---

Dragon Age: The True Canon to Sandal Should Have Been in Inquisition and The Veilguard

By [Poe Egerton]

The Dragon Age series has always thrived on its rich lore, compelling characters, and deep world-building. Yet, as Dragon Age: The Veilguard nears release, it's becoming evident that BioWare has left much of its past storytelling potential on the table. One of the most glaring missed opportunities is the absence of Sandal—the enigmatic dwarven savant with cryptic connections to the Fade and the mysterious workings of the world. His true canon story, hinted at throughout Dragon Age: Origins and Dragon Age II, should have been fully explored in Inquisition and certainly in The Veilguard.

Instead, BioWare seems to be distancing itself from its own narrative roots, making drastic changes that feel less like creative evolution and more like a deliberate attempt to sever ties with what made Dragon Age great. The result? A game launching with failure attached to it—seemingly engineered to alienate long-time fans and sink the franchise altogether.

---

Sandal: The Forgotten Key to Dragon Age’s Greatest Mystery

For those who have followed the Dragon Age series closely, Sandal was never just a quirky side character. His bizarre prophetic statements, unnatural magical abilities despite being a dwarf, and cryptic comments about the "coming darkness" painted him as a crucial figure in the unfolding events of Thedas. His fate was left unresolved after Dragon Age II, with Inquisition failing to provide even a hint of closure.

The idea that Veilguard—a game set to revolve around the chaos of the Veil and the looming war against Solas—has completely ignored Sandal’s role is a baffling decision. Given his unexplained knowledge of the Fade, his connection to enchantments that defy logic, and the hints that he may be something far more than he appears, he should have played a pivotal role in the upcoming game. Yet, BioWare seems intent on ignoring its own world-building.

---

The Problem with The Veilguard: A Deliberate Disconnect?

It’s one thing for a franchise to evolve; it’s another to abandon its foundations entirely. The Veilguard is not just a departure from Dragon Age’s past—it feels like a reboot disguised as a sequel. The drastic shift in tone, the erasure of key past characters, and the complete abandonment of the game’s darkest, most intriguing mysteries suggest a deliberate effort to steer the franchise into unfamiliar and, arguably, unwelcome territory.

This raises a serious question: Was Veilguard designed to fail? The early response from fans has been overwhelmingly negative, with criticisms aimed at the game’s art direction, character designs, and its apparent prioritization of accessibility over depth. It’s as if BioWare is setting the stage for Dragon Age to fizzle out, blaming the fans for “not showing up” when, in reality, the studio has systematically removed everything that once made the series compelling.

---

Missed Potential: A Series That Could Have Been So Much More

Dragon Age has a wealth of unfinished stories and unexplored lore that could have strengthened Veilguard’s narrative. The unresolved fates of characters like Sandal, the Architect, and even the Grey Wardens’ mysterious origins are just a few examples of threads left hanging. Instead of capitalizing on these established storylines, BioWare appears to be wiping the slate clean, ignoring the very lore that set Dragon Age apart from other fantasy RPGs.

The idea that Veilguard could have seamlessly woven these elements into its narrative makes the game’s current trajectory even more frustrating. If Sandal had been given his rightful place in the story, if Veilguard had truly embraced its own lore instead of discarding it, the game could have been a triumphant continuation rather than what now feels like a poorly executed soft reboot.

---

Conclusion: A Franchise Lost in Its Own Shadow

At its core, Dragon Age was always about intricate storytelling, deep lore, and meaningful choices. By failing to acknowledge its past, BioWare isn’t just making a questionable design choice—it’s actively dismantling the very essence of what made Dragon Age beloved.

The absence of Sandal in Inquisition and now Veilguard is more than just an oversight; it’s symbolic of the larger problem plaguing the series. Fans who have invested years in Dragon Age’s world deserve better than a watered-down sequel that ignores its own past.

At this point, one has to wonder: Is this neglect by accident, or by design? BioWare failure with Veilguard will blame its fans—or finally, acknowledge the mistakes that led to the franchise’s decline?

Dragon Age's  Futures?

The release of "Dragon Age: The Veilguard" on October 31, 2024, marked the fourth major installment in BioWare's acclaimed fantasy role-playing series. Despite its critical acclaim and strong initial sales—topping Steam charts and breaking BioWare's concurrent player records—the game engaged approximately 1.5 million players in its first two months, falling nearly 50% short of Electronic Arts' (EA) expectations.

gamesradar.com

This underperformance had significant repercussions. In January 2025, EA announced a downward revision of its annual revenue forecast, attributing the shortfall to the disappointing sales of both "The Veilguard" and "EA Sports FC 25." Concurrently, BioWare underwent a major restructuring, resulting in layoffs and the reassignment of several team members to other EA studios. Notably, the studio confirmed that there are no plans for downloadable content (DLC) for "The Veilguard," as the focus shifts entirely to the development of "Mass Effect 5."

reddit.com

These developments have led to speculation about the future of the Dragon Age franchise. While the current outlook appears uncertain, neither EA nor BioWare have issued statements indicating the termination of the series. The decision to forgo DLC for "The Veilguard" and redirect resources toward the next Mass Effect title may suggest a strategic pause rather than an end. Given the franchise's storied history and dedicated fanbase, it remains plausible that BioWare will revisit the Dragon Age universe in the future.

In conclusion, while "Dragon Age: The Veilguard" did not meet commercial expectations, there is no definitive evidence to suggest that it marks the end of the Dragon Age series. The franchise's future will likely depend on BioWare's strategic priorities and the evolving dynamics of the gaming market.

---

Dragon Age: The True Canon to Sandal Should Have Been in Inquisition and The Veilguard

By [Poe Egerton]

The Dragon Age series has always thrived on its rich lore, compelling characters, and deep world-building. Yet, as Dragon Age: The Veilguard nears release, it's becoming evident that BioWare has left much of its past storytelling potential on the table. One of the most glaring missed opportunities is the absence of Sandal—the enigmatic dwarven savant with cryptic connections to the Fade and the mysterious workings of the world. His true canon story, hinted at throughout Dragon Age: Origins and Dragon Age II, should have been fully explored in Inquisition and certainly in The Veilguard.

Instead, BioWare seems to be distancing itself from its own narrative roots, making drastic changes that feel less like creative evolution and more like a deliberate attempt to sever ties with what made Dragon Age great. The result? A game launching with failure attached to it—seemingly engineered to alienate long-time fans and sink the franchise altogether.

---

Sandal: The Forgotten Key to Dragon Age’s Greatest Mystery

For those who have followed the Dragon Age series closely, Sandal was never just a quirky side character. His bizarre prophetic statements, unnatural magical abilities despite being a dwarf, and cryptic comments about the "coming darkness" painted him as a crucial figure in the unfolding events of Thedas. His fate was left unresolved after Dragon Age II, with Inquisition failing to provide even a hint of closure.

The idea that Veilguard—a game set to revolve around the chaos of the Veil and the looming war against Solas—has completely ignored Sandal’s role is a baffling decision. Given his unexplained knowledge of the Fade, his connection to enchantments that defy logic, and the hints that he may be something far more than he appears, he should have played a pivotal role in the upcoming game. Yet, BioWare seems intent on ignoring its own world-building.

---

The Problem with The Veilguard: A Deliberate Disconnect?

It’s one thing for a franchise to evolve; it’s another to abandon its foundations entirely. The Veilguard is not just a departure from Dragon Age’s past—it feels like a reboot disguised as a sequel. The drastic shift in tone, the erasure of key past characters, and the complete abandonment of the game’s darkest, most intriguing mysteries suggest a deliberate effort to steer the franchise into unfamiliar and, arguably, unwelcome territory.

