriously—will be the ones who create a game that stands the test of time.

The Real Fight: Passion vs. Complacency

At its core, this is a battle between passion and complacency. Should the boxing video game community settle for yet another half-baked attempt, or should they rally behind those who are fighting for something greater? If a game is truly good, it should be able to withstand scrutiny. If it can’t, maybe it’s not as great as some claim.

The movement to silence Poe is a sad reflection of an industry that too often prioritizes quick sales over lasting quality. But boxing fans and gamers alike should remember: it’s the voices that demand more that ultimately bring about real change.

And that’s why Poe should never be silenced.

 

The Fight for a Realistic Boxing Video Game: A Passionate Gamer’s Journey

Boxing is more than a sport; it’s an art, a science, and a way of life. For over a decade, I lived and breathed it—stepping into the ring as both an amateur and professional fighter. But my passion for the sport didn’t stop there. When the gloves came off, I found myself drawn into another ring—the world of boxing video games.

From the early days of Knockout Kings to Fight Night, I was a day-one fan, fully immersed in the gaming experience. I became a moderator, then a Senior Moderator, working my way up through the EA community ranks. But at the core of everything, I was—and always will be—a fan first. My passion for boxing and gaming always took precedence over business and politics, pushing me to advocate for the best possible simulation of the sport I love.

The Wishlist Mafia and the Fight for Realism

Over the years, I’ve become known as an idea guy, constantly coming up with new ways to make a realistic boxing video game. I organized a group called the Wishlist Mafia, a collective of like-minded fans who wanted to see the genre evolve. We compiled an extensive wishlist and presented it directly to Brizzo, one of EA’s lead developers. We wanted to make sure the voices of the hardcore boxing community were heard—those who wanted a true-to-life experience, not just another arcade-style button masher.

A Silent Yet Outspoken Voice in the Community

While I’m not always the loudest in the room, I’ve had my hands in shaping the boxing gaming community. I’ve helped organize tournaments, hosted three different podcast shows, and run a YouTube channel where I continue to push for realism in boxing games. I’ve spent countless hours engaging with other fans, discussing mechanics, realism, and what makes a great boxing game stand out from the rest.

The Mission: A True-to-Life Boxing Simulation

My mission is simple—to make sure developers understand that realism is not a niche demand; it’s what boxing fans deserve. The sweet science is built on skill, strategy, and unpredictability, and a game that properly captures that essence would be a revolution in the sports gaming world. We don’t need gimmicks or watered-down mechanics; we need depth, customization, and authenticity.

I continue to push for my voice to be heard, hoping that the next generation of boxing video games will reflect the sport in all its glory. The fans are here. The ideas are here. Now, it’s time for the developers to step up and deliver the boxing game we’ve been waiting for.

If you’re a fan of the sport and want to see a truly realistic boxing video game come to life, join the movement. Let’s make it happen.

---