This raises a serious question: Was Veilguard designed to fail? The early response from fans has been overwhelmingly negative, with criticisms aimed at the game’s art direction, character designs, and its apparent prioritization of accessibility over depth. It’s as if BioWare is setting the stage for Dragon Age to fizzle out, blaming the fans for “not showing up” when, in reality, the studio has systematically removed everything that once made the series compelling.

---

Missed Potential: A Series That Could Have Been So Much More

Dragon Age has a wealth of unfinished stories and unexplored lore that could have strengthened Veilguard’s narrative. The unresolved fates of characters like Sandal, the Architect, and even the Grey Wardens’ mysterious origins are just a few examples of threads left hanging. Instead of capitalizing on these established storylines, BioWare appears to be wiping the slate clean, ignoring the very lore that set Dragon Age apart from other fantasy RPGs.

The idea that Veilguard could have seamlessly woven these elements into its narrative makes the game’s current trajectory even more frustrating. If Sandal had been given his rightful place in the story, if Veilguard had truly embraced its own lore instead of discarding it, the game could have been a triumphant continuation rather than what now feels like a poorly executed soft reboot.

---

Conclusion: A Franchise Lost in Its Own Shadow

At its core, Dragon Age was always about intricate storytelling, deep lore, and meaningful choices. By failing to acknowledge its past, BioWare isn’t just making a questionable design choice—it’s actively dismantling the very essence of what made Dragon Age beloved.

The absence of Sandal in Inquisition and now Veilguard is more than just an oversight; it’s symbolic of the larger problem plaguing the series. Fans who have invested years in Dragon Age’s world deserve better than a watered-down sequel that ignores its own past.

At this point, one has to wonder: Is this neglect by accident, or by design? BioWare failure with Veilguard will blame its fans—or finally, acknowledge the mistakes that led to the franchise’s decline?

Dragon Age's  Futures?

The release of "Dragon Age: The Veilguard" on October 31, 2024, marked the fourth major installment in BioWare's acclaimed fantasy role-playing series. Despite its critical acclaim and strong initial sales—topping Steam charts and breaking BioWare's concurrent player records—the game engaged approximately 1.5 million players in its first two months, falling nearly 50% short of Electronic Arts' (EA) expectations.

gamesradar.com

This underperformance had significant repercussions. In January 2025, EA announced a downward revision of its annual revenue forecast, attributing the shortfall to the disappointing sales of both "The Veilguard" and "EA Sports FC 25." Concurrently, BioWare underwent a major restructuring, resulting in layoffs and the reassignment of several team members to other EA studios. Notably, the studio confirmed that there are no plans for downloadable content (DLC) for "The Veilguard," as the focus shifts entirely to the development of "Mass Effect 5."

reddit.com

These developments have led to speculation about the future of the Dragon Age franchise. While the current outlook appears uncertain, neither EA nor BioWare have issued statements indicating the termination of the series. The decision to forgo DLC for "The Veilguard" and redirect resources toward the next Mass Effect title may suggest a strategic pause rather than an end. Given the franchise's storied history and dedicated fanbase, it remains plausible that BioWare will revisit the Dragon Age universe in the future.

In conclusion, while "Dragon Age: The Veilguard" did not meet commercial expectations, there is no definitive evidence to suggest that it marks the end of the Dragon Age series. The franchise's future will likely depend on BioWare's strategic priorities and the evolving dynamics of the gaming market.

Undisputed’s Direction: Are Hardcore Boxing Fans Being Left Behind?

 

Boxing gaming fans have long awaited a true-to-life simulation that captures the essence of the sport. Undisputed, initially marketed as the next great hope for boxing video games, had garnered significant support from hardcore boxing fans, particularly in its early days as ESBC. However, a recent interview between Shawn Porter and Ash Habib, the owner of Steel City Interactive (SCI) and the creator of Undisputed, suggests that the game's direction may no longer prioritize the very fans who have championed it the most.

For those who have been closely following the game’s development, there has been a noticeable shift from its earlier promises of deep realism. In the interview, Ash Habib’s statements indicated that the hardcore fanbase—those who understand the nuances of the sport and crave a simulation experience—has become a secondary concern. This revelation is disheartening for those who believed Undisputed was meant to be the boxing simulation that would finally do justice to the sport, especially in an era where many sports games are accused of catering to casual audiences at the expense of realism.

A Shift from Hardcore Simulation?

During the ESBC phase, Undisputed seemed poised to be a deeply realistic boxing simulator. Fans were drawn to promises of advanced footwork, realistic punch mechanics, fighter tendencies, and in-depth strategy that would set it apart from previous arcade-style boxing games. However, as development has progressed, many of those elements have either been watered down or removed entirely in favor of accessibility.

This has left hardcore fans questioning whether SCI has lost sight of the game's original identity. If realism and sim elements are no longer a priority, then what makes Undisputed different from other past boxing titles that failed to live up to expectations? One could argue that this pivot is a business decision meant to attract a broader audience. But history shows that watering down realism for accessibility doesn’t necessarily lead to long-term success—just look at how hardcore fans continue to support deeply realistic sports sims like EA FC's Career Mode, NBA 2K’s MyNBA, or even classic titles like NFL 2K5 that emphasized authenticity.

Why Hardcore Fans Matter

The argument for appealing to casual players is understandable from a sales perspective. However, it's a short-sighted approach. Hardcore fans are the ones who will support a game long after the initial hype dies down. They will create leagues, tournaments, and content that keep the game alive. If SCI sidelines them in favor of a more "pick-up-and-play" experience, they risk losing the very audience that would sustain Undisputed for years to come.

Boxing, unlike other mainstream sports, doesn’t have a new game released every year. This means that whatever boxing game comes out has the potential to be the definitive title for the sport for a long time. That is precisely why getting the simulation aspects right is critical. If Undisputed fails to deliver the depth that hardcore boxing fans desire, another studio might step in and do it instead—potentially leaving SCI’s game as just another missed opportunity.

A Lost Opportunity?

The saddest part of this shift is that Undisputed had a real chance to become the ultimate boxing simulation. The foundation was there, but the execution seems to be drifting toward a middle ground that risks pleasing neither side—casuals may not find it engaging enough, while hardcore fans may feel alienated by the lack of depth.

The solution? Undisputed needs to re-emphasize realism and give players options to tailor the experience to their liking. Instead of watering down mechanics, they should allow players to customize realism settings. That way, both hardcore fans and casual players can enjoy the game in their own way.

Final Thoughts

It’s disappointing to see the hardcore fanbase become an afterthought in Undisputed’s development. These are the fans who have been pushing for a boxing sim for years and were the first to rally behind the game. SCI needs to recognize that realism isn’t a niche preference—it’s what gives the game long-term value and respect in the boxing and gaming communities.

If Undisputed continues down this path, it risks being yet another boxing title that falls short of expectations. But if SCI listens to the fans who truly care about the sport, there’s still time to course-correct and make Undisputed the definitive boxing simulation it was meant to be.

Undisputed’s Direction: Are Hardcore Boxing Fans Being Left Behind?

 

Boxing gaming fans have long awaited a true-to-life simulation that captures the essence of the sport. Undisputed, initially marketed as the next great hope for boxing video games, had garnered significant support from hardcore boxing fans, particularly in its early days as ESBC. However, a recent interview between Shawn Porter and Ash Habib, the owner of Steel City Interactive (SCI) and the creator of Undisputed, suggests that the game's direction may no longer prioritize the very fans who have championed it the most.

For those who have been closely following the game’s development, there has been a noticeable shift from its earlier promises of deep realism. In the interview, Ash Habib’s statements indicated that the hardcore fanbase—those who understand the nuances of the sport and crave a simulation experience—has become a secondary concern. This revelation is disheartening for those who believed Undisputed was meant to be the boxing simulation that would finally do justice to the sport, especially in an era where many sports games are accused of catering to casual audiences at the expense of realism.

A Shift from Hardcore Simulation?

During the ESBC phase, Undisputed seemed poised to be a deeply realistic boxing simulator. Fans were drawn to promises of advanced footwork, realistic punch mechanics, fighter tendencies, and in-depth strategy that would set it apart from previous arcade-style boxing games. However, as development has progressed, many of those elements have either been watered down or removed entirely in favor of accessibility.

This has left hardcore fans questioning whether SCI has lost sight of the game's original identity. If realism and sim elements are no longer a priority, then what makes Undisputed different from other past boxing titles that failed to live up to expectations? One could argue that this pivot is a business decision meant to attract a broader audience. But history shows that watering down realism for accessibility doesn’t necessarily lead to long-term success—just look at how hardcore fans continue to support deeply realistic sports sims like EA FC's Career Mode, NBA 2K’s MyNBA, or even classic titles like NFL 2K5 that emphasized authenticity.

Why Hardcore Fans Matter

The argument for appealing to casual players is understandable from a sales perspective. However, it's a short-sighted approach. Hardcore fans are the ones who will support a game long after the initial hype dies down. They will create leagues, tournaments, and content that keep the game alive. If SCI sidelines them in favor of a more "pick-up-and-play" experience, they risk losing the very audience that would sustain Undisputed for years to come.

Boxing, unlike other mainstream sports, doesn’t have a new game released every year. This means that whatever boxing game comes out has the potential to be the definitive title for the sport for a long time. That is precisely why getting the simulation aspects right is critical. If Undisputed fails to deliver the depth that hardcore boxing fans desire, another studio might step in and do it instead—potentially leaving SCI’s game as just another missed opportunity.

A Lost Opportunity?

The saddest part of this shift is that Undisputed had a real chance to become the ultimate boxing simulation. The foundation was there, but the execution seems to be drifting toward a middle ground that risks pleasing neither side—casuals may not find it engaging enough, while hardcore fans may feel alienated by the lack of depth.

The solution? Undisputed needs to re-emphasize realism and give players options to tailor the experience to their liking. Instead of watering down mechanics, they should allow players to customize realism settings. That way, both hardcore fans and casual players can enjoy the game in their own way.

Final Thoughts

It’s disappointing to see the hardcore fanbase become an afterthought in Undisputed’s development. These are the fans who have been pushing for a boxing sim for years and were the first to rally behind the game. SCI needs to recognize that realism isn’t a niche preference—it’s what gives the game long-term value and respect in the boxing and gaming communities.

If Undisputed continues down this path, it risks being yet another boxing title that falls short of expectations. But if SCI listens to the fans who truly care about the sport, there’s still time to course-correct and make Undisputed the definitive boxing simulation it was meant to be.

Realism Missing from Undisputed Boxing Game and What Needs to Be Added for Boxing Fans

 

Undisputed has made progress in boxing gaming, but it's still missing several key realistic elements that boxing fans expect. Below is a structured breakdown of what’s missing and what needs to be added for a truly authentic boxing experience.

---

1. Punch Variety & Realistic Punch Animations

What’s Missing:

• Lack of diverse punch animations in terms of angles, arcs, trajectory, delivery, and impact variations.
• Some punches feel stiff or generic rather than specific to different fighters' styles.
• Lack of inside fighting-specific punches such as short hooks, uppercuts, and body shots that land properly.
• Not all boxers have unique punching mechanics based on their real-life styles.

What Needs to Be Added:

• A large catalog of punch animations that vary based on each boxer’s style.
• Customizable punch styles, so players can modify how punches are thrown.
• More realistic punch trajectories, including looping shots, short compact punches, and unique variations of straight shots.
• Realistic punch reactions, meaning different levels of reaction based on power, timing, fatigue, and placement.

---

2. Defensive Styles & Blocking

What’s Missing:

• Limited defensive styles—most boxers use similar defensive mechanics.
• No deep list of block styles or hybrid defensive techniques.
• No realistic punishment for improper blocking (e.g., catching punches awkwardly, arms getting tired, or gloves being knocked out of position).
• Poor implementation of head movement—some boxers move unrealistically or lack fluidity.

What Needs to Be Added:

• Expanded list of block styles, including high guard, Philly shell, cross-arm defense, peekaboo, and modified hybrid blocks.
• Defensive fluidity, making slipping, rolling, and parrying feel natural rather than robotic.
• Stamina effects on defense, meaning if a boxer blocks too much, their guard weakens.
• Realistic defensive counters, where a well-timed block or slip leads to more counterpunch opportunities.

---

3. Footwork & Movement

What’s Missing:

• Loose foot movement is accessible to all fighters, which isn't realistic.
• Footwork lacks natural rhythm and sometimes feels stiff.
• No off-balance mechanics—fighters can punch from unrealistic stances without losing balance.
• No proper implementation of angles and lateral movement—fighters should be able to cut angles smoothly.

What Needs to Be Added:

• Footwork differentiation, where boxers with great movement (e.g., Lomachenko, Ali) feel distinct from flat-footed sluggers.
• Off-balance mechanics, where overcommitting to punches leads to potential loss of balance or falling into the ropes.
• More fluid lateral movement, allowing fighters to sidestep effectively.
• More realistic pivoting, making fighters turn their opponents rather than only circling.

---

4. Inside Fighting & Clinching

What’s Missing:

• Inside fighting is underdeveloped—fighters cannot properly work in close range.
• No real clinching mechanics—clinches feel unnatural and are not tactical.
• No realistic infighting techniques such as short uppercuts, body work, and roughhouse tactics.

What Needs to Be Added:

• True inside fighting, where fighters can work in the pocket with realistic body positioning.
• A clinch system that allows tactical use of clinching—holding should be an option but not spammed.
• Referee involvement in clinches, breaking them up in realistic ways.
• Realistic body shots and short-range punches, so inside fighters can effectively work up close.

---

5. Punch Impact & Knockdowns

What’s Missing:

• Punch reactions feel inconsistent—sometimes fighters don’t react to shots properly.
• Knockdowns don’t always look realistic—sometimes fighters fall in unnatural ways.
• No "stunned" animations that indicate when a fighter is hurt but not necessarily knocked down.

What Needs to Be Added:

• A range of punch reactions, from minor stumbles to full-blown knockdowns.
• Knockdowns that feel dynamic, where fighters fall differently based on punch placement and damage.
• Staggered states, where a fighter is hurt and needs to recover, adding more strategic moments.
• More dramatic knockout animations, similar to real-life KOs where fighters fall based on punch impact.

---

6. Boxer Tendencies & AI Behavior

What’s Missing:

• CPU fighters do not fight like their real-life counterparts.
• No proper implementation of boxer-specific tendencies.
• AI doesn't adjust mid-fight—fighters don't adapt their game plan.

What Needs to Be Added:

• True-to-life boxer tendencies, meaning aggressive fighters press the action while counterpunchers stay patient.
• AI that adjusts to the fight, recognizing openings and changing strategies.
• Stamina-based adjustments, where tired fighters become more defensive or cautious.

---

7. Career Mode & Customization

What’s Missing:

• Career mode lacks depth and is repetitive.
• No ability to create custom weight divisions or switch between different eras' weight classes.
• No deep Create-A-Boxer (CAB) mode—custom fighters lack detail.
• No ability to create custom trainers, referees, judges, and promoters to deepen career mode immersion.

What Needs to Be Added:

• A true dynamic career mode, allowing for multiple paths (early peak, slow rise, late-career resurgence).
• Custom weight class creation, including bridge weights, junior divisions, and open-weight fights.
• A deep Create-A-Boxer suite, similar to WWE 2K’s customization.
• Trainer selection that impacts gameplay, meaning some trainers specialize in power punching, defense, or conditioning.

---

8. Realistic Damage System

What’s Missing:

• Fighters do not accumulate realistic damage over time.
• No true long-term injuries—fighters recover too quickly between rounds.
• Cuts and swelling don’t always look natural.

What Needs to Be Added:

• Progressive damage, meaning fighters become visibly more worn down over rounds.
• Injuries that carry into future fights, forcing strategic decisions.
• Doctor stoppages, where referees or ringside doctors can halt a fight if a fighter is too damaged.
• More detailed cut and swelling physics, where different punches cause specific types of injuries.

---

9. Presentation & Atmosphere

What’s Missing:

• Lack of dynamic commentary—commentators don’t adapt to fight events.
• Poor belt presentation—winning a title feels underwhelming.
• No highlight shows or fight previews similar to NFL 2K5’s halftime show.

What Needs to Be Added:

• Better belt celebration sequences, making championship wins feel monumental.
• More dynamic commentary, adapting to the pace of the fight.
• Pre- and post-fight analysis, featuring highlights and fighter breakdowns.
• A full fight week experience, including press conferences and weigh-ins.

Here’s a prioritized list of what should be fixed first in Undisputed to make it the most realistic boxing simulation possible. The priority is based on gameplay impact, realism, and what boxing fans expect the most.

---

🔴 Top Priority (Game-Changing Fixes)

1. Punch Variety & Realistic Punch Animations

✅ Why? The core of boxing is punching, and right now, the punch variety is lacking. Fighters need unique punch animations that match their styles, and punches need better trajectory, delivery, and impact variations.
🔹 Add different punch arcs, angles, and styles
🔹 Make inside punches (short hooks, uppercuts, compact punches) more effective
🔹 Improve reaction to punches based on chin, balance, and impact

2. Footwork & Movement

✅ Why? Boxing is about movement, angles, and positioning. Right now, movement is too stiff, and all fighters have loose movement, which should be reserved for skilled movers.
🔹 Implement distinct footwork styles (e.g., Loma vs. GGG should feel different)
🔹 Add off-balance mechanics—punching from the wrong position should cause loss of balance
🔹 Improve pivoting and lateral movement

3. Defensive Styles & Blocking

✅ Why? Defense is as important as offense in boxing. Right now, blocking is too generic, and fighters don’t have unique defensive styles.
🔹 Add different block styles (high guard, Philly shell, cross-arm, peekaboo, hybrid styles)
🔹 Make head movement more fluid and natural
🔹 Implement realistic defensive counters—blocking/slipping should open counterpunch opportunities

4. Inside Fighting & Clinching

✅ Why? The inside game is missing, making infighting and roughhouse tactics ineffective.
🔹 Implement true inside fighting mechanics (short-range punches, body shots, infighting skills)
🔹 Make clinching tactical—fighters should be able to hold, push off, and work inside
🔹 Allow referee involvement in breaking clinches

---

🟠 Medium Priority (Essential for Depth & Realism)

5. AI Behavior & Boxer Tendencies

✅ Why? The CPU does not fight realistically—fighters don’t have true-to-life styles.
🔹 Improve boxer tendencies (e.g., Ali fights on the outside, while Tyson pressures inside)
🔹 Make AI adapt mid-fight, changing strategy based on damage, stamina, and opponent style
🔹 Add stamina-based adjustments (fatigued fighters should fight more cautiously)

6. Punch Impact & Knockdowns

✅ Why? Knockdowns feel too random and unrealistic at times. Some boxers react weirdly to punches.
🔹 Implement better punch reactions, including stagger animations before knockdowns
🔹 Add dynamic knockdowns based on punch impact and placement
🔹 Improve stunned animations, where fighters can be dazed without being knocked down

7. Realistic Damage System

✅ Why? Fighters don’t show enough progressive damage, and cuts/swelling feel basic.
🔹 Make cuts and swelling more realistic—certain punches should cause different injuries
🔹 Add doctor stoppages based on severe cuts/swelling
🔹 Implement injuries that carry into future fights (career mode)

---

🟡 Lower Priority (Nice to Have, But Not Urgent)

8. Career Mode & Customization Depth

✅ Why? Career mode lacks depth and customization options for fighters, trainers, and weight divisions.
🔹 Add trainer selection that impacts gameplay
🔹 Allow custom weight class creation (e.g., bridge weight, junior divisions)
🔹 Improve Create-A-Boxer mode with better customization

9. Belt Presentation & Atmosphere

✅ Why? Winning a championship should feel important, but the presentation is underwhelming.
🔹 Improve belt celebrations and animations
🔹 Add better commentary and fight previews
🔹 Include pre- and post-fight analysis, similar to NFL 2K5’s halftime show

---

🚀 Final Prioritization Summary

Priority	Feature	Why It’s Important
🔴 Top	Punch Variety & Animations	Boxing is built on punches—this must feel realistic.
🔴 Top	Footwork & Movement	Movement determines everything in boxing.
🔴 Top	Defensive Styles & Blocking	Different styles make boxers feel unique.
🔴 Top	Inside Fighting & Clinching	Infighting is a key missing mechanic.
🟠 Medium	AI Behavior & Boxer Tendencies	Real boxers should fight like themselves.
🟠 Medium	Punch Impact & Knockdowns	Knockdowns should look realistic.
🟠 Medium	Realistic Damage System	Cuts, swelling, and doctor stoppages should matter.
🟡 Lower	Career Mode & Customization	Adds long-term depth to the game.
🟡 Lower	Belt Presentation & Atmosphere	Enhances immersion but doesn't impact gameplay.

---

📌 Final Thoughts

To satisfy hardcore boxing fans, Undisputed must first fix punch mechanics, footwork, blocking, inside fighting, and AI tendencies. Once the foundation is strong, they can improve career mode, presentation, and customization.

Realism Missing from Undisputed Boxing Game and What Needs to Be Added for Boxing Fans

 

Undisputed has made progress in boxing gaming, but it's still missing several key realistic elements that boxing fans expect. Below is a structured breakdown of what’s missing and what needs to be added for a truly authentic boxing experience.

---

1. Punch Variety & Realistic Punch Animations

What’s Missing:

• Lack of diverse punch animations in terms of angles, arcs, trajectory, delivery, and impact variations.
• Some punches feel stiff or generic rather than specific to different fighters' styles.
• Lack of inside fighting-specific punches such as short hooks, uppercuts, and body shots that land properly.
• Not all boxers have unique punching mechanics based on their real-life styles.

What Needs to Be Added:

• A large catalog of punch animations that vary based on each boxer’s style.
• Customizable punch styles, so players can modify how punches are thrown.
• More realistic punch trajectories, including looping shots, short compact punches, and unique variations of straight shots.
• Realistic punch reactions, meaning different levels of reaction based on power, timing, fatigue, and placement.

---

2. Defensive Styles & Blocking

What’s Missing:

• Limited defensive styles—most boxers use similar defensive mechanics.
• No deep list of block styles or hybrid defensive techniques.
• No realistic punishment for improper blocking (e.g., catching punches awkwardly, arms getting tired, or gloves being knocked out of position).
• Poor implementation of head movement—some boxers move unrealistically or lack fluidity.

What Needs to Be Added:

• Expanded list of block styles, including high guard, Philly shell, cross-arm defense, peekaboo, and modified hybrid blocks.
• Defensive fluidity, making slipping, rolling, and parrying feel natural rather than robotic.
• Stamina effects on defense, meaning if a boxer blocks too much, their guard weakens.
• Realistic defensive counters, where a well-timed block or slip leads to more counterpunch opportunities.

---

3. Footwork & Movement

What’s Missing:

• Loose foot movement is accessible to all fighters, which isn't realistic.
• Footwork lacks natural rhythm and sometimes feels stiff.
• No off-balance mechanics—fighters can punch from unrealistic stances without losing balance.
• No proper implementation of angles and lateral movement—fighters should be able to cut angles smoothly.

What Needs to Be Added:

• Footwork differentiation, where boxers with great movement (e.g., Lomachenko, Ali) feel distinct from flat-footed sluggers.
• Off-balance mechanics, where overcommitting to punches leads to potential loss of balance or falling into the ropes.
• More fluid lateral movement, allowing fighters to sidestep effectively.
• More realistic pivoting, making fighters turn their opponents rather than only circling.

---

4. Inside Fighting & Clinching

What’s Missing:

• Inside fighting is underdeveloped—fighters cannot properly work in close range.
• No real clinching mechanics—clinches feel unnatural and are not tactical.
• No realistic infighting techniques such as short uppercuts, body work, and roughhouse tactics.

What Needs to Be Added:

• True inside fighting, where fighters can work in the pocket with realistic body positioning.
• A clinch system that allows tactical use of clinching—holding should be an option but not spammed.
• Referee involvement in clinches, breaking them up in realistic ways.
• Realistic body shots and short-range punches, so inside fighters can effectively work up close.

---

5. Punch Impact & Knockdowns

What’s Missing:

• Punch reactions feel inconsistent—sometimes fighters don’t react to shots properly.
• Knockdowns don’t always look realistic—sometimes fighters fall in unnatural ways.
• No "stunned" animations that indicate when a fighter is hurt but not necessarily knocked down.

What Needs to Be Added:

• A range of punch reactions, from minor stumbles to full-blown knockdowns.
• Knockdowns that feel dynamic, where fighters fall differently based on punch placement and damage.
• Staggered states, where a fighter is hurt and needs to recover, adding more strategic moments.
• More dramatic knockout animations, similar to real-life KOs where fighters fall based on punch impact.

---

6. Boxer Tendencies & AI Behavior

What’s Missing:

• CPU fighters do not fight like their real-life counterparts.
• No proper implementation of boxer-specific tendencies.
• AI doesn't adjust mid-fight—fighters don't adapt their game plan.

What Needs to Be Added:

• True-to-life boxer tendencies, meaning aggressive fighters press the action while counterpunchers stay patient.
• AI that adjusts to the fight, recognizing openings and changing strategies.
• Stamina-based adjustments, where tired fighters become more defensive or cautious.

---

7. Career Mode & Customization

What’s Missing:

• Career mode lacks depth and is repetitive.
• No ability to create custom weight divisions or switch between different eras' weight classes.
• No deep Create-A-Boxer (CAB) mode—custom fighters lack detail.
• No ability to create custom trainers, referees, judges, and promoters to deepen career mode immersion.

What Needs to Be Added:

• A true dynamic career mode, allowing for multiple paths (early peak, slow rise, late-career resurgence).
• Custom weight class creation, including bridge weights, junior divisions, and open-weight fights.
• A deep Create-A-Boxer suite, similar to WWE 2K’s customization.
• Trainer selection that impacts gameplay, meaning some trainers specialize in power punching, defense, or conditioning.

---

8. Realistic Damage System

What’s Missing:

• Fighters do not accumulate realistic damage over time.
• No true long-term injuries—fighters recover too quickly between rounds.
• Cuts and swelling don’t always look natural.

What Needs to Be Added:

• Progressive damage, meaning fighters become visibly more worn down over rounds.
• Injuries that carry into future fights, forcing strategic decisions.
• Doctor stoppages, where referees or ringside doctors can halt a fight if a fighter is too damaged.
• More detailed cut and swelling physics, where different punches cause specific types of injuries.

---

9. Presentation & Atmosphere

What’s Missing:

• Lack of dynamic commentary—commentators don’t adapt to fight events.
• Poor belt presentation—winning a title feels underwhelming.
• No highlight shows or fight previews similar to NFL 2K5’s halftime show.

What Needs to Be Added:

• Better belt celebration sequences, making championship wins feel monumental.
• More dynamic commentary, adapting to the pace of the fight.
• Pre- and post-fight analysis, featuring highlights and fighter breakdowns.
• A full fight week experience, including press conferences and weigh-ins.

Here’s a prioritized list of what should be fixed first in Undisputed to make it the most realistic boxing simulation possible. The priority is based on gameplay impact, realism, and what boxing fans expect the most.

---

🔴 Top Priority (Game-Changing Fixes)

1. Punch Variety & Realistic Punch Animations

✅ Why? The core of boxing is punching, and right now, the punch variety is lacking. Fighters need unique punch animations that match their styles, and punches need better trajectory, delivery, and impact variations.
🔹 Add different punch arcs, angles, and styles
🔹 Make inside punches (short hooks, uppercuts, compact punches) more effective
🔹 Improve reaction to punches based on chin, balance, and impact

2. Footwork & Movement

✅ Why? Boxing is about movement, angles, and positioning. Right now, movement is too stiff, and all fighters have loose movement, which should be reserved for skilled movers.
🔹 Implement distinct footwork styles (e.g., Loma vs. GGG should feel different)
🔹 Add off-balance mechanics—punching from the wrong position should cause loss of balance
🔹 Improve pivoting and lateral movement

3. Defensive Styles & Blocking

✅ Why? Defense is as important as offense in boxing. Right now, blocking is too generic, and fighters don’t have unique defensive styles.
🔹 Add different block styles (high guard, Philly shell, cross-arm, peekaboo, hybrid styles)
🔹 Make head movement more fluid and natural
🔹 Implement realistic defensive counters—blocking/slipping should open counterpunch opportunities

4. Inside Fighting & Clinching

✅ Why? The inside game is missing, making infighting and roughhouse tactics ineffective.
🔹 Implement true inside fighting mechanics (short-range punches, body shots, infighting skills)
🔹 Make clinching tactical—fighters should be able to hold, push off, and work inside
🔹 Allow referee involvement in breaking clinches

---

🟠 Medium Priority (Essential for Depth & Realism)

5. AI Behavior & Boxer Tendencies

✅ Why? The CPU does not fight realistically—fighters don’t have true-to-life styles.
🔹 Improve boxer tendencies (e.g., Ali fights on the outside, while Tyson pressures inside)
🔹 Make AI adapt mid-fight, changing strategy based on damage, stamina, and opponent style
🔹 Add stamina-based adjustments (fatigued fighters should fight more cautiously)

6. Punch Impact & Knockdowns

✅ Why? Knockdowns feel too random and unrealistic at times. Some boxers react weirdly to punches.
🔹 Implement better punch reactions, including stagger animations before knockdowns
🔹 Add dynamic knockdowns based on punch impact and placement
🔹 Improve stunned animations, where fighters can be dazed without being knocked down

7. Realistic Damage System

✅ Why? Fighters don’t show enough progressive damage, and cuts/swelling feel basic.
🔹 Make cuts and swelling more realistic—certain punches should cause different injuries
🔹 Add doctor stoppages based on severe cuts/swelling
🔹 Implement injuries that carry into future fights (career mode)

---

🟡 Lower Priority (Nice to Have, But Not Urgent)

8. Career Mode & Customization Depth

✅ Why? Career mode lacks depth and customization options for fighters, trainers, and weight divisions.
🔹 Add trainer selection that impacts gameplay
🔹 Allow custom weight class creation (e.g., bridge weight, junior divisions)
🔹 Improve Create-A-Boxer mode with better customization

9. Belt Presentation & Atmosphere

✅ Why? Winning a championship should feel important, but the presentation is underwhelming.
🔹 Improve belt celebrations and animations
🔹 Add better commentary and fight previews
🔹 Include pre- and post-fight analysis, similar to NFL 2K5’s halftime show

---

🚀 Final Prioritization Summary

Priority	Feature	Why It’s Important
🔴 Top	Punch Variety & Animations	Boxing is built on punches—this must feel realistic.
🔴 Top	Footwork & Movement	Movement determines everything in boxing.
🔴 Top	Defensive Styles & Blocking	Different styles make boxers feel unique.
🔴 Top	Inside Fighting & Clinching	Infighting is a key missing mechanic.
🟠 Medium	AI Behavior & Boxer Tendencies	Real boxers should fight like themselves.
🟠 Medium	Punch Impact & Knockdowns	Knockdowns should look realistic.
🟠 Medium	Realistic Damage System	Cuts, swelling, and doctor stoppages should matter.
🟡 Lower	Career Mode & Customization	Adds long-term depth to the game.
🟡 Lower	Belt Presentation & Atmosphere	Enhances immersion but doesn't impact gameplay.

---

📌 Final Thoughts

To satisfy hardcore boxing fans, Undisputed must first fix punch mechanics, footwork, blocking, inside fighting, and AI tendencies. Once the foundation is strong, they can improve career mode, presentation, and customization.

The History of Boxing Video Games

 

Boxing has been a part of video gaming since the earliest days of the industry. The sport’s simple premise—two fighters engaging in a one-on-one battle—made it an ideal candidate for adaptation into interactive entertainment. Over the years, boxing games have evolved from pixelated representations to highly realistic simulations, reflecting the growth of gaming technology. This article explores the history of boxing video games, from their humble beginnings to the modern-day quest for realism.

The Beginnings: Arcade and Early Home Consoles (1970s–1980s)

The first boxing video game can be traced back to 1978’s Heavyweight Champ, developed by SEGA. It featured a side-scrolling view of two boxers, using a simple control scheme to allow players to punch their opponent. While rudimentary, it laid the foundation for boxing games to come.

In 1980, Boxing for the Atari 2600 introduced a top-down perspective, giving players more control over their boxer’s movement. The game, developed by Activision, was simple yet competitive, setting the stage for future boxing titles on home consoles.

As arcade gaming boomed in the early 1980s, Punch-Out!! (1984) from Nintendo became one of the most iconic boxing games of its era. The game featured a unique design with wireframe characters and large, expressive opponents. Nintendo later brought it to the NES as Mike Tyson’s Punch-Out!! in 1987, introducing gamers to one of the most memorable final bosses in gaming history: Mike Tyson himself.

The Rise of Simulation and Strategy (1990s)

As gaming hardware improved, so did boxing games. The 16-bit era introduced more refined graphics and deeper mechanics. Games like Evander Holyfield’s Real Deal Boxing (1992) on the Sega Genesis and Taito’s Final Blow provided a mix of arcade action and rudimentary simulation elements.

By the mid-to-late ‘90s, the PlayStation and Nintendo 64 ushered in the 3D era. Knockout Kings (1998) by EA Sports marked a shift toward realism, featuring real-life boxers, career mode progression, and a greater emphasis on simulating the technical aspects of the sport. It was the first mainstream attempt to make boxing more than just a button-mashing brawler.

The Golden Age of Boxing Games (2000s)

The early 2000s were a golden era for boxing video games, with titles that balanced realism, accessibility, and presentation.

EA Sports’ Fight Night series, starting with Fight Night 2004, changed the landscape of boxing video games. It introduced the Total Punch Control system, allowing players to throw punches using the right analog stick rather than button presses. This innovation made the gameplay feel more intuitive and skill-based.

The pinnacle of the series, Fight Night Round 3 (2006), pushed visual realism to new heights with detailed character models and fluid animations. The game received critical acclaim for its cinematic presentation and deep career mode. Fight Night Champion (2011) followed, introducing a more mature, story-driven approach to boxing.

The Decline and Absence of Boxing Games (2012–2020s)

After Fight Night Champion, the boxing game genre experienced a decline. EA Sports shifted its focus to UFC games, and no major studio stepped up to fill the void with a true simulation boxing experience. While indie developers attempted to keep boxing games alive, the absence of a major simulation title left boxing fans without a go-to option for years.

During this period, some arcade-style boxing games, such as Creed: Rise to Glory (2018), appeared in the VR space, but they lacked the depth that boxing simulation fans craved.

The Return of Boxing Games (2020s and Beyond)

The long-awaited resurgence of boxing games came with Undisputed (formerly ESBC), which promised an authentic boxing experience. Unlike past boxing games, Undisputed aimed for true simulation, featuring real fighters, realistic physics, and deep career modes. Although its development process has been lengthy, the demand for a proper boxing sim remains high.

Meanwhile, other developers have begun experimenting with boxing mechanics, and there is renewed hope that the sport will return to the forefront of gaming.

Conclusion: The Future of Boxing Games

The history of boxing video games has seen the genre shift from simple arcade brawlers to sophisticated simulations. While the past decade saw a decline in major boxing titles, new developments suggest a bright future for the sport in gaming. With advancements in technology and a growing demand for realism, boxing games could make a major comeback, once again putting players in the ring for the ultimate test of skill and strategy.

As gaming technology continues to advance, the dream of the perfect boxing simulation remains closer than ever. Whether through indie developers or major studios, the legacy of boxing video games is far from over

The History of Boxing Video Games

 

Boxing has been a part of video gaming since the earliest days of the industry. The sport’s simple premise—two fighters engaging in a one-on-one battle—made it an ideal candidate for adaptation into interactive entertainment. Over the years, boxing games have evolved from pixelated representations to highly realistic simulations, reflecting the growth of gaming technology. This article explores the history of boxing video games, from their humble beginnings to the modern-day quest for realism.

The Beginnings: Arcade and Early Home Consoles (1970s–1980s)

The first boxing video game can be traced back to 1978’s Heavyweight Champ, developed by SEGA. It featured a side-scrolling view of two boxers, using a simple control scheme to allow players to punch their opponent. While rudimentary, it laid the foundation for boxing games to come.

In 1980, Boxing for the Atari 2600 introduced a top-down perspective, giving players more control over their boxer’s movement. The game, developed by Activision, was simple yet competitive, setting the stage for future boxing titles on home consoles.

As arcade gaming boomed in the early 1980s, Punch-Out!! (1984) from Nintendo became one of the most iconic boxing games of its era. The game featured a unique design with wireframe characters and large, expressive opponents. Nintendo later brought it to the NES as Mike Tyson’s Punch-Out!! in 1987, introducing gamers to one of the most memorable final bosses in gaming history: Mike Tyson himself.

The Rise of Simulation and Strategy (1990s)

As gaming hardware improved, so did boxing games. The 16-bit era introduced more refined graphics and deeper mechanics. Games like Evander Holyfield’s Real Deal Boxing (1992) on the Sega Genesis and Taito’s Final Blow provided a mix of arcade action and rudimentary simulation elements.

By the mid-to-late ‘90s, the PlayStation and Nintendo 64 ushered in the 3D era. Knockout Kings (1998) by EA Sports marked a shift toward realism, featuring real-life boxers, career mode progression, and a greater emphasis on simulating the technical aspects of the sport. It was the first mainstream attempt to make boxing more than just a button-mashing brawler.

The Golden Age of Boxing Games (2000s)

The early 2000s were a golden era for boxing video games, with titles that balanced realism, accessibility, and presentation.

EA Sports’ Fight Night series, starting with Fight Night 2004, changed the landscape of boxing video games. It introduced the Total Punch Control system, allowing players to throw punches using the right analog stick rather than button presses. This innovation made the gameplay feel more intuitive and skill-based.

The pinnacle of the series, Fight Night Round 3 (2006), pushed visual realism to new heights with detailed character models and fluid animations. The game received critical acclaim for its cinematic presentation and deep career mode. Fight Night Champion (2011) followed, introducing a more mature, story-driven approach to boxing.

The Decline and Absence of Boxing Games (2012–2020s)

After Fight Night Champion, the boxing game genre experienced a decline. EA Sports shifted its focus to UFC games, and no major studio stepped up to fill the void with a true simulation boxing experience. While indie developers attempted to keep boxing games alive, the absence of a major simulation title left boxing fans without a go-to option for years.

During this period, some arcade-style boxing games, such as Creed: Rise to Glory (2018), appeared in the VR space, but they lacked the depth that boxing simulation fans craved.

The Return of Boxing Games (2020s and Beyond)

The long-awaited resurgence of boxing games came with Undisputed (formerly ESBC), which promised an authentic boxing experience. Unlike past boxing games, Undisputed aimed for true simulation, featuring real fighters, realistic physics, and deep career modes. Although its development process has been lengthy, the demand for a proper boxing sim remains high.

Meanwhile, other developers have begun experimenting with boxing mechanics, and there is renewed hope that the sport will return to the forefront of gaming.

Conclusion: The Future of Boxing Games

The history of boxing video games has seen the genre shift from simple arcade brawlers to sophisticated simulations. While the past decade saw a decline in major boxing titles, new developments suggest a bright future for the sport in gaming. With advancements in technology and a growing demand for realism, boxing games could make a major comeback, once again putting players in the ring for the ultimate test of skill and strategy.

As gaming technology continues to advance, the dream of the perfect boxing simulation remains closer than ever. Whether through indie developers or major studios, the legacy of boxing video games is far from over

What Changed Visually and Graphically in Undisputed Since the Alpha David Adeleye and Eddie Hall Gameplay?

When Undisputed (formerly eSports Boxing Club or ESBC) was first showcased in its Alpha stage, featuring David Adeleye and Eddie Hall, the game had a much more grounded and visually appealing style that resonated with boxing purists. However, over time, the graphical fidelity and overall aesthetic of the game appear to have shifted significantly. Many fans of the original footage have expressed disappointment, arguing that the game has taken on a more arcadey look and feel. So, what exactly changed?

1. Visual Fidelity and Character Models

In the earlier Alpha footage, character models looked more detailed, with realistic skin textures, lighting effects, and sweat physics. Adeleye and Hall appeared weighty, with subtle animations that made them feel grounded in the ring. As development progressed, however, the character models became less detailed, with smoother textures that lack the same level of realism. Some boxers now have a more plasticky look, and the sense of individual boxer uniqueness has diminished.

2. Lighting and Shadows

Lighting played a crucial role in the early Alpha versions, creating an authentic atmosphere with dramatic shadows and realistic reflections. The ring looked vibrant yet natural, and the lighting effectively enhanced the depth of each fighter’s physique. In the later builds, the lighting appears flatter, with more even brightness that washes out some of the finer details. Shadows are less pronounced, making the game look less cinematic and more generic.

3. Punch Reactions and Impact Animations

One of the biggest concerns among fans is how punch reactions have evolved. Initially, knockdowns and impact animations were more fluid and responsive to the point of impact, showcasing realistic weight shifts, balance losses, and staggered movements. In later versions, knockdown physics appear more canned, with animations that sometimes seem pre-determined rather than dynamically responding to the punch. The sense of unpredictability in how a fighter reacts to getting hit has lessened.

4. Footwork and Movement

In the early Alpha, boxers moved with a sense of natural momentum, with more distinct differences in footwork between fighters. The weight shifts, pivots, and directional movements contributed to a realistic feel. Now, movement appears more uniform across boxers, with many fighters gliding rather than stepping with realistic foot pressure. This has contributed to a floaty, almost arcade-like experience, removing the grounded realism that boxing fans initially praised.

5. The Hit Detection and Strike Feedback

Early footage suggested a strong physics-based approach to punch impact, with visible deformation of skin and muscle upon contact. Later builds seem to have reduced this effect, leading to a less satisfying visual response when punches land. Some players have noted that punches appear to phase through opponents slightly, making the overall experience feel less immersive.

6. The Downgrade in Presentation and Atmosphere

Beyond the fighters themselves, the ring and crowd environments have seen changes. The early Alpha versions showcased a more dynamic crowd with realistic movement and lighting interactions. Now, crowds appear stiffer and less responsive, while the overall atmosphere feels less immersive. The ring itself, once filled with lifelike reflections and texture detail, has lost some of its sharpness, making it feel more like a generic arena.

7. Why Did These Changes Happen?

The visual and graphical downgrades may be the result of several factors:

• Optimization for performance: The game may have been adjusted to ensure stable frame rates across multiple platforms, leading to reductions in graphical detail.

• Changes in development staff: Some fans speculate that key developers or artists who worked on the earlier builds may have left, resulting in a shift in artistic direction.

• Shift in priorities: Undisputed may have moved toward a more casual-friendly, accessible experience, which sometimes results in visual and gameplay simplifications.

Conclusion: A Shift Away from the Alpha Vision?

While Undisputed still has potential as a boxing simulation, many fans feel that its visual and gameplay identity has drifted from the promising Alpha footage featuring Adeleye and Hall. The original version had a raw, authentic feel that made it stand out, while the current iteration seems to have sacrificed realism in favor of a smoother but less impactful experience.

Whether these changes are permanent or will be addressed in future updates remains to be seen. However, one thing is clear: the community values realism, and if Undisputed wants to truly capture the spirit of boxing, it may need to reconsider its graphical and gameplay direction.

What Changed Visually and Graphically in Undisputed Since the Alpha David Adeleye and Eddie Hall Gameplay?

When Undisputed (formerly eSports Boxing Club or ESBC) was first showcased in its Alpha stage, featuring David Adeleye and Eddie Hall, the game had a much more grounded and visually appealing style that resonated with boxing purists. However, over time, the graphical fidelity and overall aesthetic of the game appear to have shifted significantly. Many fans of the original footage have expressed disappointment, arguing that the game has taken on a more arcadey look and feel. So, what exactly changed?

1. Visual Fidelity and Character Models

In the earlier Alpha footage, character models looked more detailed, with realistic skin textures, lighting effects, and sweat physics. Adeleye and Hall appeared weighty, with subtle animations that made them feel grounded in the ring. As development progressed, however, the character models became less detailed, with smoother textures that lack the same level of realism. Some boxers now have a more plasticky look, and the sense of individual boxer uniqueness has diminished.

2. Lighting and Shadows

Lighting played a crucial role in the early Alpha versions, creating an authentic atmosphere with dramatic shadows and realistic reflections. The ring looked vibrant yet natural, and the lighting effectively enhanced the depth of each fighter’s physique. In the later builds, the lighting appears flatter, with more even brightness that washes out some of the finer details. Shadows are less pronounced, making the game look less cinematic and more generic.

3. Punch Reactions and Impact Animations

One of the biggest concerns among fans is how punch reactions have evolved. Initially, knockdowns and impact animations were more fluid and responsive to the point of impact, showcasing realistic weight shifts, balance losses, and staggered movements. In later versions, knockdown physics appear more canned, with animations that sometimes seem pre-determined rather than dynamically responding to the punch. The sense of unpredictability in how a fighter reacts to getting hit has lessened.

4. Footwork and Movement

In the early Alpha, boxers moved with a sense of natural momentum, with more distinct differences in footwork between fighters. The weight shifts, pivots, and directional movements contributed to a realistic feel. Now, movement appears more uniform across boxers, with many fighters gliding rather than stepping with realistic foot pressure. This has contributed to a floaty, almost arcade-like experience, removing the grounded realism that boxing fans initially praised.

5. The Hit Detection and Strike Feedback

Early footage suggested a strong physics-based approach to punch impact, with visible deformation of skin and muscle upon contact. Later builds seem to have reduced this effect, leading to a less satisfying visual response when punches land. Some players have noted that punches appear to phase through opponents slightly, making the overall experience feel less immersive.

6. The Downgrade in Presentation and Atmosphere

Beyond the fighters themselves, the ring and crowd environments have seen changes. The early Alpha versions showcased a more dynamic crowd with realistic movement and lighting interactions. Now, crowds appear stiffer and less responsive, while the overall atmosphere feels less immersive. The ring itself, once filled with lifelike reflections and texture detail, has lost some of its sharpness, making it feel more like a generic arena.

7. Why Did These Changes Happen?

The visual and graphical downgrades may be the result of several factors:

• Optimization for performance: The game may have been adjusted to ensure stable frame rates across multiple platforms, leading to reductions in graphical detail.

• Changes in development staff: Some fans speculate that key developers or artists who worked on the earlier builds may have left, resulting in a shift in artistic direction.

• Shift in priorities: Undisputed may have moved toward a more casual-friendly, accessible experience, which sometimes results in visual and gameplay simplifications.

Conclusion: A Shift Away from the Alpha Vision?

While Undisputed still has potential as a boxing simulation, many fans feel that its visual and gameplay identity has drifted from the promising Alpha footage featuring Adeleye and Hall. The original version had a raw, authentic feel that made it stand out, while the current iteration seems to have sacrificed realism in favor of a smoother but less impactful experience.

Whether these changes are permanent or will be addressed in future updates remains to be seen. However, one thing is clear: the community values realism, and if Undisputed wants to truly capture the spirit of boxing, it may need to reconsider its graphical and gameplay direction.

Stop the Glazing: Why Undisputed Boxing Game Won’t Improve Without Honest Criticism

 

The Problem with Glazing: Why Undisputed Won’t Improve Without Honest Criticism

The Undisputed boxing game, formerly known as ESBC, promised to be the most realistic boxing simulation ever made. Early gameplay previews generated excitement among boxing and sports gaming fans alike, hoping for a game that would finally deliver an authentic in-ring experience. However, since its early access release, it has been plagued with gameplay inconsistencies, unrealistic mechanics, and questionable development decisions.

Despite these issues, some content creators have chosen to defend the game blindly—going as far as attacking anyone who dares to criticize it. This kind of "glazing" does more harm than good. The truth is, Undisputed will never improve if fans aren't honest about its condition.

Content Creators Protecting the Game at All Costs

Many content creators have built their platforms around Undisputed, whether by providing gameplay videos, analysis, or promotional content. Some of them are genuinely passionate about boxing games, but others seem more focused on maintaining their relationship with the developers rather than advocating for a better product.

Instead of addressing the game’s shortcomings—such as poor punch reactions, robotic movement, lack of boxing fundamentals, and inconsistent defensive mechanics—some creators are downplaying these issues or even pretending they don’t exist. Worse, they attack those who raise valid concerns, labeling them as “haters” rather than acknowledging that criticism is necessary for progress.

This creates an echo chamber where only positive feedback is encouraged, leaving the game’s problems unresolved. Developers get the false impression that the game is “good enough,” leading to slow or misguided improvements.

The Consequences of Blind Praise

Glorifying Undisputed without holding it accountable has serious consequences for the boxing gaming community:

1. Slower Progress and Poor Updates – If the developers only hear praise, they have no incentive to fix glaring issues. This means gameplay mechanics will remain flawed, and the game will continue to feel unfinished.

2. Misleading the Community – Casual players looking for an authentic boxing experience might be tricked into thinking Undisputed is the polished product it claims to be. When they realize it falls short, they’ll feel misled and lose interest.

3. Dividing the Community – The hostility towards constructive criticism creates unnecessary tension between fans who want a better game and those who defend it blindly. Instead of working together to push for improvements, the community ends up fighting itself.

Honest Criticism Is the Only Way Forward

Boxing fans deserve a game that respects the sport’s nuances, strategies, and realism. That won’t happen if everyone pretends Undisputed is already a perfect simulation.

The best thing content creators and fans can do is demand better. Criticism doesn’t mean hating—it means caring enough to push for change. It means calling out unrealistic mechanics, pushing for more fluid animations, demanding deeper boxer AI, and making sure the game evolves into what it was originally promised to be.

Developers need to be held accountable. They need to hear what’s wrong so they can fix it. Without that, Undisputed will never reach its full potential, and boxing fans will once again be left without a true sim experience.

It’s time to stop glazing and start demanding the boxing game we’ve all been waiting for.

📢 The Truth Hurts, But It’s Necessary

The Undisputed boxing game, formerly ESBC, promised to be a revolutionary boxing simulation. Early access excitement quickly turned into frustration as players noticed glaring gameplay flaws. But instead of addressing these issues, some content creators are glazing—hyping up the game while attacking anyone who criticizes it.

🚨 If fans aren’t honest, the game will never improve.

---

🔍 Content Creators Are Shielding the Game

Some content creators, likely benefiting from their association with the developers, are dismissing legitimate concerns and aggressively defending the game despite its problems.

🎯 How are they glazing?

✅ Ignoring obvious gameplay flaws
✅ Downplaying criticism as "hating"
✅ Attacking those who demand improvements
✅ Pretending the game is near perfection

Reality Check: Undisputed still struggles with punch reactions, robotic movement, poor AI, and a lack of boxing fundamentals. Ignoring these issues doesn’t make them go away—it delays progress!

---

⚠️ The Consequences of Blind Praise

🎭 Misleading the Community – New players are tricked into believing Undisputed is a polished product when it still lacks key improvements.

🐌 Slower Updates & Progress – Developers won’t feel pressure to fix mechanics if all they hear is praise. Less criticism = less motivation to improve.

💥 Dividing the Community – Instead of working together to demand a better game, the community fights over whether the game is actually good.

---

🛠 Honest Criticism = A Better Game

Boxing fans don’t just want any game—they want a realistic simulation that respects the sport. To achieve that, we must:

✔️ Hold developers accountable for gameplay flaws
✔️ Push for better movement, AI, and realism
✔️ Encourage objective feedback instead of blind praise
✔️ Support creators who tell the truth about the game’s state

🔮 Undisputed CAN be great, but only if fans stop glazing and start demanding the game they deserve!